AOC's 2028 decision: Run for president or Senate

What should AOC run for?

  • President

    Votes: 9 10.8%
  • Senate

    Votes: 74 89.2%

  • Total voters
    83

Westbama Heartthrob

Irregular Zero
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
12,834
Reputation
6,845
Daps
55,169
Reppin
Black Belt
If she runs for president then truly the democrats are an unserious organization
and don’t give two shyts about the people.

I’m not saying she wouldn’t do a good job, I’m saying she can’t win.
Better than Clinton, Biden, harris, or Newsome :manny:

Dems better run a progressive or just get used to more republican presidenties. Cause it's getting harder to sell the lessor of two evils thing when the majority of people are struggling. Struggling less or "anyone but trump" ain't fixing the problems that have been here decades. But my faith in the democrats ain't high they'll make the right decision. All I cam do is my part in showing out for the primaries, but I got a bad feeling another L is on the way :francis:
 

Unbothered

Our Black Shining Prince 🤴🏾✨
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,126
Reputation
1,645
Daps
10,919
Reppin
'Cuse, New York
Better than Clinton, Biden, harris, or Newsome :manny:

Dems better run a progressive or just get used to more republican presidenties. Cause it's getting harder to sell the lessor of two evils thing when the majority of people are struggling. Struggling less or "anyone but trump" ain't fixing the problems that have been here decades. But my faith in the democrats ain't high they'll make the right decision. All I cam do is my part in showing out for the primaries, but I got a bad feeling another L is on the way :francis:
I've mentioned a few times that the best thing for Dems this upcoming election is that fact that they can actually move on from this Trump saga and start fresh. As you pointed out, the anyone but Trump perspective failed 2/3 times, with him out of the picture in terms of running for president it should rejuvenate them when it comes to messaging and agenda.

So, to further elaborate on the bolded, yes, Trump winning was a sad affair; however, it's not all gloomy either. The bright side is that we know for a fact he'll be a nonfactor in terms of running for the presidency or being on the ballot anymore, his influence will be hanging around but it'll be a fresh of breath air knowing he's no longer opposite of the ballot, so the Dems will be facing a new character which could be a good thing or a bad thing for Democrats in '28.

This means that the Dems are going to have to run a much better campaign, not necessarily in regards to policies and such but rather attitude and mentality, one of the things that have led the Blue side into becoming stagnant in their approach is the fact many Democrats as well as their voters overestimated, underestimated, miscalculated, and overly reliant on running on the idea of “not being Trump” failing to understand that's a losing strategy and is not good enough to win.

The Dems are going to need a candidate that can “restore the feeling” that was present in '08 and, to some extent, in '12. Now, the nominee doesn't have to be Obama 2.0, but they need to have that ability to galvanize the people similarly. The truth is that Biden, Kamala, and Hillary all had too much baggage (some out of their control; gender, age, political scandal, etc) and “perception of character” issues that proved to be too much to overcome in the minds of voters.

The problem is that the Dems will no longer have Trump and his boogyman persona to campaign against which means they could be potentially facing a GOP candidate who is arguably better than Trump, in other words, they'll have their shyt together, no political or legal baggage holding them back, no perceptions of being a clown or a joke but rather someone who can legitimately win the votes of the people based on merit, basically a worthy adversary.

It's hard to say if the Democrats have a candidate that's good enough to restore the feelings of '08 and '12. I'm not convinced that Newsom, who people keep drooling over, can get it done, and Whitmer, unless she's a VP option, the Dems would be setting themselves up for another loss to run her as a #1 because America simply isn't ready nor interested in appointing a woman as the leader of the country.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,712
Reputation
4,757
Daps
122,676
Reppin
Detroit
Better than Clinton, Biden, harris, or Newsome :manny:

Dems better run a progressive or just get used to more republican presidenties. Cause it's getting harder to sell the lessor of two evils thing when the majority of people are struggling. Struggling less or "anyone but trump" ain't fixing the problems that have been here decades. But my faith in the democrats ain't high they'll make the right decision. All I cam do is my part in showing out for the primaries, but I got a bad feeling another L is on the way :francis:

I'd vote for AOC is a second, but the GOP would just run any random white guy and automatically win.
 
Last edited:

Westbama Heartthrob

Irregular Zero
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
12,834
Reputation
6,845
Daps
55,169
Reppin
Black Belt
I'd vote for AOC is a second, but the GOP will would just run any random white guy and automatically win.
Even the Republicans gonna need more than that. Going back to regular republican platform gonna piss the MAGA crowd off

And it might be to the point where we see another January 6 except bigger and bolder. I don't put nothing past these cacs and whoever is running things behind the scenes. Trump's ties to Russian interference looking less and less like conspiracy by the day. And if being openly fascist got the rethugs this far, why stop now?

The Jeb bush or Romney types just aint gonna cut it no more. Which is why them democrats need to provide an actual alternative instead of centrist bullshyt :beli:
 
Top