The point is that ARod's collective play got judged. Everything got critiqued and put under the microscope but most of all, his play was called out. You've already said you flat out won't criticize Jameis until everything else around him meets your standard so why are we even having the discussion? You can be as subjective as you want and always blame coaching or players being hurt as the reason why he's not playing well
Here you go rewriting history. There was always talk about getting Mike more WR help, but he also needed to be a better QB in the pocket, something he never committed to in Atlanta.
He wasn't a typical QB, a left handed QB is rare in the NFL. Rarer still for a QB to be as athletic and mobile and have such a strong arm. Vick did need more WR help and never got it. But this is a moot point. This thread is about Jameis Winston
I never had any expectations of Jameis. He hasn't been a good QB, statistically or based on the eye test. But like I said earlier what are we even arguing? You don't think it's fair to judge him and you already said until he has an entirely healthy and talented team and better play calling that you won't ever judge him so what are we debating. Its everybody else's fault except Jameis, gotcha
has nothing to do with meeting my standard...just pointing out how i dont agree that you can call him mediocre/a disappointment when you see what he's working with team/coaching wise....and i can say the same for you cause you're willing to ignore how bad the team is just to say he's mediocre....
first i was making shyt up, when i proved i wasnt, now i'm rewriting history...lol ok.....yea, there was always talk about getting him help, but it never happened....it stayed just that: talk, no moves were made...and i said he needed to work on things, but just like you pass by the lack of talent for jameis, so did everyone for vick...when they didnt win, he was the reason....and that's how it seems to go for black qbs, unlike their white counterparts....but like you said, it's a moot point...i was making a more general point just using jameis as an example...to continue on...
how can you say you didnt have expectations for him, but then say he hasnt played great so he's been mediocre?....that makes no sense....that means you thought he was supposed to be playing up to some level of yours he hasnt meet....and naw, i never said that...in fact, in this thread, i said there are things he needs to work on, i just wont call him a disappointment nor mediocre like you and others are doing, cause to me, he hasnt been....also, didnt know we were arguing, thought we were just having a discussion with different view points....