Hurts is top 10 by default. He's a champion, he wins way more than he loses, and he makes winning plays more often than not. However, he isn't as statistically productive as many of his peers, particularly when it comes to throwing the ball, and he lacks the arm talent of some of his peers. Anyone who watches the game can see that.
Multiple things can be true: He generally plays his best when it matters and should be more consistently productive statistically, given his supporting cast. Oh well. It depends on what you want from your QB, and he does what's asked. I think there are a few QBs who could replicate what Hurts does in the Philadelphia offense, and that the Eagles can win without him. But it won't look quite the same.
All that said, the first order of business is that people must accept that the QB's job, above all else, is to manage the game and do what is required to win. At the very least, the QB has to avoid causing a loss. Being a game manager is not a bad thing, and there are way more of them than there are "elite QBs" or "gamechangers."