Black People need to dead this "P.O.C./Intersectionality" bullsh1t.

[Lana del Rey]

@Roddy Right you're like obsessed me right now. Such a weirdo. I just want to know when you gonna go kill yourself. Please tell me before you do.

 

[Supreme HD]

No

The coli is full of stupid and ignorant people. Some nikkas on here are stuck on stupid

 

[godkiller]

@Roddy Right you're like obsessed me right now. Such a weirdo. I just want to know when you gonna go kill yourself. Please tell me before you do.

You're the one who seems to know everything I've ever posted. The obsessed one is you. I'm just exposing you as an idiot and a c00n. You still haven't proven I "crap on black women", or if I do, why you're still on a forum where everybody does. You're just a merry-go-round of c00nery and confusion. But I digress.

 

[havoc]

Every time I hear that word "intersectionality" ..its always a black chick with locks and a White boyfriend saying it.

 

[Free White & 21]

You expect others to drop a significant part of their identity to join a movement in which you don't have to forego anything? If asked to join hands with economically oppressed whites to combat the brutal economic oppression, would you so easily drop your race based concerns?

Racist Poor Cac:

So basically I wanna fight class inequality and the ****** wants to fight me first?

Not only that, even tho we're both poor and oppressed, he won't help me fight class inequality unless we resolve our intra-class racial issues first?

Even tho class supremacy is the reason we have these issues in the first place?

You can't be serious with this disingenuous, deflective bullshyt

I never said i wanted any OTHERS (non blacks) to join in and support the BLACK struggle or help us gain BLACK EMPOWERMENT

I don't care about class issues because i'm not a liberal dipshyt tryna soft shoe white supremacy's foot in black folks asses

Get this thru your skull nikka - BLACK FIRST. All that sectarian bullshyt you talkin can kick rocks

 

[BmoreGorilla]

The issue is that you're a dumb ghetto bytch. @Poitier , @1984 and the rest of posters all exemplify and restate the same opinions here. So if you don't like the Coli and poster sentiments, get the fukk outta here and stop stalking people like a disgruntled hoodrat. Nobody cares that some moronic ho doesn't like what is said about black women. Whether I commented on white porn stars once is irrelevant and has no bearing on the fact you're an aint shyt gargoyle bytch. I'll continue keeping my foot on the neck of you c00ns.

You probably wish you were the girl in your avatar because even though she's ugly, at least she's better-looking than you.

Some of y'all wild

 

[Absalom's Thought]

.

 

[Rarebird77]

People have to choose what to focus on. Despite what some say, you have to choose which issues to tackle. Intersectionality splinters identity and separates Black men, women, gay, immigrant, poor, etc into separate movements.

That' the goal.

 

[Rarebird77]

Shut the fukk up cac. U trying your hardest to be divisive in here but nobody's falling for your bukkshyt.

I'm a black woman in here scratching my head. My main issue is with racism. . .

 

[flo]

Every time I hear that word "intersectionality" ..its always a black chick with locks and a White boyfriend saying it.

Lol the term originally meant not ignoring black women in feminism. The current definition is whatever the fukk people want it to mean.

 

[Sithlord Piff]

Lol the term originally meant not ignoring black women in feminism. The current definition is whatever the fukk people want it to mean.

The queers say you get a week now.

 

[Rarebird77]

Anyone who reads my post will tell that I make strong arguments for the illogical, ahistorical and absurd nature of your views. Essentially I argue black women benefit when black men benefit. Your argument? Nill. You make no counterargument, cac, only ad hominem . Why? Because you have no argument. You're just a cac with an axe to grind. For the above reasons, anything which a cac contrives or agrees with in a black context should be evaluated with suspicion, if not dismissed outright. Malcolm X said so too.

They don't want us to be with y'all because black men are oppressors too according to this "intersectionality" bull chit that keeps getting pushed.

This is why they can create whole videos of a white woman walking down the street being being greeted by black men and claim oppression and get black women to bandwagon on because this so called street harassment is just as bad as racism.

Imagine the quandry Emmit Till's mother would have been in.. .. her black son whistles (street harrasses) a (white) woman and is lynched because black men aren't suppose to address white women (racism). . ..

Ah intersectionality. .. . where do you leave me but confused.

 

[Absalom's Thought]

.

 

[BeeCityRoller]

The competition is exactly that; competition. We make excuses left and right because we cannot or rather don't want to accept reality; we have performed and continue to perform poorly. None of this offends me. I oppose domination of others groups (white or otherwise) because it comes at my expense, not because I'm committed to some silly sense of justice or morality. I don't expect help or understanding from no outside group; they have their own volition, their own wants, they too are competition. Yes it's black people against everyone else, as it should be. Black folks continue to have a shortsighted understanding on their own existence; the fight against "white supremacy" is but an obstacle in the way of that we should be gunning for. But how many of us even know what that is? I'll stop here, there is a lot to say but what's the point?

 

[King Kreole]

Breh, quit the flowery language and name these '' Black male centric'' issues getting unequal attention

Again, you're thinking of this the wrong way. You want me to say "Economic issues and criminal justice issues! " to which you would say "Those are both issues that affect black women and the black community as a whole ". So let me put it this way. Of course economic, criminal, social and most other kinds of racial justice all effect both black men and black women. But saying none of them are black male centric would obviously be ridiculous given the ideological foundation we're coming from. It's a disavowal of what is essentially a consensus belief in the field of Western cultural anthropology; that in gender relations, men have typically been the ones to wield prominence. For example, what is the bigger issue on the forefront of mainstream black progress right now: sexual violence or the criminal justice system? The latter. Why is that? 30% of black men have been arrested before the age of 18, yet 60% of black women have been sexually abused before they reach the age of 18. Black women make up over 50% of the black population, and they're being sexually assaulted at double the rate of black men being arrested, but we hear nary a peep about this. Why? Could it be because the call is coming from inside the house! The face of criminal justice reform is the black man, it would be disingenuous to claim otherwise. Incarceration is an issue that disproportionately effects black men, but it's not seen as a men's issue like sexual violence is seen as a women's issue. Why? Because men have a privilege of assumed centrality, and yes, that is in effect within the black community as well.

The claims of intersectionality being problematic are a conservative reaction to a new era in which women's voices, opinions and perspectives are being brought to the fore. People (men, mostly) are upset that feminism is being integrated in this new wave of pro-black ideology, because it forces us to confront problems we are complicit in. It's not just the white man that's causing problems within the black community, and acknowledging this isn't a distraction from black self-actualization, it's a necessary step. It's 2016, women are no longer content with being relegated to bystander status or being written out. They comprise over 50% of the black community. It's unacceptable to ask them to forego their valid gender concerns so that we don't have to confront our shytty behaviour. Which is what saying "fukk intersectionality, we're all black!" is doing. Because just like it would be ignorant to reduce humanity to one big race, despite what certain whites would have you believe, it would be ignorant to reduce black people to one big group. There are lines within the black community; gender being the most essential. Black men and black women have lots of commonalities, but there are also unique issues pertaining to each group. So now that women have an opportunity to affect change in a way previously withheld, why would they willingly ignore issues uniquely affecting them? Why would they turn around and shun a feminism that fought for them to even be able to be in the position to speak and make an impact? It would, in fact, be irresponsible. It's akin to asking the few black people who've broken through a racial barrier to not turn around and give voice to the others who haven't. To just tow the party line.

So i'll say it again. There can be no black self-actualization without gender equality. That's what feminist ideology is about. It's not incompatible with black progression, it's imperative. That's what intersectionality is about. Making sure we don't gloss over a marginalized in-group. Everyone lambasts white feminists for being racist and not promoting a race-equal vision of women's rights, but as soon as the scope is turned on us it's "fukk intersectionality." Laughable.