BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot dead by a sniper at event in Utah. Suspect caught, right wing weirdo

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,741
Reputation
12,590
Daps
227,481
Nah. Malcolm X's legend has grown over the last 60 years, even among White people. Kirk's punk ass on the other hand will be forgotten and replaced by another fool next week. Do you think anyone is going to remember that fool Kirk 6 years from now, much less 60 years from now?

Who actually remembers Rush Limbaugh, or had a recent rally with his words? :pachaha:

Conservatives erase themselves with hate and quickly are forgotten after they croak.
 

Stir Fry

Eastside Eggroll
Supporter
Joined
Mar 1, 2015
Messages
32,665
Reputation
31,689
Daps
142,491
Reppin
Dapcity.com
They just released a picture of the dude's trans roommate/boyfriend



268530







Oh wait, that JD Vance :mjlol:
























 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,699
Reputation
860
Daps
7,188
They’re formal too. That’s just how he wrote. The message he sent to his friends revealing himself as the shooter is formal too.
I have not researched it, but I assume you have?

Where are these other examples of his social media posts?
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,699
Reputation
860
Daps
7,188
Nobody is buying it, yet still nobody can explain what the benefit of them fabricating that exchange is...

:hubie:

If it is in indeed a made-up conversation, then it's more likely Tyler made it up himself than law enforcement. That's what makes more logical and practical sense. He planted that exchange to hide his true intent and it's much easier for him to plant that exchange than it is for an entire operation to curate one and implicate one another.
Why? Because the entire thing looks like a setup. Too manny questionable things happened.

How did the get the long weapon in, and out. How did it appear in the woods.

Why did he switch changing clothes several times.

A lot of things don’t make sense and these are just some of the markers people wonder about.

The Valhalla thing is still comical, especially how it’s being a thing in far right circles.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,699
Reputation
860
Daps
7,188
Are they suggesting the Discord members are Antifa based on the phrases and communications he had? It’s known that the Alt Right / Groypers use this kind of language.

“The phrase inscribed on one of the bullet casings from the shooting — “Hey fascist, catch!” — though widely reported to mean he was a man of the left, is in fact a reference to the Helldivers 2 game. Three arrows initially believed by federal agents to be a reference to Antifa are also a reference to Helldivers.”

ChatGPT, prompt “What does Valhalla mean to the far right”:

In far-right spaces, Valhalla—taken from Norse mythology—has been re-framed as a symbol of militant honor, white identity, and violent struggle. Its original meaning in Old Norse sources is the “hall of the slain,” where warriors chosen by Odin go after dying bravely in battle. But the far right strips that mythological context and repurposes it as an ideological emblem. A few key ways this happens:
  • Martyrdom & Heroic Death: Some far-right extremists use “Valhalla” to glorify violence or terrorism, suggesting that those who die in violent acts for their cause will be rewarded as warriors in an eternal afterlife. For instance, “See you in Valhalla” has been used in manifestos and on extremist forums as a farewell or honorific for attackers.
  • White Identity Symbolism: Valhalla has been adopted within neo-Nazi and “Odinist” circles as part of a broader use of Norse and Viking imagery to construct a sense of “authentic” European/white heritage. This provides an alternative to Christianity, which many far-right subcultures reject as “weak” or “foreign.”
  • Militarized Brotherhood: Invoking Valhalla helps create a sense of warrior fraternity and timeless struggle. It is used in slogans, tattoos, and group names to reinforce the idea of being part of a warrior caste fighting for survival of their “people.”
  • Terrorist Propaganda: Several far-right terrorists (e.g., Anders Breivik, Brenton Tarrant) referenced Norse mythology, warrior codes, and Valhalla in writings and imagery, framing their actions as part of a mythic battle.
So, in short: to the far right, Valhalla is less about myth and more about glorifying violent sacrifice, racial identity, and warrior masculinity—a mythologized afterlife used to justify present-day extremism.

👉
Do you want me to also show examples of where “Valhalla” has been explicitly used in far-right propaganda, tattoos, or manifestos, so you can see how the symbol travels from mythology into extremist subculture?”

Prompt yes:

Here are several concrete examples of how “Valhalla” has shown up in far-right or extremist texts, propaganda, and rhetoric—illustrating how the symbol is used, adapted, and deployed to further ideological goals:

Examples

  1. Christchurch Mosque Attack Manifesto (New Zealand, 2019)
    The perpetrator ended his manifesto with the phrase “See you in Valhalla.” This is a common trope in extremist manifestos: it ties death (especially violent death) to mythic honor and frames the attacker’s cause as part of something eternal.
  2. Manifesto by Gendron
    “God bless you all and I hope to see you in Valhalla.” This is from a far-right attacker’s manifesto (referring to the Buffalo, NY attack in 2022). The usage again connects religious or spiritual rhetoric with the myth of Valhalla, suggesting a warrior’s afterlife for those aligned with the attacker’s views.
  3. “Why far-right extremists co-opt Norse symbolism” / academic analyses
    Multiple analyses of far-right and extremist rhetoric have noted that Valhalla is used as part of the mythic or religious structure in manifestos, podcasts, and online communities, often in tandem with references to Norse gods, runes, Viking imagery, etc., to construct heroic, apocalyptic narratives.
  4. Use in video games / popular culture as propaganda
    In the study God of Race War: The Utilisation of Viking-Themed Video Games in Far-Right Propaganda, the name Valhalla (and related Norse motifs) was explicitly used by white supremacists to evoke a romanticized, all-white warrior past, reinforcing ideas of racial identity and purity. The game’s title “Valhalla” is not just decorative, it is part of a larger narrative infrastructure to promote a mythologized European heritage.
  5. More recent public usages / memes
    As reported, when FBI Director Kash Patel recently ended a tribute speech with “We have the watch, and I’ll see you in Valhalla,” that phrase was hijacked on far right forums and channels. Even if the speaker wasn’t intending extremist symbolism, the phrase “See you in Valhalla” carries loaded meaning in these communities, so people used it as a meme or signifier.
If you like, I can pull up original text excerpts (from manifestos, speeches, etc.) to show exactly how Valhalla is framed (what comes before / after, what other symbolism it’s paired with). Would you prefer those?

End Prompt.
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,699
Reputation
860
Daps
7,188
Some people were really trying to say this stuff was going to disappear by next week:mjlol:
Not by far, the more intel has come out (being released) the more questions people have. And now it’s by both sides of the political spectrum.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,418
Reputation
10,211
Daps
240,990
Why? Because the entire thing looks like a setup. Too manny questionable things happened.

How did the fit the long weapon in, and out. How did it appear in the woods.

Why did he switch changing clothes several times.

A lot of things don’t make sense and these are just some of the markers people wonder about.

The Valhalla thing is still comical, especially how it’s being a thing in far right circles.
I don't disagree that there are many things that don't seem right. The Tyler/roommate exchange, in isolation, doesn't read right. It's hard to trust what is real and what isn't, you'll get no arguments from me on that front.

The only way we can somewhat piece this together to make some sense is to track who did what and why they did it.

If you're not buying what the FBI released, then the next question is, what is it exactly don't you buy and how does them fabricating it aid in their purpose?

This is the court filing of the charges in their entirety - Read the Charges Against Tyler Robinson

This is the full transcript of the exchange between Tyler and the roommate -
11111.png

22222.png

333333.png

444444.png
After reading that, what purpose would law enforcement have in creating this exchange? Tyler doesn't reveal his political motivation and there's no uncovering of any details that implicate or protect anyone else potentially involved. What benefit is there for them to make up a rather inconsequential interaction?

If they were going to make something up, it would be of political nature, something they can use for political gain. There's nothing in that convo they can use to that benefit. That's why despite however suspect the language Tyler uses and the details he reveals, it's more probable that it's a legitimate dialogue that took place between the two because there's no propaganda injected into it.

There's nothing in that exchange about how he was allegedly radicalized by leftist ideology that the Trump administration/cult were trying to speak into existence.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
5,699
Reputation
860
Daps
7,188
I thought republicans were pro free speech :troll:
ChatGPT prompt History of the Gestapo, free speech;

“The Gestapo and free speech were fundamentally incompatible. From its founding in 1933, the Gestapo’s primary function was to suppress any form of political dissent or criticism of the Nazi regime.

Here’s how it related to free expression:
  • No legal protection: In Weimar Germany, before Hitler, free speech was constitutionally guaranteed. Under the Nazis, these rights were stripped almost immediately. The Gestapo could arrest anyone for statements considered hostile to the state—whether spoken, written, or even rumored.
  • Censorship and surveillance: Newspapers, books, films, theater, and radio were tightly controlled. Writers, journalists, and artists who spoke out risked arrest or exile. The Gestapo worked alongside Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda to enforce conformity.
  • Denunciations: Ordinary citizens often reported neighbors or coworkers for “defeatist talk,” jokes about Hitler, or critical comments. The Gestapo relied heavily on this system, which created a culture of fear and self-censorship.
  • Criminalizing dissent: Even small acts—listening to foreign radio, telling anti-Nazi jokes, distributing banned leaflets—could lead to imprisonment or being sent to a concentration camp.
  • Total control of speech: The only “freedom” of speech permitted was loyal praise of Hitler and the Nazi state. Any alternative opinion was treated as subversive.
⚖️ After 1945, the Gestapo became a key historical example of what happens when a state eliminates free speech protections: surveillance, fear, and repression replace open discussion and criticism.”

End prompt.
 
Top