Goatpoacher
Superstar
5 rings says otherwise. You need me to bump back up his numbers during the 3 straight finals he led the lakers to during the tail end of his prime (08-10). Imagine if PRIME Kobe circa 05-07 had a decent supporting cast.The fact he was dropping 30/6/5 in his 30s shows that he woulda tore up the league during the playoffs during his prime.
Kobe makes his supporting cast look worst. Look at the lakers sharing the ball this season before the Cancer returned, then they all look like shyt afterwards.
Kobe's ballhogging is a DETRIMENT, not a positive thing for his team. Bear in mind that in 2001, the lakers had a better record WITHOUT kobe than with kobe.
The fact he was dropping 30/6/5 in his 30s shows that he woulda tore up the league during the playoffs during his prime.
Swagnificent taking on practically the whole board out chea. :mambasalute:
. Scoring 100 was a big deal. You had 3 or 4 teams in the whole league giving you 100 every night. Compared to half the league doing it now. Whole teams are scoring now, not just one guy. Everybody is displaying their dominance and athleticism, not just one guy. What makes one guy doing it more exciting then everybody on the court doing it?
That's like saying I prefer songs where only one guy has a nice verse or I prefer movies where only one of the actors performs well.
I'm not sure what the problem is.
. I loved the 1 star per team era/iso ball era, but imo the league is much deeper with talent now, 1 guy doesn't have to score all the points for his squad to win.
