BREAKING: RUSSIANS & CHINESE HACK SNOWDEN FILES--British spies 'moved after Snowden files read'

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,516
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,948
Reppin
The Deep State
I don't need to answer you
I simply don't believe you
and I have years of education behind my skepticism
I don't find your questions particularly challenging, I just don't like entertaining people who I find disingenuous
Who said anything about believe me.

I'm saying that Greenwald's story is falling apart and everyone who has experience in this field is calling him out on it. Only in the AnCap, super-skeptical of everything by the state community does Greenwald seem to be this untouchable figure...when instead he's someone who has shown himself to lie when necessary and skew narratives by obfuscating serious questions with layered questions of his own to remove the guilt and subterfuge he participates in.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,516
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,948
Reppin
The Deep State
this thread is terrible and it's not even Napolean's fault this time. :heh:
I don't know how to word this shyt anymore. I'm just convinced people think there is nothing wrong in the world and they think that just because theres no one currently invading that no threats exist or that geopolitical standing isn't important to them.

They're lazy...and its precisely a result of the continuous efforts of successful domination by the USA all this time to allow them to take all this shyt for granted. :snoop:

Bottom line: Snowden burned the USA internationally. Period.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,516
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,948
Reppin
The Deep State
that's how I see your questions:mjlol:
What type of journalist claims to respond to claims about the impact of his repotting with "well what about their sources"

Man come on. Don't hit me with that "Oh well its Operation Mockingbird" bullshyt.

This man participate in the largest leak of classified information EVER and we're supposed to act like NO ONE was at risk inbetween?

The fact that you can't acknowledge that is very troubling.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
I don't know how to word this shyt anymore. I'm just convinced people think there is nothing wrong in the world and they think that just because theres no one currently invading that no threats exist or that geopolitical standing isn't important to them.

They're lazy...and its precisely a result of the continuous efforts of successful domination by the USA all this time to allow them to take all this shyt for granted. :snoop:

Bottom line: Snowden burned the USA internationally. Period.

The posters in here say they either "don't give a fukk" yet have several posts in this thread or are responding with non-answers.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,792
Claiming to be in possession of some superior knowledge or understanding of the case isn't helping you either
no my dear
what I am claiming is you don't know shyt
I have decades of neocon behavior and educated political principles that dictate what I believe neocons will or will not do
this notion that I am to blindly believe that the document leaks were harmful to my interests seems way too convenient for the interests of the neocons.

ever heard of propaganda?

what I look at is what the neocons have done, past behavior dictates future behavior
repeated past behavior dictates principles of behavior
this shyt ain't that complicated

have they repeatedly spied on me without my knowledge?
have they repeatedly ignored my interests in favor of that of the corporation?
have they repeatedly lied before about taking away my civil rights under the guise of stopping terrorism?
Have they repeatedly used the media before as a branch of their propaganda?
Have they repeatedly lied before to invade other countries?
Have they repeatedly lied before to steal resources from other countries?

So when you just run up in here and tell me that the neocons are here to look out for me on this matter
you have a whole heap of shyt to climb before you get me to swallow this nonsense whole

I mean someone told you that somebody leaked Snowden's papers
so what? You want me to assume this is true? you want me to assume this is true and causative of the sequelae of claims you attach to it?
Sorry bud, you need more people
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,516
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,948
Reppin
The Deep State
no my dear
what I am claiming is you don't know shyt
I have decades of neocon behavior and educated political principles that dictate what I believe neocons will or will not do
this notion that I am to blindly believe that the document leaks were harmful to my interests seems way too convenient for the interests of the neocons.

This has nothing to do with neocons.
ever heard of propaganda?

what I look at is what the neocons have done, past behavior dictates future behavior
repeated past behavior dictates principles of behavior
this shyt ain't that complicated
This has nothing to do with neocons

have they repeatedly spied on me without my knowledge?

Domestic wiretapping isn't what I'm discussing.
have they repeatedly ignored my interests in favor of that of the corporation?
Irrelevant
have they repeatedly lied before about taking away my civil rights under the guise of stopping terrorism?
Irrelevant
Have they repeatedly used the media before as a branch of their propaganda?
Irrelevant
Have they repeatedly lied before to invade other countries?
Irrelevant
Have they repeatedly lied before to steal resources from other countries?
Yes.
So when you just run up in here and tell me that the neocons are here to look out for me on this matter
None of this has anything to do with liberal or conservative. Both sides of the aisle have negative views of what Snowden is doing to the intelligence establishment with respect to international affairs.
you have a whole heap of shyt to climb before you get me to swallow this nonsense whole
Because you keep posting irrelevant issues not pertinent to international relations and national interests.

I mean someone told you that somebody leaked Snowden's papers
so what? You want me to assume this is true? you want me to assume this is true and causative of the sequelae of claims you attach to it?
Sorry bud, you need more people
Acknowledging past lies does nothing to improve your prediction of further lies. It only makes you skeptical...it doesn't make you right.

None of those things you mentioned have anything to do with whether or not Snowden's carelessness allowed these documents to fall into enemy hands.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,516
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,948
Reppin
The Deep State
Yet because Greenwald said it...that makes it right?

See what you're working with here? :heh:

This is the guy who literally can't wait to try and defend himself. Of course he'd deny it.

He didn't even know how to use PGP before Snowden ...but now he's an expert on what other state governments can and can't do with their own efforts to get access to that data? :pachaha:


All Greenwald said:

1. Theres anonymous sources

2. They can't prove anyone is in danger.

REALLY motherfukker...REALLY?! :snoop:
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,792
The Sunday Times’ Snowden Story is Journalism at its Worst — and Filled with Falsehoods
Yet because Greenwald said it...that makes it right?
no because you said it or your sources said it makes it right :heh:
 
Top