BelowTheMasonDixon
Veteran
No. Because chances are she knew this nikka was a cheater before she got married. Very rarely is cheating like some movie shyt.
my bad.
Baby girl, we're talking about the biology of men and women. Things that aren't apart of the biology of men and women do not matter in a purely biological discussion. Do you understand what a person's biological make up is?
Most dudes I know would seriously hurt a dude who cheated on their mom/daughter. I think you are doing a lot of projecting.This is what I'm talking about. Men need to be more honest with our women. When our daughters and sisters get cheated on it really don't affect us the way you think it does. We're more annoyed when we find out they're dating street nikkas then a nikka out here getting it that dips into some side from time to time. We evaluate men as if they're men, if this man holding the fam down, we honestly could give af less about some dumb female shyt like who that nikka fukking on the side![]()
This whole section has meI found out an old friend of mine cheated on his wife. When he came over the crib, I told him I was mad at him and for him not to say one word to me. After the game went off, I pranced over to the door, opened it, and stared into space. He said "I guess I should leave, huh?" I replied "mmm hmm" and he left.
Don't cheat on your wife, u fukkin idiots
Yes we are talking about biology. And your argument is that because men can have 100 babies at a time, and women can have one at a time (excluding the cases of twins etc.) that men are polygamous and women are monogamous. First of all, this is a circular argument in itself. Having multiple children at once does not prove polygamy, and by starting the argument on that basis it was not lost on me that you were attempting to use circular logic to prove your point. But its incorrect, since we all know a person can sire no children/not get pregnant and still sleep around and be polygamous. But since you chose that point, I decided to let you know that even if we accepted that faulty logic, your point still doesn't hold up.
That came in me saying that having multiple children at once is not a biological advantage regardless because you actually have to care for those children. Therefore having 100 at once, or even 100 over time makes no sense and is more of a burden than an advantage. I also said it is not a reflection of polygamy because women can equally still sleep around, aka be polygamous in nature, while pregnant.
I'm honestly not going to bother reading the rest of your post because no offense but I'm sure its just as uninformed and baseless as the rest of your posts have been. You have not provided any scientific facts to back up your logic, all while demanding they be provided to you and then dodging them when they are.
The fact that you haven't even bothered to do a simple google search and answer some of your rudimentary questions about female biology tells me this debate would continue to go nowhere fast. But I'm certainly not going to continue to repeat myself in different ways for your understanding. If you decide to do any research and learn more about what you speak, feel free to quote me with real facts at another time.
Until then though, I refuse to waste time debating someone who obviously doesn't know what they're talking about.
Most dudes I know would seriously hurt a dude who cheated on their mom/daughter. I think you are doing a lot of projecting.
I know it to be so in a few of those cases. You're detectment from women isn't a reflect of all men.I mean I'm sure that's what they tell you.![]()
I know it to be so in a few of those cases. You're detected from women isn't a reflect of all men.