Charles Barkley - "The NBA is the worst it's ever been"

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,772
Reputation
4,159
Daps
60,333
Reppin
NULL
You're a fukking idiot.

Speaking of refuting things:






We're not talking about the last 7 years tho fakkit, we're talking right now. Barkley's quote is in reference to the quality of play right now. Like I said, you're an idiot. A grown man should know how to rea and comprehend.

YOU listed a 7 year stretch from the 90s to support your point...how is the most recent 7 years stretch not a valid comparison? We supposed to compare 10 years to this 1/3 of a season or better yet tonight's games? :dead:

It's apparent you got nothing so feel free to respond with name calling and avoidance and projection. Happy New Year.
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,757
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,273
Reppin
NULL
Please STOP it. Yes the bulls were dominant but there was competition. Are u gonna tell e those jazz, suns, spurs, Knicks, pacers, magic, etc teams weren't good. The teams in the 90s were watchable. These teams are horrible record and watching wise. It's too much talent for these teams to look this bad.

There is absolutely competition and fun teams. The Hornets, Raptors, Spurs, Grizzlies, Spurs, Rockets, and OKC are all really great/watchable teams.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,128
Reppin
the ether
Yeah, teams have been able to pack the paint to hinder Lebron from scoring inside, but they wouldn't be able to stop a shorter, slower, fatter, lazier, less athletic version of Lebron who couldn't hit the three or even come close to ballhanding or passing the ball at Lebron's level.

:dead:



But I know! One of the laziest players in the entire NBA, who went full seasons without practicing, would have been a star today because the light would have gone off and he finally would have realized that he needed to work on his shot or play defense with effort!


Just like he works on his golf game and stays intellectually curious, right? :heh:


Keep sniffing that Magic Era Dust and the '90s will keep looking amazing.
 
Last edited:

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
YOU listed a 7 year stretch from the 90s to support your point...how is the most recent 7 years stretch not a valid comparison? We supposed to compare 10 years to this 1/3 of a season or better yet tonight's games? :dead:
I listed a 6 year stretch and the point was that back then there were at least 4 teams that were all title contenders at the same time from one conference compared to now when there aren't even 4 legit title contenders in the whole league. There's never been a season in the last 7 years when there were 4 legit title contenders in one conference. Last year was the closest with 3, and the fall off after the top 3 last year was steep. That's why your comparison doesn't negate my point. If you look at the 96-97 season you had the Jazz, Rockets, Sonics who were all legit title contenders. Then you had the Shaq-Kobe Lakers and that Trailblazer squad on the come up. The West just isn't that deep right now. Even the east was deeper back then compared to now.

You don't have a point which is why you aren't even making an argument. You're just trolling. You had 6 teams win 50+ games in the east back in '96-97. There's 2 in the east on pace to win 50 as of now. What are you talking about?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,128
Reppin
the ether
Maybe ya'all need to think about it this way.

Put Barkley on the 2007 Cavs instead of Lebron. San Antonio packs the paint and dares him to shoot, so Barkley then....? :sas1::sas2:

Oh, but Barkley will make up for his lack of shooting and beat the zone with his superior ballhandling...no, wait...superior speed....no, wait...height....no...finishing ability....no....???

How would Barkley be able to drive inside on these zones when the zone has worked against Lebron and Barkley is Lebron's inferior in literally every skill and attribute that pertains to driving inside?

:jbhmm:
Okay, okay, he'll use his strength in fatness to spend 15 seconds backing down his guy....dammit, they made that illegal. :mjlol:

I got it! He'll just draw the defense inside and then pass out to his shooters! Obviously THAT'S where he's better than Lebron. :russ:



Wait, let's put him on the 2013 Heat, an actual good team. Game 7, is Barkley hitting 5-10 from three to win the game when San Antonio dares him to shoot? He'd be lucky to go 2-10. Thing is, that series would already have been over in 4, because there is no way that Barkley was extending that series with superior defense. Can you even imagining him jumping up to press guys and then getting back on D, carrying through on all the right switches, and then protecting the rim on top of that?

:duck:

Barkley was a shorter, slower, fatter, lazier version of Lebron with inferior shooting, defense, passing, ballhandling, and bball IQ. He's not dominating anything in 2017.



barkley averaged 19.2 ppg and 13.5 reb, mason made it over him because he only played in 53 games.

That likely is true, but it doesn't change the fact that Anthony freaking Mason was considered the #2 power forward in the entire NBA with Barkley missing games. Barkley is playing 28 other teams, and his toughest matchup is 33-year-old Karl Malone....then Anthony Mason...and then he has 26 lesser guys to feast against. Think about that.



exactly, what power forwards from today would give barkley any trouble whatsoever? zones? packing the paint? he'd pass to his shooters like he did when he was trying to draw illegal defenses. he'd steamroll his way to the hoop the same way lebron does now cept there'd be less rim protection in front of him and less possibility of someone taking charges because of the restricted area than he faced during his playing days. barkley would eat every single team in this league alive and own the boards.

Barkley is no comparison to Lebron - he's at least three inches shorter, fatter, much slower, not nearly as strong, and not nearly as good a finisher or passer. If even with all those advantages, Lebron has had trouble at times when teams pack the paint, and if he only won championships by playing spectacular defense and making outside shots in the closeout games, then what the hell would Barkley do?

And before you come with "but Barkley was so strong!", you have to explain how he was giving up 20 pounds to Lebron despite a giant layer of fat and no muscle definition. I know that in the "old days", you didn't need to work out or have muscle definition to be strong because there was magic era dust that allowed layers of fat to work like muscle, but come on now.

1980 Jim Hines would have killed 2012 Usain Bolt in the 100m. I know, I know, you think the competition was lesser then, but a 10.25s in 1980 was WAY faster than a 10.25s today.

:bryan:




sure barkley didnt work hard, but this idea that he wouldnt play any defense and be this huge liability is over the top. he averaged 1.5 steals and .8 blocks per game over his career and his defensive metrics werent bad at all even though he wasnt playing on great defensive teams. during the 96-97 season as a 33-34 year old, 100 defensive rating with him on the floor, 2.8 dbpm.

Those defensive metrics were against his weak competition when we've already established that it was a diluted expansion era and his competition sucked. You had a good 6 expansion teams to bump your stats up against with most of the stars spread out across the league. And cherry-picking 1.5 steals and not even a block a game when you're one of the best athletes in a diluted league full of stiffs doesn't show that you can play good defense.

He'd be a liability because he wasn't playing defense back then (by his own admission), and Anthony Mason isn't the #2 power forward in the NBA anymore.

You think Barkley is stopping Lebron? Staying in front of Blake? Giving up 6 inches to Anthony Davis and LaMarcus Aldridge and Cousins and not letting them do absolutely anything they want both over and around him? Chasing Love and Green and Porzingis around on the perimeter (not to mention how ridiculously easy Love and Porzingis would be able to get their shots off over him)? It probably actually would be fun to watch him working on holding off Zach Randolph and Julius Randle banging inside against him because they're built a bit like 3-4" taller versions of Barkley...but we've already covered 10 power forwards right there, and haven't even mentioned Paul Millsap or Jabari Parker or what the hell Barkley is going to do when Durant or Carmelo slides over to the 4.

Here's a stat for you. Right now, Draymond Green is eighteenth among power forwards in three-point shooting, and Green is a better three-point shooter than Barkley ever was.

Sorry, but today you ain't hiding behind Anthony Mason being the 2nd-best power forward to have to go up against all year.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,128
Reppin
the ether
The 90s Rockets, Jazz, Sonics, Suns, and Spurs all made the NBA finals between '93-98. The fukk are you talking about?

Spurs? :usure:

Spurs didn't make the Finals in any of those years. By the time the Spurs got Timmy and were actually good, nearly all those teams were gone.




How many contenders have been in the west over the last 5 seasons? Only 3 teams that have been true title contenders in the west have been Spurs, Warriors, and Thunder. Now it's only 2.

If you're going to try to stretch seven seasons from 1993 to 1999 in order to include the 1993 WCF champ Suns and the 1999 WCF champ Spurs at the same time, then to be fair you have to go from 2011-2017, and then you've got Dallas and the Lakers in your "competitors" window as well on top of Warriors/Spurs/Thunder. Comparing 7 seasons to 5 seasons in order to create the narrative you want is just dumb.



Let's just compare the league now to the 96-97 season. There is no comparison:pachaha:

"Look, I can find ONE season from twenty years ago where there was more competition at the top than ONE season from now, therefore the NBA is worse than it's ever been!"

:comeon:

In 1997, the best team in the West had an unathletic 34-year-old 6'1" White American running the point and an unathletic 33-year-old 6'3" White American at the shooting guard, and those were the 2nd and 3rd best players on the team by a LONG shot.

And even then, the only teams in the entire West who could threaten them were a Hakeem-Clyde-Barkley superteam and the Payton-Kemp Sonics, and both of them lost. To a team led by a couple barely-six-feet-tall White guys with a combined age of nearly 70.

Don't even start talking about the Lakers. Kobe was 18 years old and Utah completely washed them.

And in the East, the Bulls were sleepwalking to an 11-2 record over Miami/Atlanta/Washington teams who didn't do a thing in the league before or after Jordan left. So don't talk like there was more than 1 contender on that side.

That's it. Chicago-Utah-Houston-Seattle. Those are your title hopes in your great competitive year. Three teams that had shoved together a trifecta of old talent and one team that has to rely on Shawn fukking Kemp.




It's not the same as it's always been and you people expose yourselves when you say that. You've got two teams with a realistic shot to come out the west and really just one in the east. Now compare that to 20 years ago in the mid 90s when you had multiple championship contenders. In the west alone you had the Rockets, Sonics, Suns, Jazz, and Spurs who were all legit contenders during the same time period. I seriously don't know what you people get out of denying the obvious. It's obvious that the level of play and competition is shyt right now, what exactly do you get out of pretending that it's always been this way?

You can't compare one year to an entire 7-year-long era. That's just stupid. You keep doing it over and over again.

And "it's obvious the level of play is shyt right now"? How the hell do you get that? Modern players are at the height of NBA history in every meaningful way.

Shooting skills? GOAT
Ballhandling skills? GOAT
Passing skills? GOAT
Offensive schemes? GOAT
Defensive schemes? GOAT

What "level of play" are we missing that was around in the 1990s? Being able to grab guys? Barkley's 15-second-backdown move?




YOU listed a 7 year stretch from the 90s to support your point...how is the most recent 7 years stretch not a valid comparison? We supposed to compare 10 years to this 1/3 of a season or better yet tonight's games? :dead:

It's apparent you got nothing so feel free to respond with name calling and avoidance and projection. Happy New Year.

And he's obviously only watched highlights and classic playoff games from that era too. The day-to-day quality of play in that era was so much worse than today that he would have shut his mouth long ago if he could remember it even 50% accurately.
 

FakeNews

Superstar
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
24,310
Reputation
1,569
Daps
62,355
Reppin
NULL
On his complaints about the NBA having no parity: since Michael Jordan left the Bulls, eight teams have won an NBA Title. During Jordan’s peak, three teams won the NBA title (from 1989-1998), and from 1978-88, four teams won the title.

How about his idea that the team with the best players always wins the NBA Championship? Was that the case in 2011 when the Mavs upset the Heat and the Big Three? Or even last year when the Cavs beat the Warriors? And let’s not even get into analytics, since most every team uses them in some way, and many of those ways aren’t known to the public.

Most everyone watching the NBA except Chuck seems to think the NBA is at a new peak in popularity as well as the quality of the product. Whether you think Chuck actually believes what he’s saying, or whether it’s just Chuck being Chuck to be contrarian and drive conversation and posts like this, his rants on the game are getting weirder and weirder

Charles Barkley believes the NBA is 'the worst it's ever been'

The NBA is perhaps as good as it’s ever been. The product is stellar, revenues are up, interest in the league is spiking, and the players are as well-trained, prepared, and analyzed as they’ve ever been..




Charles Barkley: NBA is worst it’s ever been (VIDEO)
 

Dark is the night

You Dont Eyeball Me Boy
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Messages
434
Reputation
-330
Daps
1,049
For once, that c00n ass bamma aint lying

Goddamn league look like a damn informercial for dating out with all these 3 ball shooting light brights running around
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,757
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,273
Reppin
NULL
For once, that c00n ass bamma aint lying

Goddamn league look like a damn informercial for dating out with all these 3 ball shooting light brights running around

Yeah, guys like Harden, Derozan, Lowry, Kyrie, Lebron, Durant, Cousins, Embid, and the like are just light skinned 3 point shooters, huh?
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,757
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,273
Reppin
NULL
Curry, Klay, MCW, Gordon, Levine, deron

We could do this shyt all day

MCW is a three point shooter :mjlol:

I named a bunch of non-light skinned leading scorers and you find back with MCW, Zach Lavine, and Deron Williams? :mjlol:

Wade, Rondo, Mike Conley, Z-Bo, Whiteside, Giannis (Not a 3 point shooter), Wiggins, Okafor, Milsap, Jimmy Butler, Kawhi, Aldridge, Jrue Holiday, Tyreke Evans, Schroeder, Draymond Green, Durant, etc

But keep going since you're naming three point light bright snipers like MCW :mjlol:
 

Dark is the night

You Dont Eyeball Me Boy
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Messages
434
Reputation
-330
Daps
1,049
MCW is a three point shooter :mjlol:

I named a bunch of non-light skinned leading scorers and you find back with MCW, Zach Lavine, and Deron Williams? :mjlol:

Wade, Rondo, Mike Conley, Z-Bo, Whiteside, Giannis (Not a 3 point shooter), Wiggins, Okafor, Milsap, Jimmy Butler, Kawhi, Aldridge, Jrue Holiday, Tyreke Evans, Schroeder, Draymond Green, Durant, etc

But keep going since you're naming three point light bright snipers like MCW :mjlol:

nikka you the one bringing up nikkas that got like 20 seasons in like lebron and wade, im talking these new nikkas since the subject is the league of today
 

Illin Degenerate

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
2,383
Reputation
425
Daps
3,973
Reppin
NULL
the whole idea of backing your man down 5+ seconds was to draw an illegal defense. its not that he relied on it and would be powerless to score without it. you go on these lebron diatribes when you forget they wouldnt be guarded by the same players, and no the power forwards today are not better post defenders than the power forwards from his era. yes there are more of a variety of offensive threats he would face, but he wouldnt face nearly as good of defenders as he faced in his day. do you realize how silly you sound saying lebron couldnt do it vs this team so barkley couldnt? they absolutely arent the same players true, but they arent playing the same positions either. do you think the mavs in 2010 would have rather faced lebron who couldnt post up anyone, or barkley? do you now see the flaw in that argument? youre going on a diatribe as if i said barkley was a better all around player when that has no bearing on how barkley being guarded against different players than lebron would fare.

and youre bringing up these names of players that he wouldnt necessarily be guarding. why would barkley be guarding cousins when theres a kosta koufus around? you seem fixated on anthony mason making all nba, but youre ignoring that vin baker made that same all nba team. chris webber, shawn kemp, antonio mcdyess, rasheed wallace, christian laettner, the great tom gugliotta and derrick coleman were also capable scorers where barkley would have a severe height disadvantage. the difference would be yes he'd face more 3 point shooters, but i dont think that would make him this sieve that would have to be benched.

funny you mention, love, randolph, and aldridge, they've been able to thrive in this era despite not being particularly good defenders, but barkley would struggle. the raptors started luis scola at pf last year and won 56 games, but barkley would struggle.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
Save the essays chump. In th '96-97 season you had 10 teams win at least 50 games. This year there's barely 7 on pace to win 50. There were better toms and a higher quality of play back then. Your trying to cloud the issue with your stay boy geek shyt doesn't change that.
 
Top