BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot dead by a sniper at event in Utah. Suspect caught, right wing weirdo

[Formerly Black Trash]

Maaaan I'm concerned for our people. They don't know what racism look like unlike its stereotypical racism.

You see a lot of this

Even here with ppl defending @the cac mamba

You think that white man hates the more model minorities but likes Black people?

 

[Ish Gibor]

ChatGPT prompt, How many Americans have been assassinated because of opposing political views:

“Here’s a timeline of major American assassinations — focusing on political leaders, activists, and public figures killed because of their political or social views:

Timeline of Political Assassinations in the U.S.

Year	Victim	Position / Role	Assassin	Motive / Political Context
1865	Abraham Lincoln	16th President	John Wilkes Booth	Confederate sympathizer; opposed Union victory and emancipation.
1881	James A. Garfield	20th President	Charles J. Guiteau	Upset over political patronage (“spoils system”).
1901	William McKinley	25th President	Leon Czolgosz	Anarchist, anti-government ideology.
1921	Father James Coyle	Catholic priest in Alabama	Edwin Stephenson (KKK member)	Murdered for performing an interracial marriage.
1935	Huey P. Long	U.S. Senator, Louisiana	Carl Weiss	Political opponent; motives mixed but political rivalry central.
1963	John F. Kennedy	35th President	Lee Harvey Oswald (officially)	Motive debated; Cold War, leftist sympathies.
1963	Medgar Evers	Civil Rights activist, NAACP leader	Byron De La Beckwith (White supremacist)	Targeted for civil rights activism.
1965	Malcolm X	Black nationalist leader	Members of Nation of Islam	Internal ideological and political conflict.
1968	Martin Luther King Jr.	Civil Rights leader	James Earl Ray	Racist opposition to civil rights movement.
1968	Robert F. Kennedy	U.S. Senator, Presidential candidate	Sirhan Sirhan	Anger at Kennedy’s pro-Israel stance.
1978	Harvey Milk	San Francisco Supervisor, gay rights activist	Dan White	Political/ideological rivalry and resentment.
1993	Dr. David Gunn	Abortion provider	Michael Griffin	Anti-abortion extremist ideology.
2009	George Tiller	Abortion provider	Scott Roeder	Anti-abortion extremist ideology.
2015	Clementa C. Pinckney	South Carolina state senator & pastor	Dylann Roof	White supremacist, mass shooting at church.

Key Takeaways

• Presidents assassinated: 4 (Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, Kennedy).
• Civil Rights leaders: Several, including MLK, Medgar Evers, Malcolm X.
• Other politicians: Huey Long, Robert Kennedy, Harvey Milk, Clementa Pinckney.
• Ideological murders (e.g., abortion doctors, hate crimes): Common in late 20th/21st century.

Do you want me to also make a separate section with “ordinary citizens” killed for political reasons (e.g., Charlottesville car attack 2017, extremist shootings, etc.), so you get the bigger picture beyond famous figures?”

 

[King_Kamala61]

You see a lot of this

Even here with ppl defending @the cac mamba

You think that white man hates the more minorities but likes Black people?

They mastered us in ways we can never fathom and it's to the point we run white supremacist tactics on ourselves willingly with a smile.

 

[Ish Gibor]

Do you want me to also make a separate section with “ordinary citizens” killed for political reasons (e.g., Charlottesville car attack 2017, extremist shootings, etc.), so you get the bigger picture beyond famous figures?”

Prompt Yes:

That’s a really good and complex question. To answer it clearly, we should break it down:

1. Definition of Assassination

• Assassination usually means the targeted killing of a public or political figure because of their position or views.
• If we expand it to ordinary Americans killed because of their political views, that overlaps with politically motivated murders, hate crimes, or terrorism.

2. High-Profile Political Assassinations in U.S. History

These are well-documented cases where national figures were killed because of politics:

• Abraham Lincoln (1865) – assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer.
• James A. Garfield (1881) – killed by Charles Guiteau, who was angry over political patronage.
• William McKinley (1901) – assassinated by anarchist Leon Czolgosz.
• John F. Kennedy (1963) – killed by Lee Harvey Oswald (motives still debated, but political context central).
• Martin Luther King Jr. (1968) – assassinated for his civil rights activism.
• Robert F. Kennedy (1968) – assassinated during his presidential campaign.

3. Other Politically Motivated Killings

• Numerous civil rights activists (e.g., Medgar Evers, 1963).
• Local politicians, union leaders, journalists, and activists have also been murdered for their political stances across U.S. history.

4. Ordinary Americans Killed Over Political Views

This is harder to count, because:

• Many murders linked to politics are categorized as domestic terrorism, hate crimes, or extremist violence.
• Research by organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) tracks politically motivated killings:
  • Between 2010 and 2022, hundreds of murders in the U.S. were tied to extremist ideology (far-right, far-left, religious, etc.).
  • Most of these victims were targeted because of their perceived political or social group identity.

5. Numbers

• High-profile assassinations of major American leaders: around a dozen clearly political since the Civil War.
• Ordinary Americans killed due to political/ideological motives:
  • According to ADL data, 2010–2022 saw over 400 extremist-related killings in the U.S.
  • Not all were strictly “assassinations,” but many were because of political or social beliefs.

Summary:

• About 4 U.S. Presidents and several major leaders (MLK, RFK, etc.) were assassinated because of political views.
• Hundreds of ordinary Americans in recent decades have been murdered in politically motivated violence, but the exact number depends on how broadly you define “assassination.”

Would you like me to make you a timeline table of major American assassinations (Presidents, activists, politicians) with their killers and motives?

Prompt, Yes:

Perfect — let’s expand the picture. Here’s a list of ordinary Americans killed because of political, ideological, or extremist motives, outside of famous assassinations:

Politically Motivated Murders of Ordinary Citizens

Year	Victim(s)	Location	Perpetrator / Group	Motive / Political Context
1964	James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner	Mississippi	Ku Klux Klan	Civil rights workers murdered during Freedom Summer.
1979	5 anti-Klan demonstrators	Greensboro, NC	KKK & American Nazi Party members	Killed during protest against racism.
1981	Michael Donald	Alabama	KKK members	Lynched for racial terror, politically symbolic killing.
1995	168 victims (Oklahoma City bombing)	Oklahoma City, OK	Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols	Anti-government militia ideology.
1999	9 victims (Jewish Community Center shooting & postal murder)	LA area	Buford Furrow (white supremacist)	Racist/antisemitic ideology.
2012	6 Sikh worshippers	Oak Creek, WI	Wade Michael Page (neo-Nazi)	White supremacist targeting religious minority.
2015	9 Black parishioners at Emanuel AME Church	Charleston, SC	Dylann Roof	White supremacist terrorism.
2017	Heather Heyer	Charlottesville, VA	James Alex Fields Jr.	Neo-Nazi plowed car into anti-racist protest.
2018	11 worshippers (Tree of Life Synagogue)	Pittsburgh, PA	Robert Bowers	Antisemitic extremist attack.
2019	23 victims (Walmart shooting)	El Paso, TX	Patrick Crusius	White nationalist, anti-immigrant motive.
2020	Aaron Danielson	Portland, OR	Michael Reinoehl (self-identified antifa supporter)	Killed during street clashes with right-wing groups.
2022	10 Black victims (Buffalo supermarket shooting)	Buffalo, NY	Payton Gendron	White supremacist targeting Black community.

Patterns

• Civil Rights Era (1960s): Killings by white supremacists and the Klan targeting activists and allies.
• 1970s–1990s: Spike in extremist militia, Klan, and anti-government violence.
• 2000s–2020s: Rise of lone-wolf extremist attacks (far-right, white supremacist, anti-abortion, and some far-left retaliatory violence).

Summary so far:

• Well-known political assassinations (Presidents, activists, politicians): ~15+ major cases.
• Ordinary citizens murdered for political/ideological reasons: Hundreds of documented cases, especially when including hate crimes and extremist violence.
• Largest single event: Oklahoma City bombing (1995, 168 killed).

End Prompt.

 

[Marc Spector]

He’s a gay, Mormon, from Utah. This is exactly what he should sound like.

thats where i am at with it. Utah is a weird place and even their brain rotted, Trans loving, genz shytpost killers probably have that veneer of politeness and white bread sensibilities that the rest of the Cac populace of Utah has.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Republicans: “We need our second amendment rights to protect all our other rights”

Also Republicans: “We are working on removing rights from everybody but rich old white men”

Crazy person:”to protect my rights”

Republicans: “ not like that”

 

[Sir Richard Spirit]

thats where i am at with it. Utah is a weird place and even their brain rotted, Trans loving, genz shytpost killers probably have that veneer of politeness and white bread sensibilities that the rest of the Cac populace of Utah has.

Or he just spoke well

 

[Afrodroid]

What the hell does it matter if he's gay or not?

In the end, it's a right wing cac killing another right wing cac, but these racist scum want to blame minorities for it

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I don't know any gay cacs, but I highly doubt they call each other " my love".

Also who the fukk says "my vehicle"?


We believing this shyt FBI now?

It’s ironic humor, a playful term of endearment. It’s unserious. It’s like a meme. We don’t even know if they were actually in a relationship, or if they were just friends. It’s hard to distinguish exactly what is because of that specific online/meme culture, that unless you’re a part of, you don’t know what’s serious and what isn’t.

To a similar degree, it’s like all the in-jokes we use on this board. It’s a certain behavior that would seem strange to anyone looking from the outside in.

Can you just imagine if someone on this board committed a crime on this scale and messages were leaked of them talking to @KnickstapeCity saying they’ve got a big dikk?

He’s a gay, Mormon, from Utah. This is exactly what he should sound like.

I don’t know about all that, but regardless of that, this is what he sounds like for whatever reason it may be. Posters on here have seemingly made up their minds he’s supposed to sound a certain way because he’s a Gen Z kid and since it doesn’t match up with their preconceived notion of him they’re calling the exchange fake.

 

[boogers]

lol i wish i could find the gif of craig 'mums' grant on Oz smiling saying "hes still dead" while peeling potatoes

might have to clip that one myself. yarn is fukking up!

 

[bnew]

If it leads to another Civil War, a lot of them right wingers with guns are simply not prepared for the fallout (mentally).

The violence happened in a RED state. Not Chicago. Not DC. Not even the N.O.

they scattered because of a single gun-shot.

 

[voltronblack]

Maaaan I'm concerned for our people. They don't know what racism look like unlike its stereotypical racism.

Unless they see and hear racists say the n-word, they are not going to believe they are racist. That's how a lot of anti-Black people fly under the radar.

Exclusive: Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy

The forty-two-minute recording, acquired by James Carter IV, confirms Atwater’s incendiary remarks and places them in context.

www.thenation.com

You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nword, nword, nword.” By 1968 you can’t say “nword”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nword, nword.”

Now, the same indefatigable researcher who brought us Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” remarks, James Carter IV, has dug up the entire forty-two-minute interview from which that quote derives. Here, The Nation publishes it in its entirety for the very first time.

Listen to the full forty-two-minute conversation with Atwater:


The back-story goes like this. In 1981, Atwater, after a decade as South Carolina’s most effective Republican operative, was working in Ronald Reagan’s White House when he was interviewed by Alexander Lamis, a political scientist at Case Western Reserve University. Lamis published the interview without using Atwater’s name in his 1984 book The Two-Party South. Fifteen years later—and eight years after Atwater passed away from cancer—Lamis republished the interview in another book using Atwater’s name. For seven years no one paid much attention. Then the New York Times‘ Bob Herbert, a bit of an Atwater obsessive, quoted it in an October 6, 2005 column—then five more times over the next four years.

Those words soon became legend—quoted in both screeds (The GOP-Haters Handbook, 2007) and scholarship (Corey Robin’s 2011 classic work of political theory, The Reactionary Mind). Google Books records its use in ten books published so far this year alone. Curious about the remarks’ context, Carter, who learned Lamis had died in 2012, asked his widow if she would consider releasing the audio of the interview, especially in light of the use of race-baiting dog-whistles (lies about Obama ending work requirements for welfare; “jokes” about his supposed Kenyan provenance) in the Romney presidential campaign. Renée Lamis, an Obama donor, agreed that very same night. For one thing she was “upset,” Carter told me, that “for some time, conservatives believed [her] husband made up the Atwater interview.” For another, she was eager to illustrate that her husband’s use of the Atwater quote was scholarly, not political.

So what does the new contextual wrapping teach us? It vindicates Lamis, who indeed comes off as careful and scholarly. And no surprise, it shows Atwater acting yet again in bad faith.

In the lead-up to the infamous remarks, it is fascinating to witness the confidence with which Atwater believes himself to be establishing the racial innocence of latter-day Republican campaigning: “My generation,” he insists, “will be the first generation of Southerners that won’t be prejudiced.” He proceeds to develop the argument that by dropping talk about civil rights gains like the Voting Rights Act and sticking to the now-mainstream tropes of fiscal conservatism and national defense, consultants like him were proving “people in the South are just like any people in the history of the world.”

It is only upon Professor Lamis’s gently Socratic follow-ups, and those of a co-interviewer named “Saul” (Carter hasn’t been able to confirm his identity, but suspects it was the late White House correspondent Saul Friedman), that Atwater begins to loosen up—prefacing his reflections, with a plainly guilty conscience, “Now, y’all aren’t quoting me on this?” (Apparently , this is the reason why Atwater’s name wasn’t published in 1984 but was in 1999, after his death).

He then utters his infamous words. The interlocutors go on to kibitz about Huey Long and barbecue. Then Atwater, apparently satisfied that he’d absolved the Southern Republican Party of racism once and for all, follows up with a prediction based on a study he claims demonstrates that Strom Thurmond won 38 percent of South Carolina’s middle-class black vote in his 1978 Senate campaign (run by Atwater).

“That voter, in my judgment,” he claims, “will be more likely to vote his economic interests than he will anything else. And that is the voter that I think through a fairly slow but very steady process, will go Republican.” Because race no longer matters: “In my judgment Karl Marx [is right]… the real issues ultimately will be the economic issues.” He continues, in words that uncannily echo the “47 percent tape” (nothing new under the wingnut sun), that “statistically, as the number of non-producers in the system moves toward fifty percent,” the conservative coalition cannot but expand. Voila: a new Republican majority. Racism won’t have anything to do with it.

Not bloody likely. In 2005, the political scientists Nicholas Valentino and David Sears demonstrated that a Southern man holding conservative positions on issues other than race is no more likely than a conservative Northerner to vote for a Democrat. But when the relevant identifier is anti-black answers to survey questions—like whether one agrees “If blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites”—white Southerners were twice as likely than white Northerners to refuse to vote Democratic. As another political scientist, Thomas Schaller, wrote in his 2006 book Whistling Past Dixie (which naturally quotes the infamous Atwater lines), “Despite the best efforts of Republican spinmeisters…the partisan impact of racial attitudes in the South is stronger today than in the past.”

Which one particular Republican spinmeister, when he wasn’t preening before political scientists, knew fully well—which was why, seven years after that interview, in his stated goal to “rip the bark off the little b*stard [Michael Dukakis]” on behalf of his candidate George H.W. Bush, Atwater ran the infamous ad blaming Dukakis for an escaped Massachusetts convict, Willie Horton, “repeatedly raping” an apparently white girl. Indeed, Atwater pledged to make “Willie Horton his running mate.” The commercial was sponsored by a dummy outfit called the National Security Political Action Committee—which it is true, was a whole lot more abstract than saying “nword, nword, nword.”

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

This country is fukked lmao

 

[Robbie3000]

Did the FbI take over @Gil Scott-Heroin account?

Mans been working overtime since last night to prove the authenticity of these texts.

Not saying that they are definitely fake, but Breh has put in alot of work.

 

[Tair]

Kash Patel is fukking idoit is trying to save his job. This was most likely a recreation of what the FBI believes the message originally was. Hence the boomer prose and lack of brainrot language. Compare this message to the leak disord messages of Tyler and his peers.

Dude looks like he had a drug problem back in the day.