Canelo: I think Crawford is way better than Floyd Mayweather

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
23,677
Reputation
5,323
Daps
66,864
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
Recency bias is grabbing a lot of people here. During the fight with Floyd, Floyd neutralized everything and Floyd came forward a lot too. Crawford's win over Canelo was very impressive and was clearly the better man and boxer that night. Floyd made Canelo look like he's an amateur.
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
19,885
Reputation
6,261
Daps
73,571
Reppin
Hackney, London
Two different eras, two different fighters.
Floyd has achieved greatness.
Bud has achieved greatness.

Canelo can have his opinion because he was in the ring with both fighters.

Let's give each fighter their due respect.
 

Black Lightning

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
6,203
Reputation
5,394
Daps
42,890
He was a pup then. You can't compare him to the fighter he is now. Even though he's past his prime now he's still better than the 22 year old version of himself
Not this bullshyt again.

Canelo was 23 with 7 years of pro fight experience. He also had 40+ fights under his belt and was the #1 ranked fighter in his division.
 

steph_harden

Superstar
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
6,430
Reputation
705
Daps
20,551
Canelo Alvarez was 23 years old with 43 professional fights when he lost to Floyd Mayweather (who was 45-0 )and out of his prime at the age of 36.......yet somehow Canelo was too young and inexperienced. Meanwhile at 21 years old, Mike Tyson beat the crap out of Larry Holmes. The spin is amazing.

Not this bullshyt again.

Canelo was 23 with 7 years of pro fight experience. He also had 40+ fights under his belt and was the #1 ranked fighter in his division.

Was Canelo in his prime vs Floyd or not?

And why are we acting like all fights are made equal? 90% of those 40+ fights were against absolute bums

It’s quality of fights not the quantity.

You Floyd fanboys really need to take off the rose colored glasses.

Crawford is just a better overall fighter than Floyd. The advantages that Floyd has (defense/god tier ring iq and adjustments/footwork) are all negated by Bud who is all time great at all of those as well…only he also has ten times the power of Floyd.

And Bud doesn’t even have a “Castillo” on his record either.
 

<<TheStandard>>

I Am A God
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,864
Reputation
2,647
Daps
35,917
Was Canelo in his prime vs Floyd or not?

And why are we acting like all fights are made equal? 90% of those 40+ fights were against absolute bums

It’s quality of fights not the quantity.

You Floyd fanboys really need to take off the rose colored glasses.

Crawford is just a better overall fighter than Floyd. The advantages that Floyd has (defense/god tier ring iq and adjustments/footwork) are all negated by Bud who is all time great at all of those as well…only he also has ten times the power of Floyd.

And Bud doesn’t even have a “Castillo” on his record either.


Was Floyd in his prime vs Canelo?

No he wasn't.

He was 36 years old, had hand problems and basically in his 98 Jordan 2nd 3-peat part of his career.......I've said it before & I'll say it again. The great tragedy of Floyd Mayweather's career is that he became a household name & star AFTER his prime. It would be like if Jordan's first 9 years & first 3 peat were on tape delay & the casual fan only remembered his second three peat.

People are using this Bud-Canelo fight to disparage Floyd Mayweather and I don't like it. People are essentially punishing Floyd for being a naturally smaller fighter who maxed out at 154, a weight he could barely get to. FWIW, the version of Canelo that showed up against Bud the other night would have gotten schooled by Floyd as well.

Canelo wasn't throwing his jab while Crawford worked behind his. Canelo was loading up his left hook and his right hand, yall don't think Floyd Mayweather Jr wouldn't have seen everything he was throwing from a mile away and countered him to death.

I do think Bud would be HELL against Floyd at 147 and personally I think Bud should be favored if they met at 147. I don't think Floyd's prime was ever at welterweight.

Floyd's true prime was at 130, 135 and 140.......this is the problem I have when people talk about Floyd. People treat his entire career as a 19 year prime when his prime likely ended when he retired the first time in 2007.

Remember, Floyd was way more offensive in the smaller weight classes before he had hand problems.
 
Last edited:

<<TheStandard>>

I Am A God
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,864
Reputation
2,647
Daps
35,917
People will say X fighter wasn't in their prime when it comes to Floyd but somehow treat Floyd's entire career like he was in his prime. So everyone else aged except for Floyd Mayweather? Everyone else declined but not Floyd?
 

RedBull

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,937
Reputation
1,161
Daps
16,694
Reppin
On KRS One's nose, eating sunflower seeds.
People will say X fighter wasn't in their prime when it comes to Floyd but somehow treat Floyd's entire career like he was in his prime. So everyone else aged except for Floyd Mayweather? Everyone else declined but not Floyd?
This is what separates him from others, including Bud. Floyd is held to standards others aren’t. He was so good most people don’t know his prime ended way before Canelo. People treat him like his whole career was his prime.
 

theflyest

Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
28,406
Reputation
1,743
Daps
71,647
Reppin
NULL
Was Canelo in his prime vs Floyd or not?

And why are we acting like all fights are made equal? 90% of those 40+ fights were against absolute bums

It’s quality of fights not the quantity.

You Floyd fanboys really need to take off the rose colored glasses.

Crawford is just a better overall fighter than Floyd. The advantages that Floyd has (defense/god tier ring iq and adjustments/footwork) are all negated by Bud who is all time great at all of those as well…only he also has ten times the power of Floyd.

And Bud doesn’t even have a “Castillo” on his record either.

Canelo wasn’t in his prime against Crawford either and one could argue that his 23 year old counterpart was more effective than the mid 30s version of Canelo we have been seeing. Canelo was really good at 23.

Regardless, Canelo isn’t beating boxers the caliber of Mayweather or Crawford at any age.
 

surv2syn

The Culture
Supporter
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
12,930
Reputation
2,784
Daps
23,694
Reppin
NULL
I think it's weight dependent. Floyd at 135 would be hell for Bud at 135. But Bud at 147 would beat Floyd at 147. Bud just a bigger guy and his power at 147 is not properly respected. People should now be looking at what he did at 147 with the hindsight that we seen this dude at 168 hold his own with a 168 Canelo. Those PBC fighters held Bud's career back a lot. He probably would be ruling 160 right now if he coulda got the Spence fight out the way sooner.

I think opposite. May got hit much more at 135-140 and Bud was too strong at those weights. Look at that Corley fight and tell me you think Floyd could beat Bud fighting that way at 140. At 147 Floyd was really strong with better defense. Floyd been in a few firefights with Castillo, Corley and Burton.
 

surv2syn

The Culture
Supporter
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
12,930
Reputation
2,784
Daps
23,694
Reppin
NULL
Canelo wasn’t in his prime against Crawford either and one could argue that his 23 year old counterpart was more effective than the mid 30s version of Canelo we have been seeing. Canelo was really good at 23.

Regardless, Canelo isn’t beating boxers the caliber of Mayweather or Crawford at any age.

I think Canelo is speaking of Bud in terms of fighting. He is a better “fighter” than Floyd. Guys like Canelo don’t respect guys that don’t fight or commit to power punching. He definitely can’t be talking about “boxing”. He was frustrated against both but he was able to touch Bud especially upstairs. He wasn’t able to touch Floyd at all and no matter how much he improved that fight would always go the same way Floyd was old as hell and washed him.
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,905
Reputation
1,050
Daps
26,038
I don't want to get into the who would win debate now but comparing the two Canelo wins it's clear as day Bud's is the more impressive.
A better (green version years before his prime vs slightly past prime version) and bigger Canelo than the one Floyd fought. Also while Floyd could resort to A side shaenigans (catch weight) Bud had to deal with Canelo at Canelo's terms all that while jumping up 2 divisions.
Even if Floyd was never a big 147er let alone 154er the circumstances make Bud's win more impressive. I would say more impressive than any Floyd win too. Floyd's resume is still deeper though
 

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
186,966
Reputation
14,902
Daps
366,948
Reppin
NULL
Was Canelo in his prime vs Floyd or not?

And why are we acting like all fights are made equal? 90% of those 40+ fights were against absolute bums

It’s quality of fights not the quantity.

You Floyd fanboys really need to take off the rose colored glasses.

Crawford is just a better overall fighter than Floyd. The advantages that Floyd has (defense/god tier ring iq and adjustments/footwork) are all negated by Bud who is all time great at all of those as well…only he also has ten times the power of Floyd.

And Bud doesn’t even have a “Castillo” on his record either.


Was Floyd in his prime???

They are 13 years old apart. Was Floyd supposed to wait till his 40s to fight Canelo?? :mjlol:
 
Top