I take this loaded question as an admission that, for you, this issue isn't about what's best for Europe- but comeuppance.
As for the white people who are anti immigration, among them you will find interventionists and non-interventionists.
To whatever extent it matters, I'm a non-interventionist. STOP DESTABILIZING. Still, my position is, regardless of any European destabilization, European governments should do what's best for their countries. And mass immigration from the third world is not best for Europe. I oppose mass immigration in America and I oppose it there.
What's the alternative? Governments should do what's best for other country's people?
I actually dont disagree with this stance.
The problem is the lack of consistency from its most ardent supporters.
And its beyond just the geopolitical interventionism.
Its the cultural interventionism and the attempt to project superiority on third world people (forcing democracy, western liberal ideas, shoving western cultural concepts in the face of people who desire to live differently)
the desire to satisfy racial ego is high key fukking europe and to a lesser extent America.
France is a great example, they want to maintain control of certain western african nations by shoving francophonism down their throats.
How about leaving those people completely alone? Let them carve out their own cultural norms free of western interference.