Anyone?
that is one thing that just doesn't make sense to me. Why is anyone against this?
that is one thing that just doesn't make sense to me. Why is anyone against this?
I've heard this line thrown out time and time again without validation. How does our country's size preclude us from having a single payer option? Everything would just scale up. By this logic the IRS and other national administrative organizations shouldn't function.... but they doit is pretty fukkin huge. comparing 330 million ppl america to 40 million sweden or whatever fukk they do, is stupid
but i agree with it we need to divert money from the military and spend it on healthcare
its how i feel the size, immigration are obstaclesI've heard this line thrown out time and time again without validation. How does our country's size preclude us from having a single payer option? Everything would just scale up. By this logic the IRS and other national administrative organizations shouldn't function.... but they do
The proportionality of those paying into the pool is going to be the same too. Yes you have 330 mill but you also have a larger amount of people paying into the pool too.it is pretty fukkin huge. comparing 330 million ppl america to 40 million sweden or whatever fukk they do, is stupid
but i agree with it we need to divert money from the military and spend it on healthcare
and the more you have to cater to, the more inefficient it isThe proportionality of those paying into the pool is going to be the same too. Yes you have 330 mill but you also have a larger amount of people paying into the pool too.
and i gotta come back to this. hows the VA doingI've heard this line thrown out time and time again without validation. How does our country's size preclude us from having a single payer option? Everything would just scale up. By this logic the IRS and other national administrative organizations shouldn't function.... but they do
This is no different than what we have now. Who do you think is paying for uninsured people's healthcareand the more you have to cater to, the more inefficient it is
plus, the more people paying in is obviously going to be at lower levels of paying in
Just because you read something doesn't mean it's true.and i gotta come back to this. hows the VA doing
i also read once that the tax system would collapse if the public knew the IRS was 90 percent bluffing
None of this addresses why a single payer option wouldn't work in the US. Even if it's less efficient than it is in smaller countries, so what? How much less inefficient would it be? How would it compare to the clusterfukk we had before and during the ACA?look, id love for this country to have universal healthcare. id be happy to pay a little more. although frankly, mass is one of the GOAT states when it comes to that shyt, and we have our shyt together so i dont know why other states cant do it as well
whether people like it or not, this country will probably be forced into single payer sooner or later. People cant afford insurance or drugs.