If that's all you are trying to prove, that was taken care of the first four pages. There have been LOTS of years where only 2-4 teams had a serious chance at the title, and some where there were more. That's always been true. Cherry-picking one year from the 1990s and comparing it to one year now is meaningless.
I'm not going to drown in low-quality arguments this year, so I'm done with this thread.
Bookmark and tag me when a fat 6'5" lazy player who doesn't try on D wins MVP on the strength of his post game. When a 210 lb White guy with suspect athleticism is a dominant post player on title teams. And when having two 6'2" 35-year-old White Americans as your clear #2 and #3 can get you to back-to-back Finals and threaten to go 7 games against four HOFers including the GOAT.
Until those unlikely things happen, I'll hold that there wasn't any magic dust floating around in the 1990s, and the huge increase in talent pool and improvement in talent development really does mean that the field is just too strong now to allow it.
Those teams weren't that good either. That's the issue. You got the Bulls with two superstars, nice players around the superstars. A bench stud in Toni and you expect anyone to beat them is insane. Especially with no zone defense, how do you stop Jordan or Pippen? Most contending teams in the 90s didn't have but one superstar and two stars. The bad and average ones didn't even have a star.
It was a weak era. The crack cocaine era of the mid to late 80 ruined the 90s and Jordan benefited from that. I mean, Vince Carter had a superior statistical career to Reggie Miller. This was a star of the 90s. Lowry is putting up better numbers than any PG in the 90s. shyt, this generation of front office and analytics guys have really changed what the NBA is and on top of that, this is by far the most work ethic the league has ever had.
It's usually a pretty lazy league where in the summer guys would play pick up and tournaments. Now everyone doing some crazy training and has personal coaches and team coaches developing them. To think this started in the early 2000s with Mark Cuban.

@ the 90s Pacers.
nikkas really hyping up the 90s Pacers.
Why are y'all comparing those teams to current teams
Let's looks at the quote for the 10th time
The NBA sucks cause it's only 3-4 good teams and the rest are trash
Did he say the 90s teams could beat these teams? Hell nah.
What he is saying is 26 teams in the league ain't worth shyt compared to the 3-4 good teams and it makes it completely trash to watch.
Now you might not think watching prime Jordan, Ewing, Olajuwon, Shaq, Miller, Malone, Barkley, Stockton, Payton.... to be followed by prime Kobe, Garnett, mutumbo, carter, iverson, Allen, etc was good competition.........
but to the rest of the basketball world. From the dudes playing now to the coaches to media to owners. It was fukking amazing
Now who we watching? The spurs, the warriors, the cavs and maybe the clippers
That's it. Ain't nobody tuning in to the sixers and the bucs like they would if it was Allen vs iverson. Nobody watching the nuggets vs the jazz like mutumbo vs Malone. Nobody is watching the fukking pacers.
Not only are they not watching it. They don't even care about the entire regular season anymore until the playoffs start. And even then they pretty much got the finals locked up.
And that's been the case since before the season started
That's a good league to you
In comparison look at the NFL. nikkas will literally watch ANY football game. Don't matter who playing. Don't matter where in the season. It will be watched by nikkas who don't even know who's playing the game.
NBA wishes it could have that. Soon as you hear. Oh it's the heat vs the nuggets. Channel changed