You are clueless. Back in the day the culture was for men to be married and do whatever it took to take care of their wife and kids. shyt aint like that no more, nikkas are even apalled at having to pay chikd support for their own seed
But back then nikkas were singing about love and happiness and accepted the responsibility of what it meant to lead without worrying about what women were doing. Do you honestly think if nikkas got back to that women wouldn't ride with that shyt? Y'all acting like bytches are protesting against every nikka that want to get married. Just making up lies to cover up short comings. Broads are thirsty, any black man claiming he's trying to get married and just can't find a black woman who would want that is either a damn lie or actively trying to wife hoodrats like the broad from the pic a couple pages back.
And I do have a daughter. Ima tell her to be on her
steez cause nuggas is determined to run their lives into the ground and trying to force everybody from white folks to women to stop them. Then getting mad when they don't
You are simply out of touch with reality.
Honestly, I'm beginning to think that those who are holding the black community from getting ahead aren't just women who fail to take responsibility for themselves, but the males who come up with one excuse after another to ignore the fact that many of them just have assbackwards priorities. It's becoming pretty clear that many of you nikkaz are the first line of defense.
Women back then had choices just as they do today. There were nikkaz running the streets who weren't marriage material and they were NOT the most prized males worthy of procreating with like they are today. Back then, women EXPECTED to be married, and THEN have children. The man was EXPECTED to have a job and to help raise the children. If you came at a black woman in the 60s without a square job and EXPECTING to get laid without getting married,you were definately NOT considered worth the time or effort. NOW you no longer need a job, or a marriage proposal (let alone be marriage material) . It has nothing to do with "needs" but everything to do with priorities.
And it's not a question if "men wanted"....we already know what some of those guys DON'T want. That's a point that quite a few of you fail to acknowledge.
There are MEN who are worthy of procreating with and there are men who aren't.
Is it that hard to understand?
What some men are "emphasizing" on here is for women to LEAVE those men who are not worthy of procreating with.
If he's a bum LEAVE him alone. Don't try to rehab him, it's not worth the time energy or heachache.
Why some of you spend your energy on trying to get men with
bad intentions to some how clean up their acts after the fact, rather than to preach for women simply choose men with
good intentions is simply beyond me, especially when they are the ones who are suffering the most from all of this.
They want the upwardly mobile to help the hoodrats solve all their b*stard children's problems. They also want the upwardly mobile to tell the dead beats how to be real men...
