TeenTitansGo
Banned
I wont say too much because this should be obvious but this has nothing to do with white women really..
I don't understand. Does it have to do with bm?
I wont say too much because this should be obvious but this has nothing to do with white women really..
To a lesser extent, yes. To a larger extent, no.I don't understand. Does it have to do with bm?
White women could own land, human property, etc...and the ironic thing about this is: Black men weren't the majority of black slaveowners...I believe the ability to own other human beings supersedes any of this.FREE MEN WERE ALLOWED TO OWN LAND. IF YOU FOUND A WAY TO GAIN FREEDOM YOU WERE ALLOWED TO OWN LAND. IF YOU HAD ANY PROVEN WHITE DESCENDANTS YOU WERE ALLOWED TO VOTE UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. THE FIRST FREE MAN IN MY FAMILY IN AMERICA HAD A WHITE FATHER(RAPED HIS MOTHER). HE BOUGHT HIS FREEDOM AND WAS ALLOWED TO OWN LAND AND VOTE. I HAVE PROOF OF HIS REGISTRATION FROM THE CENSUS BUREAU. HE WAS LEGALLY ALLOWED TO VOTE BECAUSE HIS BIRTH CERT HAD HIS WHITE FATHER'S NAME ON IT. HE WAS LEGALLY A WHITE MAN BUT HE WAS DARKER THAN I AM. WHEN I DID MY ORIGINAL SEARCH FOR MY ANCESTORS I HAD A BIG PROBLEM BECAUSE I ASSUMED THAT THE WHITE MAN WAS JUST THE OWNER AND THE ROAD ENDED THERE. I WAS FOLLOWING THE LINE DOWN THE FATHER'S SIDE. I DIDN'T FIND THE TRUTH OUT UNTIL I WENT DOWN BOTH PATHS.
THAT'S WHY I SAID THERE ARE 1 OR 2 REASONS WHERE IT CAN HAPPEN. THEY ARE TRYING TO STAND ON THIS RARE OCCURRENCE AND SAY THAT THE RULES ALLOWED IT. TECHNICALLY IT DID ALLOW IT BUT I DIDN'T HAPPEN OFTEN DUE TO CORRUPTION AND LACK OF WAYS TO PROVE LINEAGE.
A FREE BLACK MAN WITH THAT STATUS DID HAVE SOME PRIVILEGE OVER WHITE WOMEN BUT IT WOULD ONLY BE SEEN AS SUCH FROM THE EYES OF A WHITE WOMAN. THE GRASS IS ALWAYS GREENER...
One person or a couple of people saying this isnt a big deal. That's the problem with Twitter, it makes people who are nobodies seem like a bigger deal than they are.
Black men are just a favorite punching bag online. It's nothing new. Offline I think most people aren't bothered with this phantom black Male supremacy.
well it's not affecting madden, the general p*ssy supply, the ability to simp, or nikkas ability to "I got mine, so I'm good"...This is the same mindset that got brehs messed up with the "black men are the white men of the community ".Bm didn't know it would've got that much attention.![]()
White women could own land, human property, etc...and the ironic thing about this is: Black men weren't the majority of black slaveowners...I believe the ability to own other human beings supersedes any of this.
Now: Could you tell me what privilege and freedom black men had that white women didn't?
The vote shyt is a whole joke and the TRUE right to vote for both sexes of the black race didn't happen until the 60s.
Your anecdotal story is mad rare and circumstantial.
black men couldn't, either...in the VAST majority of states unless he was a MULATTO or somehow got manumitted.WHITE WOMEN COULD NOT OWN LAND THAT WAS NOT DEEDED TO THEM BY A MAN IN MOST STATES AT THAT TIME. WOMEN COULD RECEIVE LAND ONLY THROUGH ESTATE TRANSFERENCE. IT COULD NOT BE SOLD TO THEM. THAT'S HOW HE GOT HIS LAND. THE MAN'S WIFE COULD NOT TAKE POSSESSION OF THE LAND BECAUSE THROUGH PROBATE BECAUSE THE LAND IS DEEDED TO THE FIRST BORN MALE. NORTH CAROLINA DID NOT HAVE POWER OF ATTORNEY LAWS AT THAT TIME. WITH NO WILL THE LAND GOES TO THE SON OF THE MAN.
THIS WAS ON A STATE BY STATE BASIS. THE STORY IS RARE BUT IT HAPPENED AND THEY WERE USING IT TO FUND THEIR BS. I SAID THIS IN THE ORIGINAL STATEMENT.
This is a good question. Rejecting it ideologically enmass is a start. And rejecting those who attempt to align it with the social and economic progress of black people. Many of these people agree with WS ideologies, like white feminism, that is how it is allowed to fester. If black folks said, we're not with you and stay out of our business they wouldn't be allowed to get in.So how do we fix this? How do we prevent white feminism from being applied to black social structures?
black men couldn't, either...in the VAST majority of states unless he was a MULATTO or somehow got manumitted.
The majority of manumittees and black people who owned slaves...WERE NOT MEN.
I mean, male privilege was definitely a thing back then regardless of social status, however it's disingenuous to compare the privilege of male slaves to white women. I understand the underlying comparison of womanhood to chattel, but that in itself dismisses a non-enslaved woman's own agency. And I say "non-enslaved" because what does that argument say about enslaved women? Are they saying there's no difference???
![]()


Mulatto WAS a racial classification, especially in those times. White women headed plantations. You need to STOPTHE COMPARISON WAS BLACK MEN VS. WHITE WOMEN. THE BLACK MEN WHO DID HAVE LAND AND VOTED WERE CONSIDERED BLACK. MULATTO WAS NOT A RACE. THOSE MEN WERE BLACK BY SOCIETY'S DEFINITION. THINGS LIKE THE 1 DROP RULE WERE THOUGHT UP TO COMBAT THIS FROM HAPPENING.
ALL I DID IS POINT OUT THE SOURCE OF WHY THEY FELT THAT WAY. I DIDN'T AGREE WITH IT. I EVEN SAID IT WAS BS MORE THAN ONCE.