Are 50 Point Games Dying Off?

[Goatpoacher]

This thread is about 50 point games. And in those 25 50+ point games, he's shot about 50% in 19 of them. With 3 of the 6 below 50% games being at 49%.

Now compare those to Jordan's 50 point games that I already listed. If you are putting up 50 points, you better be shooting at least 50 percent.

If you put up 47 shots, you should make more than 17 of them.

Kobe = inefficient chucker.

 

[Swagnificent]

Now compare those to Jordan's 50 point games that I already listed. If you are putting up 50 points, you better be shooting at least 50 percent.

If you put up 47 shots, you should make more than 17 of them.

Kobe = inefficient chucker.

so you talking about one game

remember Kobe dropped 81 on just 46 shots

Jordan's career high was 49 shots in 1993 and he got nowhere near 80 points

 

[Illuminatos]

LeBron could easily score 50 but he'd just rather be a team player and score 25-30 while also getting his teammates involved. Which is why the Heat are so dominant. The W is all that matters anyways.

But of course ignorant Chuckee stans will never grasp that concept and would prefer flash over substance. Which is why they'll be watching their father chuck his way to 30 a night while leading their trash team to the 9th seed for the next two seasons.

 

[Swagnificent]

@Swagnificent is easily the worst poster in the coliseum by a mile

maybe to you Kobe haters cause I destroy all ya'll arguments

 

[Goatpoacher]

so you talking about one game

remember Kobe dropped 81 on just 46 shots

Jordan's career high was 49 shots in 1993 and he got nowhere near 80 points

Kobe dropped 41 on 47 shots.

Jordan never did that

Jordan's 40 plus and 50 plus games were more efficient than Kobe.

Kobe's led you queer children into believing that high scoring games come at the cost of efficiency. Since you are retarded, you buy it. The bisexual cowboy who made this thread, in the first post, implicitly accepted as a premise that a focus on efficiency means you score low points. Even Kobe and AI have had efficient 50 point games. But to score 40 points on 40 plus shots? THat's just stupid.

 

[Illuminatos]

Kobe's led you queer children into believing that high scoring games come at the cost of efficiency. Since you are retarded, you buy it. The bisexual cowboy who made this thread, in the first post, implicitly accepted as a premise that a focus on efficiency means you score low points. Even Kobe and AI have had efficient 50 point games. But to score 40 points on 40 plus shots? THat's just stupid.

It's disgusting. Take this fakkit for example.

you have these fakkit impressionable young guys trying to impress white stat nerds and get called efficient

no wonder why the game is so boring.

This clown basically said that being efficient is for white stat nerds.

They're not real basketball fans. They just want to see some guy freeze out his teammates and shoot 50 shots a game because that's "exciting."

Meanwhile you have LeBron dropping 18/18/10, 27/7/8, 32/10/11 and 37/12 in the Finals and gets called "boring."

 

[dunkman6]

This thread was never about Kobe, but then these anti-Kobe people came in here mad when his name was mentioned and proceeded to ruin what was a pretty decent debate going on. Thanks for ruining another thread.

Actually it's the contrary. I can see someone using Kobe as a point. but he was only bought up for the sake of stan wars.

 

[Stealth]

There has never been a perimeter player in NBA history as potent and complete as a player on the offensive end than bean. This is a ridiculous conversation

congrats breh you just solidified yourself as the third biggest kobe stan on the forum with this terrible deplorable post

doesn't even warrant a counter reply

and just to comment on the post you made earlier say how kobe was so unstoppable in 06, if he was so unstoppable and other teams couldn't contain him why tf didn't his efficiency eclipse the 50% mark? Or even be near 50%?

 

[Goatpoacher]

Actually it's the contrary. I can see someone using Kobe as a point. but he was only bought up for the sake of stan wars.

Exactly. We see right through this bullshyt. Cowgirl was basically saying "Kobe was so great because he scored alot, and Lebron sucks because he tries to be efficient."

PS: Kobe hasn't scored 50 in about 5 years. Jordan was scoring 50 at age 39. Who's the better scorer again?

 

[Swagnificent]

Kobe dropped 41 on 47 shots.

Jordan never did that

Jordan's 40 plus and 50 plus games were more efficient than Kobe.

Kobe's led you queer children into believing that high scoring games come at the cost of efficiency. Since you are retarded, you buy it. The bisexual cowboy who made this thread, in the first post, implicitly accepted as a premise that a focus on efficiency means you score low points. Even Kobe and AI have had efficient 50 point games. But to score 40 points on 40 plus shots? THat's just stupid.

your still ignoring my point. Kobe took 46 shots and scored 81 points. Jordan took 49 shots and scored ???

lets put it this way, Kobe at his best is better than Jordan ever was (81 points in a game, 62 in 3, 50+ for 4 straight games, etc.)

 

[dunkman6]

Exactly. We see right through this bullshyt. Cowgirl was basically saying "Kobe was so great because he scored alot, and Lebron sucks because he tries to be efficient."

PS: Kobe hasn't scored 50 in about 5 years. Jordan was scoring 50 at age 39. Who's the better scorer again?

the person who has 10 scoring titles in 12 seasons

 

[Goatpoacher]

your still ignoring my point. Kobe took 46 shots and scored 81 points. Jordan took 49 shots and scored ???

lets put it this way, Kobe at his best is better than Jordan ever was (81 points in a game, 62 in 3, 50+ for 4 straight games, etc.)

Let's put it this way. You are a misleading idiot who wants to have sex with kobe bryant. Kobe's BEST came against the league's WORST. JOrdan's best came against the league's best. Kobe is a front-running stat padder. That's why he can't be THE BEST in teh fukking playoffs when it matters.

 

[dunkman6]

your still ignoring my point. Kobe took 46 shots and scored 81 points. Jordan took 49 shots and scored ???

lets put it this way, Kobe at his best is better than Jordan ever was (81 points in a game, 62 in 3, 50+ for 4 straight games, etc.)

so by your logic brandon jennings best is better than dirk's cause brandon jennings scored 55 and dirk scored 53?

 

[Swagnificent]

Let's put it this way. You are a misleading idiot who wants to have sex with kobe bryant. Kobe's BEST came against the league's WORST. JOrdan's best came against the league's best. Kobe is a front-running stat padder. That's why he can't be THE BEST in teh fukking playoffs when it matters.

5 rings says otherwise. You need me to bump back up his numbers during the 3 straight finals he led the lakers to during the tail end of his prime (08-10). Imagine if PRIME Kobe circa 05-07 had a decent supporting cast. The fact he was dropping 30/6/5 in his 30s shows that he woulda tore up the league during the playoffs during his prime.

 

[Illuminatos]

There has never been a perimeter player in NBA history as potent and complete as a player on the offensive end than bean. This is a ridiculous conversation

lets put it this way, Kobe at his best is better than Jordan ever was

I can't take this anymore. This is just ridiculous. These Kobe Stans are getting out of line now.