It’s not about a woman’s happiness being tied to a man’s accomplishments.I know this is your experience, and I'm not invalidating it, but this is the woman's role period.
Just as I told him the rule is only for him, your scenario and belief is only for you. I know women personally that just loved the guy. A friend left his fiance were having non-financial issues at one point and she was begging for him back, she told me from her mouth that she just wanted him back, she makes alot of money, much more than him, and he could work his job for the next 20 years she didn't care she just wanted him back.
I know a couple where the woman is an actual surgeon who makes way more money than her husband, and he is accomplished in the military, and retired early but does not make nearly as much as her. They could be pretending, but they seem very happy and have been together a very long time, and travel together alot when they're both free.
If her happiness is based on his financials(or even her own) then she has a problem. As long as your expenses are covered, and you are all healthy there should be no issue. If you're blessed with more, then great. If you have a man that has done his absolute best(we can tell in our relationships when somebody is pulling their weight and trying their best) and your happiness is based on his accomplishments, then you dont need to be with anyone because you will never be happy, as happiness is internal.
It’s about not acknowledging how much more tired and worn down a woman’s body will become if she’s doing double duty FOR DECADES.
Yes, it’s a woman’s role —period.
If that’s the case, being a provider is a man’s role —period.
If a woman is bearing children, going back to work FT, cleaning the house and doing all the cooking on top of that……..

If I get home from work everyday at 630 you’re going to wait for me to make dinner when you’re home by 4 or home all day? Every day?? You home all day but won’t wash dishes or run the vacuum because that’s my role, even though I’m contributing to YOUR role?
That’s what I’m talking about. I think that’s wild.
And if your guy is older and retired from his career so he’s home, that isn’t the same as a man who can’t contribute financially. That retirement money is still actually going into the household/lifestyle/is available in the advent the wife falls ill and can’t work.