Kobe had the benefit of ****ing Shaq and was the 2nd option in two of those, had the benefit of a miracle shot by Fisher in one of those, had one of those most blatant missed foul calls EVER to save them (Fisher on Barry) but they still deserved to win.
It wasn't hero ball though. It was a bunch of clutch team plays plus Kobe's scoring. Again, Kobe can only affect the game wifey scoring whereas Lebron was able to affect the game a myriad of ways (Passing, shutting down Danny Green after him and Wade switched, picks, etc). We saw how hard the Heat shooters struggle when a defense decided to let Lebron go one on one like PG did with Lebron and you morons are honestly bit understanding exactly why the Heat shooters are finally going off while Lebron is taking less shots and not focusing on being the primary scorer.
You're harping on Lebron for realizing his shot was off and trying to find another way to help his team win. This as stupid as harping on Kobe for going 6-24 but pulling down key rebounds they needed for their win.
First off all, I didnt "harp" on anything
I gave you a reason why Lakers fan may look at LeBron's passive aggressive performance in these NBA Finals (because of our past dealings with the Spurs in the playoffs) and then you randomly bring up Shaq like that takes away from Kobe dominating them?
1999 playoff series against the Spurs: 21.3 ppg on 44.7% FG
2001 playoff series against the Spurs: 31.3 ppg on 51.4% FG
2002 playoff series against the Spurs: 26.2 ppg on 45.5% FG
2003 playoff series against the Spurs: 32.3 ppg on 43.4% FG
2004 playoff series against the Spurs: 26.3 ppg on 46.2% FG
2008 playoff series against the Spurs: 29.2 ppg on 53.3% FG
Career 28.2 ppg (scored 847 total points in 30 career playoff games) on 47.4% FG
Compare that to LeBron's career 20.5 ppg on 37.4% FG averages in NBA Finals appearances against the Spurs (6 total games and 123 points on 46-123 shooting) and we have a valid basis for our argument.