murksiderock
Superstar
I recognize your name from there
I don't think an area has to look like NYC to be urban, I consider the Jersey cities, Philly, Baltimore, and others to be largely urban.
But I think an area that looks like Levittown can't be urban even if it's in a major city.
NYC started going quasi-suburban in the 50s so I'm not surprised it's that high. Manhattan is 100% urban, but the postwar neighborhoods in the outer boroughs are not purely urban and cater a lot to drivers.
Your mistake is comparing someplace to a Levittown because it has a similar population density as a Levittown, when it doesn't function like a Levittown...

I use the hood definition of urban and suburban. San Francisco is suburban.


