Cardi B Outchea Spitting Facts

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army 2 War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
83,948
Reputation
25,164
Daps
304,577
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
Sounds all well and good unless you understand how quick women will flip. And just how much the court system works in their favor.


Marry a woman and go half on a house? You already know who probably getting the kids and the house. Its important that you know the common law marriage rules in your state. As well as sign a bullet proof prenup if there is such a thing. With that said if shes your woman you shouldnt have her working imo. But if yall are building towards a goal and she is working? Never give her authority over the finances. In terms of shes the one paying bills,handling obligations etc. Control over the money will subconsciously put them in the leadership authority role. Even if its not her money your giving her a taste of power,and power corrupts:respect:
You a full on trick! :skip:



nikka a trick and a rapist!:dead:



"Your woman shouldn't work!":mjlol:
 

Malcolmxxx_23

Let's go panthers
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
108,563
Reputation
-13,962
Daps
329,817
And yet high income men marry high income women on average in America. Doctors are marrying attorneys, lawyers are marrying engineers and the wives aren't quitting their jobs. You must not know a lot of high income people if you think most successful men or women are worrying about home making skills or "sharing" their spouse with an employer. Between the babysitters, tutors, grandparents, and Doordash the household is what it is. The dual income is too valuable. We're talking about the difference between sending your kid to Michigan or Harvard. The nice social club or the elite social club. The good tutor or the best tutor. The incomes matter, which is why successful people marry successful people.
Rich men usually marry career women
That fit feminine ks talking points comes 2nd
 

maxamusa

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
31,580
Reputation
9,282
Daps
81,472
Reppin
Old York
She’s been successful at everything she’s done, came from nothing, and has always kept it pretty solid about social issues when a mic is in her face.

What is there to hate about her?


breh I said everything in like 5X posts.

my position is pretty clear I don't wanna repeat myself.

check the posts; if not ask what u wanna ask and I can say the same shyt I already said.


she said she's oldschool; Im REAL oldschool.
 

Justin Nitsuj

Superstar
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
13,027
Reputation
2,624
Daps
61,706
Yeah take a non black Mexican to speak sense to black people. Ol easily impressed ass clowns :scust:
 

franknitty711

All Star
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
3,015
Reputation
76
Daps
5,324
Reppin
Bay Area
Bolded is key, man. People talk about the ideal of being the sole provider, but forget that that shyt has real world effects on the provider. For a lot of folks, it leads to getting overwhelmed like you mentioned. For others, they stop seeing them as their wife, and another responsibility or obligation. shyt isn't conducive to creating long term healthy relationships as a guaranteed result.
you spot on. I became resentful, used alcohol to deal with the stress till it all came crashing down. She understood, and did what needed to be done to balance it out. I also got that provider programming out of my system, its not relevant for the most of us.
 

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,186
Reputation
5,590
Daps
126,253
Reppin
ATL to MEM
Yep.

Cats with a real bag don't care what money the woman brings in.


He clearly said when the man reaches a certain level of income

He clearly made a statement that doesn’t apply to the overwhelming majority of the populace in 2024 including the people on this site. That’s why people dismissing his statement.

And that whole thought process is 100% relative to your standard of living.

In Atlanta, a single man making 250k on his own is doing well for himself. He certainly isn’t broke by any means and can afford to live a nice lifestyle. Now let’s add in 3 kids and a wife. If the wife doesn’t work, that standard of living is about to take a sharp dive as the amount of house, cars, vacations, and neighborhood you can afford feeding 5 people is different from what you can afford with only 1.

That person who “got the bag” is now living worse than 2 relative non bag getters earning 150k a piece.

Me I was never in the market for a woman who was content with 4 walls and a full fridge. Yeah I can afford her no problem, but that’s not the life I wanted. So I was looking for a woman who was looking to combine incomes to level up both our lifestyles. Luckily I found one.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
58,420
Reputation
-1,849
Daps
151,720
Reppin
Na
You must not have read all my posts in this thread because you take most of my points out of context. I only mentioned SAHMs when it came to billionaires and only mentioned billionaires, when someone claimed I didn't know many rich people. It's not relevant to my original post. I praised the virtues of dual incomes in multiple posts. I just questioned the intellectual honesty of men asking women, what else they bring to the table, since men here constantly blast women for talking about their income and education as something that makes them more attractive than other women.

Men and women overwhelmingly marrying within the same economic stratus is just a proximity thing. Where do most people meet their spouses? School/Church/Work = Proximity. College can break that paradigm and is the primary source of marriages between different social economic backgrounds, but it still falls under the same proximity catalyst. My wife and I are like you and your girlfriend, both 6 fig gang, but the scenarios I mentioned were real world scenarios I myself experienced and what my other married cohort have experienced. I can lay down so many more examples. Just look at the divorce rate of Law School students. Lower income groups are putting off marriage because they can't afford it. While the merging of 2 incomes may look helpful on the surface, the costs of children (Historically, the primary reason for marriage) have costs that far exceed the financial benefits of dual incomes. So your comment about one group viewing marriage as an asset, while the other doesn't, is complete bullshyt.
It's also a values thing
 

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
22,313
Reputation
3,927
Daps
81,482
He clearly made a statement that doesn’t apply to the overwhelming majority of the populace in 2024 including the people on this site. That’s why people dismissing his statement.

And that whole thought process is 100% relative to your standard of living.

In Atlanta, a single man making 250k on his own is doing well for himself. He certainly isn’t broke by any means and can afford to live a nice lifestyle. Now let’s add in 3 kids and a wife. If the wife doesn’t work, that standard of living is about to take a sharp dive as the amount of house, cars, vacations, and neighborhood you can afford feeding 5 people is different from what you can afford with only 1.

That person who “got the bag” is now living worse than 2 relative non bag getters earning 150k a piece.

Me I was never in the market for a woman who was content with 4 walls and a full fridge. Yeah I can afford her no problem, but that’s not the life I wanted. So I was looking for a woman who was looking to combine incomes to level up both our lifestyles. Luckily I found one.
Most people on this board don't have the level of income needed to carry a family comfortably. They are not concerned.

Not wanting a housewife =/= looking to combine incomes. It's not the same.

A lot of wives of rich men work 'fake' but prestigious jobs: they don't it for the money.

Cats who really got it like that don't care what money the woman brings in.
 
Top