so my boys were that duo, Robert Horry the only reason Nash don't have a ring... that's why I'm like Fucc Robert Horry for life, hip checkin bish...
![]()

Spoken like somebody that only watched Nets games.Nope
Superior rebounding - other than rattling off the numbers, what can you tell me about Kidd's rebounding and what effect it had on the game?
I got a case load.
Jason Kidd did a lot of things that didn't show up on the stat sheet.
They had Stephon Marbury the year before putting up like 22/8 on 44% shooting and how well they do?
Breh your better than this
Kidds rebounding is what sparked those nets fast breaks. That teams strength was in its running and defense (which rebounding is a part of)
Is he an all-time great PG? Yeah but that's mostly because he played in the league for nearly 20 seasons and benefited from playing during a certain period where the backdrop of the position was more traditional. If he began his career over the last few seasons he wouldn't be a top 5 PG in the league today because he wouldn't get away with dominating the ball in the fashion he did while putting up average scoring #s on horrific shooting percentages while orchestrating middle-of-the-pack offenses.
2001/02 Nets - 17th ranked offfense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2002/03 Nets - 18th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2003/04 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2004/05 Nets - 26th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2005/06 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2006/07 Nets - 16th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2007/08 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
Every season he was in New Jersey dominating the ball, they had average to one of the worst offenses, season in season out - that's not the mark of a GREAT floor general - that's the mark of player whose suffocation on possessions and inability to be a reliable scorer and a threat as one (he averaged 14.4 points per game on 39.4% shooting during his seven-season stay in NJ) limited those Nets teams on what they could do offensively.
The success that team had was all down to their team defense and playing in the Eastern conference, during its weakest period.
And to follow on from that @GoddamnyamanProf, over those seven seasons in NJ, these were the points he produced per 100 possessions:
103 (ranked 40th amongst all point guards)
106 (ranked 28th amongst all point guards)
102 (ranked 32nd amongst all point guards)
107 (ranked 28th amongst all point guards)
110 (ranked 18th amongst all point guards)
111 (ranked 15th amongst all point guards)
101 (ranked 46th amongst all point guards)
So for all this 'floor general' rhetoric that's shrouded in nostalgia, the numbers he was producing were actually your typical run-of-the-mill PG, not this great, all-encompassing, visionary PG that he was made out to be.
The Nets would've been a better team if Marbury stayed in NJ (instead of Kidd). Injuries fukked them in 2000.Marbury played with a totally different team that season

If they were in the West, this thread wouldn't have even been created. Kidd would've been a footnote amongst all the all-time great PGs.Lakers and Spurs were obviously better. Mavs and Kings were so much better offensively and had more wins record-wise. Then teams like Portland-Utah-Minnesota who were on NJ's level in terms of team record. All in that conference.
Not sure how you could argue the Nets being flat out better than any of the teams listedthey relied on defense and a relatively slow pace. Granted Kidd was their best all-around player and was insanely valuable to them but that doesn't make them better than at least 5 teams in the WC.
And the smart dumb comments keep on coming.....J Kidd/K Mart ...they made it to the finals...cp3 and Blake have yet to reach such heights![]()
He played with shytty players

There's no two ways about it, Kidd hindered the offense of that team. For all those 'empty' rebounds he grabbed to initiate the offense, he did a pretty shytty job.
They had an identity as a defensive minded team, not an offensive juggernaut, and really had a style of play that suited the personnel for thatThere's no two ways about it, Kidd hindered the offense of that team. For all those 'empty' rebounds he grabbed to initiate the offense, he did a pretty shytty job.
The Nets would've been a better team if Marbury stayed in NJ (instead of Kidd). Injuries fukked them in 2000.![]()
