Can anybody please explain why you never hear people say" what abt White on white crime"

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

Tell us why poverty and institutional racism make Black men kill one another.

Those can be contributing factors though, let's not brush that completely off. BUT at the end of the day, a lot of this shyt isn't about poverty, it's about bullshyt. Don't get me wrong their are legit enclaves of places where poverty is high. But to act like cats is out here living in the favela's of Brazil is just, nah...

 

[Biscayne]

The problem is not the "black on black" because yes most crimes are usually committed against someone of the same race. The problem is the RATE of black on black crime. For every 1000 white people, 2.6 will be murdered. For every 1000 black people, 18.3 will be murdered. So you're talking almost 9 times the rate.

And the rate of Blacks killing Whites is minuscule also. Yet when a Black person kills a White person, or if a Black person kills an officer, Whites don't proclaim "What about White on White crime?" or "White gun owner on Officer crime". The narrative is always focused on the Black perps and Whites never waver from that narrative.

Hell, we can take it even further and discuss religious attacks in this country, such as those influenced by Islam. More White Non-Muslims in this nation are killed by other White Non-Muslims in this country(via domestic violence, mass shootings or what have you) but when there's any sort of Islamic-related attack, no one attempts to change the narrative and flip it back on Non-Islamic violence the same way they try to flip things back to Black on Black violence when something traumatic happens to the Black community at large(ala Charleston).

 

[LuckyLibra619]

Tell me why your position is anything other than that blacks are inherently violent. As a black man I do not entertain debate with anyone who takes that position. And least of all, I do not entertain debate with anyone who will not state their own position.

Nah breh, I never stated that. You just can't defend your arguments so you have no choice but to try to use that to deflect. Carry on.

 

[Nomad1]

And this is exactly why I dislike people always bringing up well what about black on black crime...When it's obvious the majority of crime is race on race....Yet soon as Black folks speak out about being killed by whites generally it goes back to what about Black on Black crime...

Such self hate and deflection typically involves this statement.

but crime is an epidemic in black communities. Why wouldn't you want to bring that up?

 

[Nomad1]

How can we trust murder stats when we all know that murder isn't equally illegal for all races?

what kind of argument is that?

 

[FruitOfTheVale]

Nah breh, I never stated that. You just can't defend your arguments so you have no choice but to try to use that to deflect. Carry on.

You've deflected in every single post, you're deflecting right now.

Let's look at your replies again:

Elaborate on your position then, you've already stated that you think any correlation between entrenched poverty, violence and other "circumstances" as you put it (presumably including institutional racism) is an "excuse".

It looks to me that while you haven't explicitly stated that black people are predisposed to violence, it appears to be the only conclusion you're able to reach.

Every time this convo comes up people tell us Black people are killing one another because of poverty. Can you educate me on the correlation? How does being poor correlate with KILLING other Black men?

Before I do that, I'll ask you again to expound on your position. You've denied that your position is that black people are predisposed to violence irrespective of poverty, racism, inequality, etc. What is your position then?

It's funny I never said anything about Black people being predisposed to violence, that was something you brought up. This was my post that you quoted. Reread it for yourself.

Let's try this again: What is your position?

 

[LuckyLibra619]

You've deflected in every single post, you're deflecting right now.

Let's look at your replies again:
Let's try this again: What is your position?

I've already stated my position. Go back a few pages.

 

[Biscayne]

I already know you LOW IQ brothers who'd rather thrown epitets about cac this and whitey man this.

Do not want to hear the truth or any logic that requires more than a 30 IQ level. LOL

But try this. Take all of the blacks killings in ONLY Chicago, Baltimore, New Orleans and Detroit. Add all of them up and it will be MORE killings than any or ALL WHITE CITIES in AMERICA combined!!!!

That is why black on black crime is criticized!

Matter of fact you couldn't name ONE white city that has the murder rate (of white on white murders) that COMES REMOTELY CLOSE TO the murders in Chicago.


Ladies and Gentleman, that is why black on black crime is focused or criticized. It is because the problem is way WAYYYYYY worse!

The amazing thing about you low IQ folks. No one here will dispute what I said with facts and figures.

All yall will do is cac this and super cac that. And here is a smiley and here is another smiley.

Please Coli one time SURPRISE me and argue using intellect and logic!

Yeah, but those cities account for the higheat rates of Black on Black murder in the nation. You say "Take all the Black killings in ONLY" those cities, as if the Black on Black murder rate wouldn't be cut in half if you took those cities out of the equation. Fact of the matter is, Black on Black violence is VERY centralized. Those cities you named just happen to be the worst of the worst. If you combined the Black populations of those cities, it wouldn't equal not even half of the total Black population of the US. But I'd bet the number of murders in those cities would probably equal nearly half of all the Black on Black murders in this nation(if not more). Black on Black homicide is down in most US cities. Black people being as centralized as we are, it's easier to cherrypick our murder rates. There are predominantly Black towns all across the nation that probably average 1-2 murders per year at most(Ferguson MO was such a town as that. But you wouldn't know given the media coverage in the wake of the Mike Brown verdict). When you have extreme porverty as centralized as it is in urban areas(like how it used to be with Whites and Ethnic Whites pre-WW2 GI Bill) the violence of that particular community is easier to cherrypick. Hell, in Chicago and Baltimores case, you could probably narrow the Black on Black violence down even further into specific neighborhoods within those cities, rather than the Black population in those cities as a whole. But no one does that. All these predominantly Black cities(including thriving ones like Atlanta) are always viewed as giant blobs of Black degeneracy and criminality. People don't want to break it down by income, neighborhoods, circumstances. Its just "X city has alot of Blacks=X city has alot of violence"

 

[Barnett114]

Crime is an epidemic because blacks have the highest rates of poverty in the nation

 

[FruitOfTheVale]

I've already stated my position. Go back a few pages.

Is that right?

There are way more White people in the country than Black people so it comes down to percentages.

Defend your argument with stats then.

The bold is pretty damning but people will probably just take the easy way out and call you a c00n and not address this.

So this is all just media propaganda? There are not actually Black men killing one another at disproportionately high rates?

So basically you can't defend your argument and you're going to deflect by calling me a cac. Carry on.

The only person who got exposed here is YOU. Your arguments are fukking pathetic. You got destroyed time and time again and could only respond by asking people if they were White. What a joke. Hold your L.

I guess people will conveniently ignore this post.

I could've sworn you never did.

 

[Samori Toure]

Those can be contributing factors though, let's not brush that completely off. BUT at the end of the day, a lot of this shyt isn't about poverty, it's about bullshyt. Don't get me wrong their are legit enclaves of places where poverty is high. But to act like cats is out here living in the favela's of Brazil is just, nah...

You make a valid point there; and there is no dispute that a person losing there life is usually all about some bullshyt. And also the murder rate among black people in rural areas are much less than black people in cities. You already know that some black people in rural areas are in some cases much poorer than black people that live in cities, so there has to be reason for the murder spikes in cities.

Crimes stats usually indicate that people are killed by people that they know. There are domestic murders between spouses and/or family members. There are heat of the moment murders where two dudes who know each other get into it and one kills the other. Those may have just been two business partners that or something. I had an elderly uncle that was killed years back by someone that robbed him in his home. My uncle obviously knew his killer, because we learned that he let the person in house. We don't know who killed him, but it wasn't "all black people." There are all kinds of murders; other than just this perceived random shyt of young nikkas just driving down the street shooting at each other. Even those thugs usually know each other.

 

[Biscayne]

That's a disgustingly large gap, but pro blacks will dance around that fact all day long. Check out their footwork.

Its been addressed on page 14.

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

You make a valid point there; and there is no dispute that a person losing there life is usually all about some bullshyt. And also the murder rate among black people in rural areas are much less than black people in cities. You already know that some black people in rural areas are in some cases much poorer than black people that live in cities, so there has to be reason for the murder spikes in cities.

Crimes stats usually indicate that people are killed by people that they know. There are domestic murders between spouses and/or family members. There are heat of the moment murders where two dudes who know each other get into it and one kills the other. Those may have just been two business partners that or something. I had an elderly uncle that was killed years back by someone that robbed him in his home. My uncle obviously knew his killer, because we learned that he let the person in house. We don't know who killed him, but it wasn't "all black people." There are all kinds of murders; other than just this perceived random shyt of young nikkas just driving down the street shooting at each other. Even those thugs usually know each other.

I wanna thank you for actually making this point as well. Because this is absolutely true. Many mostly or all Black cities like Aliceville, AL, Tchula. MS, Unionville, GA, Harlem, FL etc...and it's not just a fukking battlefield of just robbery and killings. Even though all of those places I named are some of the poorest places in All of America. So I do wanna make the point that, POOR Black people can live around mostly POOR Black people without shyt looking like the OK Coral everyday of the year.

 

[NvrCMyNut]

He got the reaction that he got because his whole routine was little more than blackface.

​

Eastern KY and the entire Appalachia region routinely has murder rates comparable with the above.

non-coincidentally enough, it also happens to be the poorest white region in the country. If the law was actually enforced in that area to the same degree that it is in poor black areas and at the same time that area was equally deprived of the same wealth, resources, education, loans, jobs and etc. that poor black neighborhoods throughout the country are deprived of, you'd have your answer.

No it doesn't. Not even close.

Appalachia, VA Crime Rates & Statistics

It's the poorest region in the United States period, people in cities have a greater access to everything, rural crime doesn't compare to inner city crime. So no, this is not the white equivalent to Detroit. There aren't even Hispanic equivalents to the worst black hoods in the country. You can see it in L.A & Chicago, the black hoods are side by side with Hispanic ones but are way worse.

 

[FruitOfTheVale]

I wanna thank you for actually making this point as well. Because this is absolutely true. Many mostly or all Black cities like Aliceville, AL, Tchula. MS, Unionville, GA, Harlem, FL etc...and it's not just a fukking battlefield of just robbery and killings. Even though all of those places I named are some of the poorest places in All of America. So I do wanna make the point that, POOR Black people can live around mostly POOR Black people without shyt looking like the OK Coral everyday of the year.

The community in those areas was not systematically destroyed. Entire neighborhoods were not razed and family wealth (property, businesses, etc.) was not lost in order to build government housing. The highest concentration of violence in American cities nationwide is unsurprisingly in government housing.

Homicide was no more of an epidemic in black neighborhoods like West Oakland, Fillmore, etc. than it was in white neighborhoods until the government actively destroyed them. This subjugation evolved into the prison pipeline.