Better player: Curry or Iverson?

[George's Dilemma]

One got a ring, and might get another one this year. At the end of the day that's all that matters.

AI= well, see, ummmm, ughhhhh, what had happen was.........
Curry: Who's next?

 

[28 Gramz]

Steph only been elite for two seasons

 

[I.V.]

Steph only been elite for two seasons

Yes. But Iverson has never had a season comparable to what Steph has done in either of those years.

 

[the cool]

at these fakkits that still think iverson is better than steph. iverson at 46 all time, curry top 25

 

[010101]

once again
put steph on any of the squads ai carried and watch that team tank and burn

steph is the goat sniper but outside of the ideal environment gsw is providing right now he'd just be another hot handed fringe superstar

it's useless to compare chef to the gawds of the iso era playing 1v5
he's not that
chef gets his buckets within the frame work and flow of what his team does

quit tryna slight the gawds

*

 

[ManBearPig]

Those who picked Iverson probably think prime Stephon Marbury was better than Chris Paul

 

[DoubleClutch]

Yes. But Iverson has never had a season comparable to what Steph has done in either of those years.

Actually curry currently averages less assists and points than Iverson did in his SECOND best season.

The only think curry REALLY has on iverson is better efficiency

And a Ring, but his team definitely helped him get that

 

[ManBearPig]

Actually curry currently averages less assists and points than Iverson did in his SECOND best season.

The only think curry REALLY has on iverson is better efficiency

And a Ring, but his team definitely helped him get that

Compare their minutes too.


nikkaz say what u just said don't watch hoops line that and just look at individual numbers

 

[I.V.]

Actually curry currently averages less assists and points than Iverson did in his SECOND best season.

The only think curry REALLY has on iverson is better efficiency

And a Ring, but his team definitely helped him get that

Are you really ignoring the fact that Iverson took 8-10 more shots, per game to do that? Or that Curry already had a 8.5 APG season, which Iverson never sniffed?

Or that Iverson is playing is playing 25% MORE minutes to do it? Because the Warriors so routinely blow teams out, that he sits long stretches in the second half?

"The only think is efficiency" - DOG, efficiency isn't like "handle" - He's a better scorer, he's a better shooter, he's a better finisher around the hoop, he he scores more points per minute, and per possession than Iverson ever did.

You are making a foolish argument, that shows a FANTASTIC lack of understanding, even of the stats you're trying to talk about.


Iverson was great, he's one of the most exciting players ever to watch. Steph Curry is better than him, and there's no shame in that.

 

[malbaker86]

once again
put steph on any of the squads ai carried and watch that team tank and burn

steph is the goat sniper but outside of the ideal environment gsw is providing right now he'd just be another hot handed fringe superstar

it's useless to compare chef to the gawds of the iso era playing 1v5
he's not that
chef gets his buckets within the frame work and flow of what his team does

quit tryna slight the gawds

*

Put AI on these GS teams and they don't sniff the finals.

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

once again
put steph on any of the squads ai carried and watch that team tank and burn

steph is the goat sniper but outside of the ideal environment gsw is providing right now he'd just be another hot handed fringe superstar

it's useless to compare chef to the gawds of the iso era playing 1v5
he's not that
chef gets his buckets within the frame work and flow of what his team does

quit tryna slight the gawds

*

 

[DoubleClutch]

Are you really ignoring the fact that Iverson took 8-10 more shots, per game to do that? Or that Curry already had a 8.5 APG season, which Iverson never sniffed?

Or that Iverson is playing is playing 25% MORE minutes to do it? Because the Warriors so routinely blow teams out, that he sits long stretches in the second half?

"The only think is efficiency" - DOG, efficiency isn't like "handle" - He's a better scorer, he's a better shooter, he's a better finisher around the hoop, he he scores more points per minute, and per possession than Iverson ever did.

You are making a foolish argument, that shows a FANTASTIC lack of understanding, even of the stats you're trying to talk about.


Iverson was great, he's one of the most exciting players ever to watch. Steph Curry is better than him, and there's no shame in that.

Let's see curry lead the league in scoring once, and then three more times before saying he's a better scorer.

Curry relies heavily on threes so he yea he scores more on less shots naturally. And he's more efficient cause he's just a better outside shooter. I think most would agree he's the best all time.

On top of this, He has great teammates to set him up for easy shots/open looks and occupy defenses from focusing on him.

Curry sits because the WARRIORS are a good team not because he's that great of a player.

Iverson never had that luxury so he had to work much harder for his points. He took more shots/more contested shots and lay ups. of course he missed more. But he always found ways to score. And he scored in more creative dynamic ways than currys because his size, speed, athleticism and handle.

Iversons a better one on on isolation player. He was the whole offense.
That's why they called him the Answer

Curry is a great team scorer who scores within the offense. He's good working with teammates

Curry Has Klay whenever he's having an off night and draymonds the team leader


Iverson was klay Draymond and curry on his Sixers teams.

Plus iverson could actually dunk

 

[the cool]

Let's see curry lead the league in scoring once, and then three more times before saying he's a better scorer.

Curry relies heavily on threes so he yea he scores more on less shots naturally. And he's more efficient cause he's just a better outside shooter. I think most would agree he's the best all time.

On top of this, He has great teammates to set him up for easy shots/open looks and occupy defenses from focusing on him.

Curry sits because the WARRIORS are a good team not because he's that great of a player.

Iverson never had that luxury so he had to work much harder for his points. He took more shots/more contested shots and lay ups. of course he missed more. But he always found ways to score. And he scored in more creative dynamic ways than currys because his size, speed, athleticism and handle.

Iversons a better one on on isolation player. He was the whole offense.
That's why they called him the Answer

Curry is a great team scorer who scores within the offense. He's good working with teammates

Curry Has Klay whenever he's having an off night and draymonds the team leader


Iverson was klay Draymond and curry on his Sixers teams.

Plus iverson could actually dunk

#WOAT2016

One of the dumbest posts I ever read on thecoli

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

I'm an AI stan but curry is better.

 

[Fani Willis fan]

A superstar shooting under 40% is suspect, but they surrounded him with defensive stoppers and let him be a one man show on O

a flabby Webber is the best 2nd option he had in his prime.


Id still take Curry tho, its just more logical in todays NBA