nikkas haven't seen enough movies. The first was a derivative of a derivative.
this is more common than i thought and it's making me uncomfortable. the first avatar was long and boring. it's also a rip off of pocahontas/dances with wolves.
nikkas haven't seen enough movies. The first was a derivative of a derivative.
this is more common than i thought and it's making me uncomfortable. the first avatar was long and boring. it's also a rip off of pocahontas/dances with wolves.
I have still never seen Avatar
this is more common than i thought and it's making me uncomfortable. the first avatar was long and boring. it's also a rip off of pocahontas/dances with wolves.
And he’s making 7 of these terrible films. Lol.
Only five films have reached that mark in history.
I think it’ might hit that seeing as marvel probably ain’t gonna have no movie releasing hitting that either and people are going to fiend for an over the top cgi spectacle like they had with the avengersThat makes more sense as that 2 billion number sounded totally unrealistic. If that was the case, then I'd be curious to hear the number that Fast X needs to break even
Even then, I still think that it's going to struggle to hit that $800 million domestic box office number.
Are we still taking random tweets as gospel truth now?
I believe the last one though.
So the title was just click baitAll those links are about a GQ interview he did
Why quote the whole post and not click the links
![]()
This is what’s funny about these directors who diss comic book movies. James Cameron needed $$$$$ and over a decade to churn out a sequel to Smurf’s in space. A CGI fest with a lifted plot that’s pretty much interchangeable with video game cut scenes.
What a genius! Look at all this depth and real acting! Nothing like Marvel. *looks at blue people copying dances with wolves*
Don’t get me wrong; I love his movies, but he’s clearly a hater. And he’s making 7 of these terrible films. Lol.