what makes you say he does not have his story straight?Why can't Greenwald get his story straight on who had access to the documents?
what makes you say he does not have his story straight?Why can't Greenwald get his story straight on who had access to the documents?
Who said anything about believe me.I don't need to answer you
I simply don't believe you
and I have years of education behind my skepticism
I don't find your questions particularly challenging, I just don't like entertaining people who I find disingenuous
that's how I see your questionsAnd why are greenwalds questions so elementary in their framing?

I don't know how to word this shyt anymore. I'm just convinced people think there is nothing wrong in the world and they think that just because theres no one currently invading that no threats exist or that geopolitical standing isn't important to them.this thread is terrible and it's not even Napolean's fault this time.![]()
no oneWho said anything about believe me.

What type of journalist claims to respond to claims about the impact of his repotting with "well what about their sources"that's how I see your questions![]()
Claiming to be in possession of some superior knowledge or understanding of the case isn't helping you either. You're just trolling at this point.playing dumb does not help you with me![]()
I don't know how to word this shyt anymore. I'm just convinced people think there is nothing wrong in the world and they think that just because theres no one currently invading that no threats exist or that geopolitical standing isn't important to them.
They're lazy...and its precisely a result of the continuous efforts of successful domination by the USA all this time to allow them to take all this shyt for granted.
Bottom line: Snowden burned the USA internationally. Period.
Bottom line: Snowden burned the USA internationally. Period.

#factsThe posters in here say they either "don't give a fukk" yet have several posts in this thread or are responding with non-answers.

no my dearClaiming to be in possession of some superior knowledge or understanding of the case isn't helping you either
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/...iles-journalism-worst-also-filled-falsehoods/The Sunday Times’ Snowden Story is Journalism at its Worst — and Filled with Falsehoods
no my dear
what I am claiming is you don't know shyt
I have decades of neocon behavior and educated political principles that dictate what I believe neocons will or will not do
this notion that I am to blindly believe that the document leaks were harmful to my interests seems way too convenient for the interests of the neocons.
This has nothing to do with neoconsever heard of propaganda?
what I look at is what the neocons have done, past behavior dictates future behavior
repeated past behavior dictates principles of behavior
this shyt ain't that complicated
have they repeatedly spied on me without my knowledge?
Irrelevanthave they repeatedly ignored my interests in favor of that of the corporation?
Irrelevanthave they repeatedly lied before about taking away my civil rights under the guise of stopping terrorism?
IrrelevantHave they repeatedly used the media before as a branch of their propaganda?
IrrelevantHave they repeatedly lied before to invade other countries?
Yes.Have they repeatedly lied before to steal resources from other countries?
None of this has anything to do with liberal or conservative. Both sides of the aisle have negative views of what Snowden is doing to the intelligence establishment with respect to international affairs.So when you just run up in here and tell me that the neocons are here to look out for me on this matter
Because you keep posting irrelevant issues not pertinent to international relations and national interests.you have a whole heap of shyt to climb before you get me to swallow this nonsense whole
Acknowledging past lies does nothing to improve your prediction of further lies. It only makes you skeptical...it doesn't make you right.I mean someone told you that somebody leaked Snowden's papers
so what? You want me to assume this is true? you want me to assume this is true and causative of the sequelae of claims you attach to it?
Sorry bud, you need more people
Yet because Greenwald said it...that makes it right?



no because you said it or your sources said it makes it rightYet because Greenwald said it...that makes it right?
