Bernie and the Black Vote

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,074
Reputation
2,874
Daps
66,103
Reppin
NJ
Bruh, I bet Killer Mike didn't now who Bernie Sanders was 6 months ago

Just fukking stop it.

Its too late for him to make any inroads by becoming an overnight populist.

You can't win national elections without doing ground work in non-white communities anymore.

Be happy black people didn't turn GOP and keep it moving.

Any Bill Maher fan is aware of Bernie for years now... Bill been telling him to run since 2012....
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
But the faith part is really interesting. I have no problem with any religious affiliation ( I'm Cathloic). But Hillary social polices are identical to Bernie Sanders.

1) Both Pro gay marriage
2) Both believe in a women right to choose
3) Both advocate a separation of church and state.

* Actually Hillary Clinton has said she looks up to Margaret Sander ( Creator of Planned Parenthood).

That's why this is puzzling.

Your issue is believing people who are voting for Bernie are obsessed with social issues and not economic ones.

I'm also sadden that you care about Margaret Sanger a eugenicist who wanted to exterminate black people.

Fact Check: Was Planned Parenthood Started To 'Control' The Black Population?
 

Anerdyblackguy

Knicks in 4
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
65,461
Reputation
18,929
Daps
362,627
Your issue is believing people who are voting for Bernie are obsessed with social issues and not economic ones.

I'm also sadden that you care about Margaret Sanger a eugenicist who wanted to exterminate black people.

Fact Check: Was Planned Parenthood Started To 'Control' The Black Population?

Um, what? I was debating about social issues because thats what most church goers sometimes use as a guide ( See George bush in 2004) in their voting process.

When did I say I cared about Margaret Sanger? I was just saying Hillary is an adamant supporter of hers, which people in the faith community should know about.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
Um, what? I was debating about social issues because thats what most church goers sometimes use as a guide ( See George bush in 2004) in their voting process.

When did I say I cared about Margaret Sanger? I was just saying Hillary is an adamant supporter of hers, which people in the faith community should know about.

My bad I read that wrong.

Sorry!
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
Um, what? I was debating about social issues because thats what most church goers sometimes use as a guide ( See George bush in 2004) in their voting process.

When did I say I cared about Margaret Sanger? I was just saying Hillary is an adamant supporter of hers, which people in the faith community should know about.

Yeah I read it.

They analyzed Margaret Sangers positions and tried to disprove she was a eugenicist and a racist.

Regardless to their attempts they said this very clearly:

"That Sanger was enamored and supported some eugenicists' ideas is certainly true,"

I posted the NPR source because I wanted a source people would trust.

Any black person who can sustain their mind that Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist but also be ok with her has issues to me.

You might be one of those people since you seem to be implying that it's ok that Margaret was a eugenicist but she wasn't the bad kind as the NPR article is implying. . .

Here's a paragraph from the article for others to read:

Did Margaret Sanger believe in eugenics?
Fact Check: Was Planned Parenthood Started To 'Control' The Black Population?

Yes, but not in the way Carson implied.

Eugenics was a discipline, championed by prominent scientists but now widely debunked, that promoted "good" breeding and aimed to prevent "poor" breeding. The idea was that the human race could be bettered through encouraging people with traits like intelligence, hard work, cleanliness (thought to be genetic) to reproduce. Eugenics was taken to its horrifying extreme during the Holocaust, through forced sterilizations and breeding experiments.

In the United States, eugenics intersected with the birth control movement in the 1920s, and Sanger reportedly spoke at eugenics conferences. She also talked about birth control being used to facilitate "the process of weeding out the unfit [and] of preventing the birth of defectives."

Historians seem to disagree on just how involved in the eugenics movement she was. Some contend her involvement was for political reasons — to win support for birth control.

In reading her papers, it is clear Sanger had bought into the movement. She once wrote that "consequences of breeding from stock lacking human vitality always will give us social problems and perpetuate institutions of charity and crime."

"That Sanger was enamored and supported some eugenicists' ideas is certainly true," said Susan Reverby, a health care historian and professor at Wellesley College. But, Reverby added, Sanger's main argument was not eugenics — it was that "Sanger thought people should have the children they wanted."

It was a radical idea for the time.

Sanger wrote about this mission herself in 1921: "The almost universal demand for practical education in Birth Control is one of the most hopeful signs that the masses themselves today possess the divine spark of regeneration."

Was Sanger "not particularly enamored with black people"?

Sanger's birth control movement did have support in black neighborhoods, beginning in the '20s when there were leagues in Harlem started by African-Americans. Sanger also worked closely with NAACP founder W.E.B. DuBois on a "Negro Project," which she viewed as a way to get safe contraception to African-Americans.

In 1946, Sanger wrote about the importance of giving "Negro" parents a choice in how many children they would have.

"The Negro race has reached a place in its history when every possible effort should be made to have every Negro child count as a valuable contribution to the future of America," she wrote. "Negro parents, like all parents, must create the next generation from strength, not from weakness; from health, not from despair."

Her attitude toward African-Americans can certainly be viewed as paternalistic, but there is no evidence she subscribed to the more racist ideas of the time or that she coerced black women into using birth control. In fact, for her time, as the Washington Post noted, "she would likely be considered to have advanced views on race relations."
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
Yea, dude beasted on this. Only thing is, he put in the nicest way possible, that black people are front runners. Which makes sense. The idea that we can't afford to gamble is real.

I personally don't understand this line of thinking (and I'm not even applying this argument to the Democratic primary, because I think that is a ridiculous exaggeration).

When you have little or nothing to lose, I feel it makes sense to take "risks." To quote El Chapo, "In this life, he who risks nothing cannot win."
 

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,727
Reputation
1,500
Daps
50,003
Qualitatively speaking this is a nice slogan that I suppose has some merit. Quantitatively speaking, the Nader vote absolutely handed the presidency to George Bush, and the results were disastrous. Black folks more than any other group paid the real world cost of republican "leadership" in the 2000s.

This country has been locked in far right wing inertia for decades. A socialist candidate from Vermont is a tough sell, and logically you must at least recognize this. If you're confident that the country will "feel the burn" in the general, and that Sanders will turn America into a scandinavian economy overnight by mesmerizing the house with his revolutionary mind control then so be it. I like Sanders, and I align much stronger with he than Clinton ideologically. Im not anti-Sanders.

Again, all my post was attempting to do was outline why others feel differently, and why they may be reluctant to throw their support behind Sanders. The point is that the popular racist theorem being bandied about: that blacks are mindlessly supporting clinton much to the expense of their interests because they are still under the sway of Bill Clinton playing the sax on Arsenio 25 years ago, makes my blood boil.
But no bammer, black people more than any other group paid the real world cost of the Clinton Administration in the 90s as well
 

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,727
Reputation
1,500
Daps
50,003
This post alludes to sanders having issues attracting all minority voters. This is not so. He is splitting the Latino vote where he campaigns. He's very popular with Asian voters as well. It's specifically a problem with his support among black people.

He's had success winning the heavily catholic vote and the more religious white working class. He actually loses among the least religious demographic, rich whites liberals. The religious argument makes most sense to me as a matter of political organization. The black church is an organizing aspect of political life in a way the Catholic Church and white Protestant church isn't.

I think there's something to the idea that black historical pessimism about the American ideal affects the ability for populist political anger to ferment
Is it b/c Catholics tend to be more educated?
 
Top