yea he needs to go. like yesterday
Charlie Kirk’s death…
- Thread starter Hopeofmypeople
- Start date
1/24
@spooked75
I have spent the last 3 days painfully sitting through Charlie Kirk debates. Here are my conclusions:
He was a political grifter pandering to his MAGA base for personal and monetary gain.
He purposely chose divisive topics to maintain relavence.
His videos were manipulated, only showing arguments where Kirk was succesful
When facing actual intellectuals or prepared students, Kirk's arguments were repeatedly crushed, exposing Kirk for the uneducated buffoon that he was.
Kirk was highly succesful against random, unprepared, and often emotional university students, who often didn't have any debating experience, or the media experience he had.
Kirk was a predatory oppurtunist who prioritized entertainment value over genuine intellectual value.
Kirk operated as a sophisticated political grifter who successfully monetized cultural resentment and political division.
His dramatic personal enrichment, calculated message evolution, strategic provocation, and opportunistic positioning all point to someone who prioritized personal gain over genuine conviction
His ability to extract millions from donors while living in luxury estates represents a classic grifter model - exploiting the genuine concerns and grievances of his audience for personal enrichment while offering them little substantive improvement to their actual circumstances.
2/24
@spooked75
Its strange that a critique of Kirk's style becomes "He spent 3 days watching videos and decided Kirk needed to die."
I have stated my empathy for Kirks death many times and ridiculed those celebrating his death, my record on that is clear.
I stand by my critque and if you can't handle that, that's your problem, not mine.
His entire income model was based on cultural resdentment and political division and it was so successful he garnered $12 million in personal wealth, a $400,000 per year salary, and 3 luxury estates from selling the grift and pushing the MAGA narrative.
A truly great man, one brillant and worthy of rememberence in service to his nation would have been one who put aside politics and said "Look, this is what we need to do heal our nation and and truly Make America Great Again"
However he had no interest in this, never did. He stuck to his MAGA base and Trump's talking points and made millions doing it.
For those saying his "so-called" activism predates Trump, you're right. He was a part of the tea party movement, and so was I
The Tea Party movement was leaderless and in the wake of Obama's victory in 2008 it went looking for a stalwart leader, and that leader was Donald Trump and became MAGA. Thaty's when Kirks income began to soar, he didn't build that wealtyh overnight.
I voted for Trump in 2016 and in 2020, however after 6 January I distanced myself from Trump and MAGA.
I've always been moderate in my views, Trump changed that. Trump took the Tea Party movement and turned it into an identity-driven, personality-centric movement focused on nationalism, cultural grievances, and loyalty soley to Trump.
Trump and MAGA have continuously doubled down on division and hate, and that alone has made the left step up it's rhetoric.
If you want to heal a nation you don't do it by worshipping grifters and snake oil salesmen.
The United States has problems, but Trump is going to solve them and has no interest in it and neither does his base.
It so bad that in the United States, if you're not MAGA, you're a radical leftist, evil, and you should be killed.
That's not healing a nation, that's a prelude to destruction and both Kirk and Trump contributed to that.
3/24
@authenticTERF
When you use inflammatory words like ‘predatory’ and ‘opportunist’ (words usually reserved for sexual deviants) it discredits everything else you’ve said.
4/24
@spooked75
What? You mean like your President and the movement that exalts and worships him as a messiah?
He preyed on naive, emotional university students and he made money from that, million in fact. Get over it.
5/24
@mxfish7
It’s easy to sit on the sidelines and throw stones, but calling Charlie Kirk a “grifter” just shows you missed what actually made him effective. Was he provocative? Absolutely. That’s the point of debate—to challenge people, not lull them to sleep with academic jargon.
The fact that he went into rooms full of hostile students, often with no moderator protecting him, and still got people talking proves he wasn’t afraid of confrontation. That alone sets him apart from most so-called “intellectuals” who hide behind gated classrooms or filtered media outlets.
And let’s be real…every political figure raises money, lives well, and sharpens their message. That’s not “grifting,” that’s politics. The difference is Charlie gave a voice to people who are normally told to shut up. You don’t build one of the fastest-growing movements in America just by being a “buffoon.”
If you think he was crushed every time he debated, then why did the Left spend years trying to cancel him, label him, and demonize him? You don’t waste that much energy on someone irrelevant.
Charlie wasn’t perfect, but he stood for convictions that resonated with millions of everyday Americans. Reducing that to “grifting” is lazy…it says more about your bias than his legacy.
6/24
@spooked75
He rode a wave of MAGA populism. He also wasn't a political figure, he was a provocateur and a podcaster.
7/24
@SouthernOracle6
The Cambridge debate was great.
I enjoy actual debates. They're an opportunity to learn things. Most his stuff was prescripted talking points, and he'd guide the convo to those points. Instead of the natural flow in a debate. Imo.
8/24
@spooked75
His model was to debate random people, on topics that he was fully prepared to debate on, and those kids were mostly first year students. When confonted with an argument he couldn't refute he deflected.
He debated at one Ivy league school, and was crushed.
When he went to Cambridge he was also crushed.
9/24
@robhopp81
If this is true, then why is countries all around the world mourning him? Charlie held the minds and hearts of most of our young and countless people across the world!!
10/24
@spooked75
Nobody knew where Ukraine was either until Russia invaded it. Prior to Charlie Kirks death people in Europe barely knew who he was, after his death his popularity exploded with nationalist and far-right movemments here who paint him as a martyr
11/24
@AllenGrove15
If you actually did watch Charlie Kirks debates, which I seriously doubt, then you have a major problem- your mind is incapable of processing reality without altering it according to a completely warped agenda that has completely supplanted your capacity for rational thought.
12/24
@spooked75
He rode a wave of MAGA populism and benefited from it. That's exactly why he debated, he didn't offer any ways to fix ANYTHING, he literally pushed the MAGA narrative.
13/24
@Chefgeoff772128
Love it still didn’t need to be eliminated
14/24
@spooked75
No, Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to be killed, and I've never stated anything saying that. I think he was charismatic, loved by his base and used them to make millions.
15/24
@BeerdedMTBr
This is the root of my dislike for him, and lesser are his “views”. He and others like him (loomer, Carlson, et al) are merchants of hate. I have no idea what they actually believe but know they’ll say anything to keep riding that wave.
Im Still 100% opposed to political violence
16/24
@spooked75
I've neveer supported political violence, howeveer these outliers of society are being used yby the Trump Administration too crack down on dissent.
By the end of Trump's term the US will be another authoritarian state like Russia.
17/24
@ClanPetrie
I'd pretty much agree with this.
Question is: and?
What does that matter in terms of using political violence?
18/24
@spooked75
Politcal violence is never a way forward, on anything, and I've never said it was, nor have I ever said Kirk deserved to die, unlike accusations from the brainrot addicted MAGA cult.
No one had to listen to Kirk, no one had to attend his rallies, watch his videos; No one was forced to watch him.
If no one had engaged with Kirk he'd have been a nobody, but people took the bait and that's what he wanted and he made millions from it.
19/24
@togo_miles
This diatribe would work well if people didn't have access to the debates videos
20/24
@spooked75
He debated for clout and money, to "own the libs" that's all he did, he didn't add anything at all.
21/24
@mego73
"I didn't think he deserved to die but..."
22/24
@spooked75
23/24
@DecentAmerican1
Kirk was willing to debate people who hated him. I can't think of any liberal willing to consistently do the same. He had significant impact in convincing young Americans about the toxicity and dangers of liberalism. He needed money for that, so he did what he needed to do.
24/24
@spooked75
I think he was a charismatic young man, he certainly didn't deserve to die, I can't think of anyone that does, however in this instance, he killer does.
However you're being very disengenous. You answer is that his replacement of the toxicity and dangers of "liberalism" is any better than replacing it with the toxicity and dangers of MAGA populism
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@spooked75
I have spent the last 3 days painfully sitting through Charlie Kirk debates. Here are my conclusions:
He was a political grifter pandering to his MAGA base for personal and monetary gain.
He purposely chose divisive topics to maintain relavence.
His videos were manipulated, only showing arguments where Kirk was succesful
When facing actual intellectuals or prepared students, Kirk's arguments were repeatedly crushed, exposing Kirk for the uneducated buffoon that he was.
Kirk was highly succesful against random, unprepared, and often emotional university students, who often didn't have any debating experience, or the media experience he had.
Kirk was a predatory oppurtunist who prioritized entertainment value over genuine intellectual value.
Kirk operated as a sophisticated political grifter who successfully monetized cultural resentment and political division.
His dramatic personal enrichment, calculated message evolution, strategic provocation, and opportunistic positioning all point to someone who prioritized personal gain over genuine conviction
His ability to extract millions from donors while living in luxury estates represents a classic grifter model - exploiting the genuine concerns and grievances of his audience for personal enrichment while offering them little substantive improvement to their actual circumstances.
2/24
@spooked75
Its strange that a critique of Kirk's style becomes "He spent 3 days watching videos and decided Kirk needed to die."
I have stated my empathy for Kirks death many times and ridiculed those celebrating his death, my record on that is clear.
I stand by my critque and if you can't handle that, that's your problem, not mine.
His entire income model was based on cultural resdentment and political division and it was so successful he garnered $12 million in personal wealth, a $400,000 per year salary, and 3 luxury estates from selling the grift and pushing the MAGA narrative.
A truly great man, one brillant and worthy of rememberence in service to his nation would have been one who put aside politics and said "Look, this is what we need to do heal our nation and and truly Make America Great Again"
However he had no interest in this, never did. He stuck to his MAGA base and Trump's talking points and made millions doing it.
For those saying his "so-called" activism predates Trump, you're right. He was a part of the tea party movement, and so was I
The Tea Party movement was leaderless and in the wake of Obama's victory in 2008 it went looking for a stalwart leader, and that leader was Donald Trump and became MAGA. Thaty's when Kirks income began to soar, he didn't build that wealtyh overnight.
I voted for Trump in 2016 and in 2020, however after 6 January I distanced myself from Trump and MAGA.
I've always been moderate in my views, Trump changed that. Trump took the Tea Party movement and turned it into an identity-driven, personality-centric movement focused on nationalism, cultural grievances, and loyalty soley to Trump.
Trump and MAGA have continuously doubled down on division and hate, and that alone has made the left step up it's rhetoric.
If you want to heal a nation you don't do it by worshipping grifters and snake oil salesmen.
The United States has problems, but Trump is going to solve them and has no interest in it and neither does his base.
It so bad that in the United States, if you're not MAGA, you're a radical leftist, evil, and you should be killed.
That's not healing a nation, that's a prelude to destruction and both Kirk and Trump contributed to that.
3/24
@authenticTERF
When you use inflammatory words like ‘predatory’ and ‘opportunist’ (words usually reserved for sexual deviants) it discredits everything else you’ve said.
4/24
@spooked75
What? You mean like your President and the movement that exalts and worships him as a messiah?
He preyed on naive, emotional university students and he made money from that, million in fact. Get over it.
5/24
@mxfish7
It’s easy to sit on the sidelines and throw stones, but calling Charlie Kirk a “grifter” just shows you missed what actually made him effective. Was he provocative? Absolutely. That’s the point of debate—to challenge people, not lull them to sleep with academic jargon.
The fact that he went into rooms full of hostile students, often with no moderator protecting him, and still got people talking proves he wasn’t afraid of confrontation. That alone sets him apart from most so-called “intellectuals” who hide behind gated classrooms or filtered media outlets.
And let’s be real…every political figure raises money, lives well, and sharpens their message. That’s not “grifting,” that’s politics. The difference is Charlie gave a voice to people who are normally told to shut up. You don’t build one of the fastest-growing movements in America just by being a “buffoon.”
If you think he was crushed every time he debated, then why did the Left spend years trying to cancel him, label him, and demonize him? You don’t waste that much energy on someone irrelevant.
Charlie wasn’t perfect, but he stood for convictions that resonated with millions of everyday Americans. Reducing that to “grifting” is lazy…it says more about your bias than his legacy.
6/24
@spooked75
He rode a wave of MAGA populism. He also wasn't a political figure, he was a provocateur and a podcaster.
7/24
@SouthernOracle6
The Cambridge debate was great.
I enjoy actual debates. They're an opportunity to learn things. Most his stuff was prescripted talking points, and he'd guide the convo to those points. Instead of the natural flow in a debate. Imo.
8/24
@spooked75
His model was to debate random people, on topics that he was fully prepared to debate on, and those kids were mostly first year students. When confonted with an argument he couldn't refute he deflected.
He debated at one Ivy league school, and was crushed.
When he went to Cambridge he was also crushed.
9/24
@robhopp81
If this is true, then why is countries all around the world mourning him? Charlie held the minds and hearts of most of our young and countless people across the world!!
10/24
@spooked75
Nobody knew where Ukraine was either until Russia invaded it. Prior to Charlie Kirks death people in Europe barely knew who he was, after his death his popularity exploded with nationalist and far-right movemments here who paint him as a martyr
11/24
@AllenGrove15
If you actually did watch Charlie Kirks debates, which I seriously doubt, then you have a major problem- your mind is incapable of processing reality without altering it according to a completely warped agenda that has completely supplanted your capacity for rational thought.
12/24
@spooked75
He rode a wave of MAGA populism and benefited from it. That's exactly why he debated, he didn't offer any ways to fix ANYTHING, he literally pushed the MAGA narrative.
13/24
@Chefgeoff772128
Love it still didn’t need to be eliminated
14/24
@spooked75
No, Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to be killed, and I've never stated anything saying that. I think he was charismatic, loved by his base and used them to make millions.
15/24
@BeerdedMTBr
This is the root of my dislike for him, and lesser are his “views”. He and others like him (loomer, Carlson, et al) are merchants of hate. I have no idea what they actually believe but know they’ll say anything to keep riding that wave.
Im Still 100% opposed to political violence
16/24
@spooked75
I've neveer supported political violence, howeveer these outliers of society are being used yby the Trump Administration too crack down on dissent.
By the end of Trump's term the US will be another authoritarian state like Russia.
17/24
@ClanPetrie
I'd pretty much agree with this.
Question is: and?
What does that matter in terms of using political violence?
18/24
@spooked75
Politcal violence is never a way forward, on anything, and I've never said it was, nor have I ever said Kirk deserved to die, unlike accusations from the brainrot addicted MAGA cult.
No one had to listen to Kirk, no one had to attend his rallies, watch his videos; No one was forced to watch him.
If no one had engaged with Kirk he'd have been a nobody, but people took the bait and that's what he wanted and he made millions from it.
19/24
@togo_miles
This diatribe would work well if people didn't have access to the debates videos
20/24
@spooked75
He debated for clout and money, to "own the libs" that's all he did, he didn't add anything at all.
21/24
@mego73
"I didn't think he deserved to die but..."
22/24
@spooked75
23/24
@DecentAmerican1
Kirk was willing to debate people who hated him. I can't think of any liberal willing to consistently do the same. He had significant impact in convincing young Americans about the toxicity and dangers of liberalism. He needed money for that, so he did what he needed to do.
24/24
@spooked75
I think he was a charismatic young man, he certainly didn't deserve to die, I can't think of anyone that does, however in this instance, he killer does.
However you're being very disengenous. You answer is that his replacement of the toxicity and dangers of "liberalism" is any better than replacing it with the toxicity and dangers of MAGA populism
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
TheKongoEmpire
The First Men
Hasn't happen yet unfortunately. Maybe if there weren't all those abortions but even then, I don't know how much more the total population would be. maybe 20% instead of 13%.
Crying over Charlie Kirk is OFFENSIVE!
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=k3bjUwFmevw&hl=en-US
Channel Info Femi
Subscribers: 40.9K
Description
Transcripts
Show transcript
Show transcript
Charlie Kirk's statements don't get better in context.
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=kzk1Za39dtI&hl=en-US
Channel Info Texas Paul
Subscribers: 210K
Description
Transcripts
Show transcript
Show transcript
Erratic415
Superstar
Dave Portnoy said Donald Trump played a ‘huge part’ in Charlie Kirk’s death and MAGA is raging
│
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
Posted on Mon Sep 15 14:24:30 2025 UTC
www.silive.com
Dave Portnoy said Donald Trump played a ‘huge part’ in Charlie Kirk’s death and MAGA is raging
It appears Trump's backers did not appreciate or stick around for the full context of what Portnoy said.
www.silive.com
Commented on Mon Sep 15 14:31:35 2025 UTC
"His assassination attempt, there’s like a three-hour period of, ‘Oh, let’s tone down the rhetoric,’ and then we are right back to it.”
He's right.
Trump is trying to do a January 6 against the left. He's riling up the nut jobs to attack us, it's as clear as day. Trump wants a civil war and the cult will oblige.
"His assassination attempt, there’s like a three-hour period of, ‘Oh, let’s tone down the rhetoric,’ and then we are right back to it.”
He's right.
Trump is trying to do a January 6 against the left. He's riling up the nut jobs to attack us, it's as clear as day. Trump wants a civil war and the cult will oblige.
│
│
│ Commented on Mon Sep 15 14:42:59 2025 UTC
│
│ This is a trend for Trump in general. He always reverts back to divisiveness and childish bs.
│
│
│ This is a trend for Trump in general. He always reverts back to divisiveness and childish bs.
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 15:27:45 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ His good friend of many years, Jeffrey Epstein, is on record talking about it. he talked about how Trump's usual tactics are to get his employees to fight against one another.
│ │
│ │ like, he hosted an entire reality show about it. we shouldn't be surprised
│ │
│ │
│ │ His good friend of many years, Jeffrey Epstein, is on record talking about it. he talked about how Trump's usual tactics are to get his employees to fight against one another.
│ │
│ │ like, he hosted an entire reality show about it. we shouldn't be surprised
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 16:05:17 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ I’d like to have a word with Mark Burnett about that. He made the idiots of America think Donald Trump was a good businessman. Without him—and his silence about the truth—we would not be where we are now.
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ I’d like to have a word with Mark Burnett about that. He made the idiots of America think Donald Trump was a good businessman. Without him—and his silence about the truth—we would not be where we are now.
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 16:57:15 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ He bankrupted a casino, that's all you need to know about his business skills lmfao
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ He bankrupted a casino, that's all you need to know about his business skills lmfao
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 17:38:32 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ He actually bankrupted two casinos a steak company a wine company a clothing company a college . his family stole from their own charity which they were found guilty the kids had to go to school and were not allowed to run a charity. He would declare bankruptcy to not pay contractors and his idol Cohn would tell him to just keep suing the opposition will run out of money and you will get away with it
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ He actually bankrupted two casinos a steak company a wine company a clothing company a college . his family stole from their own charity which they were found guilty the kids had to go to school and were not allowed to run a charity. He would declare bankruptcy to not pay contractors and his idol Cohn would tell him to just keep suing the opposition will run out of money and you will get away with it
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 17:51:19 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ He also bankrupted an airline, trump Shuttle.
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ He also bankrupted an airline, trump Shuttle.
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ Commented on Mon Sep 15 17:59:21 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ He actually took that over and rebranded a functioning, profitable shuttle that I liked to use out of LaGuardia. It tanked pretty quickly after he put his name on it and jacked up the prices for no reason. I then shifted over to the cheaper options.
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ He actually took that over and rebranded a functioning, profitable shuttle that I liked to use out of LaGuardia. It tanked pretty quickly after he put his name on it and jacked up the prices for no reason. I then shifted over to the cheaper options.
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
Commented on Mon Sep 15 16:10:50 2025 UTC
Democrats and the left in general have condemned political violence. I'd love to see a single example of a Democratic leader or large media figure promoting violence. Compare that to Trump and a large amount of right wing figures. Explicitly encouraging political violence.
Where has a decade of this pattern gotten us? More and more right wing dominated political violence. This is just reality. It's fact. Advancing Justice Through Science Oh, they took down the report showing right wing political violence is the vast majority? Good thing we have an https://archive.is/1t1rm
Where will continued condemnations of political violence get us? Because as far as I can tell, even when maga murders politicians in their homes the right will simply claim they were a secret liberal.
They'll just make shyt up and use it as justification to continue escalating political violence.
You know where this road leads? One side refusing to take a stand against absurdity and one side continuing to become more and more violent? Dark places. It leads to really, really fukking dark places.
Q: What do you say to people who are saying the Democrats need to lower the temperatures?
A: Oh please. Why don't you start with the president of the United States, right? and every ugly meme he has posted and every ugly word. Uh he is the leader of this nation. And I think that when he's posting things like he did just a couple of days ago, trying to show an entire city on fire and a reference to helicopters in in effect throwing people out of helicopters and showing himself as some kind of big chest beating uh uh uh threat. Uh then I just don't want to hear this from the Republicans.
She's right. As a leader it's Trump's job to lower tension in the wake of political violence, yet he continues to do the exact opposite.
And
Trump doubles down on blaming 'radical left' after vow to go after political violence
During an appearance on "Fox & Friends," Trump was asked about the presence of radical individuals on both sides of the aisle and how it can be fixed to bring the country together.
"Because we have radicals on the right as well. We have radicals on the left. People have gotten are watching all of these videos and cheering. Some people are cheering that Charlie was, was killed. How do we fix this country? How do we come back together?" co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked the president.
"I'll tell you something that's going to get me in trouble, but I couldn't care less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don't want to see crime. They don't want to see crime. Worried about the border. They're saying, We don't want these people coming in. We don't want you burning our shopping centers. We don't want you shooting our people in the middle of the street," Trump said.
"The radicals on the left are the problem," Trump continued, "and they're vicious and they're horrible and they're politically savvy, although they want men and women sports, they want transgender for everyone, they want open borders."
How the hell do we continue letting this one sided escalation keep going on unopposed? For the nay sayers, I'm not talking violence. I'm talking about how we need to stop cucking ourselves to a completely fictional narrative from people who don't live in any reality other than cult reality.
Democrats and the left in general have condemned political violence. I'd love to see a single example of a Democratic leader or large media figure promoting violence. Compare that to Trump and a large amount of right wing figures. Explicitly encouraging political violence.
Where has a decade of this pattern gotten us? More and more right wing dominated political violence. This is just reality. It's fact. Advancing Justice Through Science Oh, they took down the report showing right wing political violence is the vast majority? Good thing we have an https://archive.is/1t1rm
Where will continued condemnations of political violence get us? Because as far as I can tell, even when maga murders politicians in their homes the right will simply claim they were a secret liberal.
They'll just make shyt up and use it as justification to continue escalating political violence.
You know where this road leads? One side refusing to take a stand against absurdity and one side continuing to become more and more violent? Dark places. It leads to really, really fukking dark places.
Q: What do you say to people who are saying the Democrats need to lower the temperatures?
A: Oh please. Why don't you start with the president of the United States, right? and every ugly meme he has posted and every ugly word. Uh he is the leader of this nation. And I think that when he's posting things like he did just a couple of days ago, trying to show an entire city on fire and a reference to helicopters in in effect throwing people out of helicopters and showing himself as some kind of big chest beating uh uh uh threat. Uh then I just don't want to hear this from the Republicans.
She's right. As a leader it's Trump's job to lower tension in the wake of political violence, yet he continues to do the exact opposite.
And
Trump doubles down on blaming 'radical left' after vow to go after political violence
During an appearance on "Fox & Friends," Trump was asked about the presence of radical individuals on both sides of the aisle and how it can be fixed to bring the country together.
"Because we have radicals on the right as well. We have radicals on the left. People have gotten are watching all of these videos and cheering. Some people are cheering that Charlie was, was killed. How do we fix this country? How do we come back together?" co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked the president.
"I'll tell you something that's going to get me in trouble, but I couldn't care less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don't want to see crime. They don't want to see crime. Worried about the border. They're saying, We don't want these people coming in. We don't want you burning our shopping centers. We don't want you shooting our people in the middle of the street," Trump said.
"The radicals on the left are the problem," Trump continued, "and they're vicious and they're horrible and they're politically savvy, although they want men and women sports, they want transgender for everyone, they want open borders."
How the hell do we continue letting this one sided escalation keep going on unopposed? For the nay sayers, I'm not talking violence. I'm talking about how we need to stop cucking ourselves to a completely fictional narrative from people who don't live in any reality other than cult reality.
White Man Finally Understands Why His People Are Crashing Out About Being Exposed
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=OLRqtOMh4_g&hl=en-US
Channel Info Phillip Scott Podcast
Subscribers: 169K
Description
Welcome to the Phillip Scott Podcast – where we confront truth with clarity, boldness, and facts that mainstream media won’t touch. From global politics to Black empowerment, immigration, culture wars, and the power moves shaping our lives — we’re giving you unfiltered analysis from a seasoned voice you can trust.
Hosted by Phillip Scott, this platform brings sharp commentary, deep research, and unapologetic truth-telling that informs, challenges, and inspires.
Subscribe now and turn on notifications so you never miss the insight that keeps our people a step ahead.
Download the African Diaspora News Channel App on Google Play & the Apple App Store for exclusive content:
Stay informed. Stay empow
Transcripts
Show transcript
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=OLRqtOMh4_g&hl=en-US
Channel Info Phillip Scott Podcast
Subscribers: 169K
Description
Welcome to the Phillip Scott Podcast – where we confront truth with clarity, boldness, and facts that mainstream media won’t touch. From global politics to Black empowerment, immigration, culture wars, and the power moves shaping our lives — we’re giving you unfiltered analysis from a seasoned voice you can trust. Hosted by Phillip Scott, this platform brings sharp commentary, deep research, and unapologetic truth-telling that informs, challenges, and inspires. Subscribe now and turn on notifications so you never miss the insight that keeps our people a step ahead. Download the African Diaspora News Channel App on Google Play & the Apple App Store for exclusive content: Stay informed. Stay empowTranscripts
Show transcript
In the same breath canceling said free speech.
│
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
1/32
@TalbertSwan
Caucacity is spending eight years calling the nation’s first Black president, 'Barack the magic Negro,' ‘boy,’ and ‘tar baby,’ his wife a 'gorilla in heels,' because you have free speech…
…but now wanting to fire everyone who calls a deceased racist a racist.
2/32
@Kandiheart85
3/32
@KonnerKent5
Calling him racist isn't the same as celebrating and mocking his death. Do that and you deserve to get fired.
4/32
@FateMeetsLuck
When the time comes when we flee to other nations seeking refuge, may those other nations remember how we treated refugees and act accordingly. The world needs to move past tolerating cultural narcissism (white supremacy). Humanity survived without it long ago and will continue just fine in its absence.
5/32
@leslieruth1649
Lord have mercy.
6/32
@reijosh615
Also, this part:
[Quoted tweet]
Interesting to me that the first time I ever heard those terms used about him came from one of his supporters, right now while reading this.
I don't know where you heard that, but you *are* the one spreading it...
7/32
@41Adanac
"Caucacity"--Really creative word (and I love creative words; my first time seeing that one). Are there synonyms that apply to other races? (Asking for a racist friend.)
8/32
@WildbillPH
You're the only one who said those things. My dumb white ass voted for him, then I found out what a race baiter he was... So I left the Party!
9/32
@ChrisBurian30
@grok is there any evidence that Charlie Kirk ever said ANY of the things this poster is claiming? Yes or no.
10/32
@kriegroseTR
he couldn't have won without our "caucacity."
i didn't know of one person calling him those despicable names until i saw this post. good job.
11/32
@shytty61
It’s great to be MAGA white and entitled to free speech. The rest of us beware of losing job, for using free speech.
12/32
@RandomHvacGuy
You’re a racist
13/32
@sjwolosz123
White man invented that microphone and internet you spew shyt in
14/32
@Spiral_Descent
Obama had more white voters than black voters... By a LOT, just sayin'.
[Quoted tweet]
Caucacity is spending eight years calling the nation’s first Black president, 'Barack the magic Negro,' ‘boy,’ and ‘tar baby,’ his wife a 'gorilla in heels,' because you have free speech…
…but now wanting to fire everyone who calls a deceased racist a racist.
15/32
@jajcatsc1
That was Biden calling him that before he was elected.
16/32
@Marks33770Stroh
Biden described Obama as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
17/32
@j0glesby
I think this is a made up argument, but I am stealing your made up word “Caucacity” because it’s awesome! Consider it appropriated because I had the (wait for it) caucacity to do so. Really love it. Thanks!!!
18/32
@GDuker52004
[Quoted tweet]
Must watch
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968298010615463936/vid/avc1/720x1280/3Lm2HecEOo_DppnF.mp4
19/32
@NineteenNtyNin
Hooray for people in power having a ton of spine to cancel their political opponents, they should embrace this period in time to unload on their enemies, it’s been a long time coming.
20/32
@seeking_gamma81
Who do you talk to that says those types of things? You surround yourself with the wrong people.
21/32
@BurgessSales
Bishop - I lived deep in the south during those years. Those despicable words were never heard or spoken by my business associates, friends, family or myself. You've chosen to be a sad race baiter, it appears.... what seminary did you attend?
22/32
@deb_523
23/32
@legends1948
24/32
@andrewmartin003
Exactly!
25/32
@thawhole9
Like!!!! Make it make sense
26/32
@gmrunner13
Need receipts of anyone using those words.
27/32
@k_tiredagain
That’s what they do. Can’t get mad at a dog for barking. Gotta just move out of its way.
28/32
@DELTAEAGLE1MAGA
That’s nothing compared to what I said
29/32
@sisko2112
"Caucacity".... Yes. I like this word.
30/32
@Kentstrumentals
Bishop Sheard put out that statement of WEAKness and I just knew you wouldn’t disappoint. Thank you sir!
31/32
@85BLuna
Reading this and remembering how bad it was makes me feel so sick. The Obamas endured so much needless hatred and still do.
I hate the double standards of this country. I hate the hate. I’m just so tired of it.
32/32
@Greg64573290
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@TalbertSwan
Caucacity is spending eight years calling the nation’s first Black president, 'Barack the magic Negro,' ‘boy,’ and ‘tar baby,’ his wife a 'gorilla in heels,' because you have free speech…
…but now wanting to fire everyone who calls a deceased racist a racist.
2/32
@Kandiheart85
3/32
@KonnerKent5
Calling him racist isn't the same as celebrating and mocking his death. Do that and you deserve to get fired.
4/32
@FateMeetsLuck
When the time comes when we flee to other nations seeking refuge, may those other nations remember how we treated refugees and act accordingly. The world needs to move past tolerating cultural narcissism (white supremacy). Humanity survived without it long ago and will continue just fine in its absence.
5/32
@leslieruth1649
Lord have mercy.
6/32
@reijosh615
Also, this part:
[Quoted tweet]
Interesting to me that the first time I ever heard those terms used about him came from one of his supporters, right now while reading this.
I don't know where you heard that, but you *are* the one spreading it...
7/32
@41Adanac
"Caucacity"--Really creative word (and I love creative words; my first time seeing that one). Are there synonyms that apply to other races? (Asking for a racist friend.)
8/32
@WildbillPH
You're the only one who said those things. My dumb white ass voted for him, then I found out what a race baiter he was... So I left the Party!
9/32
@ChrisBurian30
@grok is there any evidence that Charlie Kirk ever said ANY of the things this poster is claiming? Yes or no.
10/32
@kriegroseTR
he couldn't have won without our "caucacity."
i didn't know of one person calling him those despicable names until i saw this post. good job.
11/32
@shytty61
It’s great to be MAGA white and entitled to free speech. The rest of us beware of losing job, for using free speech.
12/32
@RandomHvacGuy
You’re a racist
13/32
@sjwolosz123
White man invented that microphone and internet you spew shyt in
14/32
@Spiral_Descent
Obama had more white voters than black voters... By a LOT, just sayin'.
[Quoted tweet]
Caucacity is spending eight years calling the nation’s first Black president, 'Barack the magic Negro,' ‘boy,’ and ‘tar baby,’ his wife a 'gorilla in heels,' because you have free speech…
…but now wanting to fire everyone who calls a deceased racist a racist.
15/32
@jajcatsc1
That was Biden calling him that before he was elected.
16/32
@Marks33770Stroh
Biden described Obama as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
17/32
@j0glesby
I think this is a made up argument, but I am stealing your made up word “Caucacity” because it’s awesome! Consider it appropriated because I had the (wait for it) caucacity to do so. Really love it. Thanks!!!
18/32
@GDuker52004
[Quoted tweet]
Must watch
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968298010615463936/vid/avc1/720x1280/3Lm2HecEOo_DppnF.mp4
19/32
@NineteenNtyNin
Hooray for people in power having a ton of spine to cancel their political opponents, they should embrace this period in time to unload on their enemies, it’s been a long time coming.
20/32
@seeking_gamma81
Who do you talk to that says those types of things? You surround yourself with the wrong people.
21/32
@BurgessSales
Bishop - I lived deep in the south during those years. Those despicable words were never heard or spoken by my business associates, friends, family or myself. You've chosen to be a sad race baiter, it appears.... what seminary did you attend?
22/32
@deb_523
23/32
@legends1948
24/32
@andrewmartin003
Exactly!
25/32
@thawhole9
Like!!!! Make it make sense
26/32
@gmrunner13
Need receipts of anyone using those words.
27/32
@k_tiredagain
That’s what they do. Can’t get mad at a dog for barking. Gotta just move out of its way.
28/32
@DELTAEAGLE1MAGA
That’s nothing compared to what I said
29/32
@sisko2112
"Caucacity".... Yes. I like this word.
30/32
@Kentstrumentals
Bishop Sheard put out that statement of WEAKness and I just knew you wouldn’t disappoint. Thank you sir!
31/32
@85BLuna
Reading this and remembering how bad it was makes me feel so sick. The Obamas endured so much needless hatred and still do.
I hate the double standards of this country. I hate the hate. I’m just so tired of it.
32/32
@Greg64573290
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:12:39 2025 UTC
It’s crazy how coddled the right is by the media
It’s crazy how coddled the right is by the media
│
│
│ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:35:50 2025 UTC
│
│ I mean they own all of the major media.
│
│
│ I mean they own all of the major media.
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 13:51:58 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ But I’ve been told they’re the counter culture!
│ │
│ │
│ │ But I’ve been told they’re the counter culture!
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 14:15:52 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ They honestly believe they are true punk and it’s actually all the legit punk bands who have gone woke. Hell, I saw Neil Young a few weeks ago and white boomers around me were bytching about liberal propaganda and that Neil has been brainwashed.
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ They honestly believe they are true punk and it’s actually all the legit punk bands who have gone woke. Hell, I saw Neil Young a few weeks ago and white boomers around me were bytching about liberal propaganda and that Neil has been brainwashed.
│ │ │
Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:14:06 2025 UTC
Not just wanting to fire everyone who calls him out but THEN deciding to pass a Senate resolution calling for his birthday to be made a holiday. Celebrating the birthday of a racist who had the balls to be racist whilst simultaneously having upper case gums and lower-case teeth which I'm sure are signs of recessive traits.
Not just wanting to fire everyone who calls him out but THEN deciding to pass a Senate resolution calling for his birthday to be made a holiday. Celebrating the birthday of a racist who had the balls to be racist whilst simultaneously having upper case gums and lower-case teeth which I'm sure are signs of recessive traits.
│
│
│ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:28:48 2025 UTC
│
│ I am fukking LIVID that shyt got through. The logical part of me says to just ignore it and not give it even the slightest bit of attention because that’s the best way to protest it- just not acknowledge it.
│
│ But goddamn if it isn’t infuriating that not only are they treating that grifter like he’s some sort of martyr, now they’re forcing everyone else to do so as well. Part of me wants to actively speak out against it and be loud as fukk about it because where getting it a point where silence is quickly becoming support.
│
│
│ I am fukking LIVID that shyt got through. The logical part of me says to just ignore it and not give it even the slightest bit of attention because that’s the best way to protest it- just not acknowledge it.
│
│ But goddamn if it isn’t infuriating that not only are they treating that grifter like he’s some sort of martyr, now they’re forcing everyone else to do so as well. Part of me wants to actively speak out against it and be loud as fukk about it because where getting it a point where silence is quickly becoming support.
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:32:33 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ I keep quoting charlie back at people. they dont like it for some reason. /s/ I found this to be the best way to show people that he was what he said he was
│ │
│ │
│ │ I keep quoting charlie back at people. they dont like it for some reason. /s/ I found this to be the best way to show people that he was what he said he was
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:39:28 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Oh they hate it and immediately start tripping over themselves trying to argue how it’s taken out of context, acting like somehow adding context to the shyt things he said makes them better.
│ │ │
│ │ │ “He said black people are worthless.”
│ │ │
│ │ │ “Um actually he said black people are worthless because they all waste their potential. What he actually meant is that blacks have a lot of potential so see he’s not racist! A watched a black conservative on YouTube say so. What you’re doing is evil taking his words out of context like that!”
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Oh they hate it and immediately start tripping over themselves trying to argue how it’s taken out of context, acting like somehow adding context to the shyt things he said makes them better.
│ │ │
│ │ │ “He said black people are worthless.”
│ │ │
│ │ │ “Um actually he said black people are worthless because they all waste their potential. What he actually meant is that blacks have a lot of potential so see he’s not racist! A watched a black conservative on YouTube say so. What you’re doing is evil taking his words out of context like that!”
│ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 13:24:57 2025 UTC
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ omg yes that and then I ask them if what I said would have landed me in HR or fired "yes of course" they say. So why should I honor him? I get nothing but blank stares back
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ omg yes that and then I ask them if what I said would have landed me in HR or fired "yes of course" they say. So why should I honor him? I get nothing but blank stares back
│ │ │ │
Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:19:06 2025 UTC
fukk any employer who fires an employee for that shyt.
On another note, since they are doing this dumb shyt, liberals need to respond in kind and start doing the same thing to them when they post racist shyt
Start contacting employers on these people
fukk any employer who fires an employee for that shyt.
On another note, since they are doing this dumb shyt, liberals need to respond in kind and start doing the same thing to them when they post racist shyt
Start contacting employers on these people
│
│
│ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:24:27 2025 UTC
│
│ Plus name & shame the companies. It's fantastic that ABC, Disney, Nexstar et al are catching hell for the Kimmel situation, but let's keep that same energy for the not famous people who get fired. Put all those companies on blast.
│
│
│ Plus name & shame the companies. It's fantastic that ABC, Disney, Nexstar et al are catching hell for the Kimmel situation, but let's keep that same energy for the not famous people who get fired. Put all those companies on blast.
│
│ │
│ │
│ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:30:33 2025 UTC
│ │
│ │ Exactly!!!!
│ │
│ │
│ │ Exactly!!!!
│ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Commented on Fri Sep 19 12:35:33 2025 UTC
│ │ │
│ │ │ Right! Jimmy Kimmel was not the only person to get fired recently.
│ │ │
│ │ │ https://i.redd.it/bxy97kdo94qf1.jpeg
│ │ │
│ │ │ This is from a fukking congressman!
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │
│ │ │ Right! Jimmy Kimmel was not the only person to get fired recently.
│ │ │
│ │ │ https://i.redd.it/bxy97kdo94qf1.jpeg
│ │ │
│ │ │ This is from a fukking congressman!
│ │ │
│ │ │
1/37
@BulwarkOnline
MacCallum: "Charlie said, 'There is no such thing as hate speech.'"
Trump: "He might not be saying that now."
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968762333372555264/vid/avc1/1920x1080/ZiW3RD7bHLrFfHBn.mp4
2/37
@DissidentMedia
The implication here is that Charlie would recognize his own speech as hate speech? Maybe think about what you’re saying instead of constantly reaching for one-liners and you might not accidentally denigrate a dead man.
3/37
@PawlowskiMario
Wut?
4/37
@Animalsdaily6
The reason why he's not saying by now
5/37
@Momyoffour4
Yes, he would. Don't be ridiculous
6/37
@Patrickkerby58
So sad that Trump doesn’t know Charlie Kirk.
7/37
@M_A_N_ofLetters
He's highkey hilarious.
8/37
@A_V_West
Then Trump didn't know Charlie Kirk that well.
9/37
@Nljigakulive
Lmao proof that they don’t even care about the dude or his ideas they just found a catalyst to enact their fascist agenda and move towards authoritarianism. Half of the people crying about being outraged hated the dude.
10/37
@wokegoldenboy
11/37
@KommonOrigin
Pretty bad.
Pretty bad.
But what other option do we have?
12/37
@PauletteAlt
Under our Constitution there is not. Charlie never changed his mind on that. STOP debasing his memory.
13/37
@gabrielangel411
Face, meet palm.
14/37
@mo65564605
How does he think charlie would say it with an extra hole in his neck? Charlie is having hard enough time trying to convince Satan that he doesn't belong there.
15/37
@ClarkFocht
"Hate Speech" is the language of @NicolasMaduro or @RTErdogan or /search?q=#VladimirPutin or @netanyahu or @Keir_Starmer this list goes on speaking about their political opponents.
Heck /search?q=#kimjongun could talk such excrement.
16/37
@lezbrahh
why is he not being canceled??
17/37
@edisonj_3
Lmaooooo whaaaaaat
18/37
@WeSee2024
Lmaooooo!! Trump is mocking Charlie Kirk lol
19/37
@TheDecadentLife
They do not care about this man.
20/37
@el_xaber
21/37
@VNZWORLD
At this point I don’t think he’s saying anything
22/37
@maxtoscano1
??????????????!
Ta-Nehisi Coates basically just wrote an essay excoriating Kirk and was way more sensitive to his death than this.
This is WILD
23/37
@wwaytooyoung
I hate that he’s so unintentionally funny.
24/37
@snackvampire
gotta add him to that website now I guess
25/37
@billsbyabill
26/37
@TedWilcox7
such a warm, compassionate man...
27/37
@Project_BTL
this dude bro
28/37
@thatjenmonroe
I heard lying about Kirk is a fireable offense
29/37
@Maximill15
30/37
@cellarSQUIDc
FREEDOM is the ability to tell ppl the truth no matter who it bums out.
31/37
@crazy_stephen_i
Holy shyt
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968806417290170368/vid/avc1/1280x720/oScw3F4ZlXCMOm5b.mp4
32/37
@RealAngryAlaska
I know one thing Charlie would be saying now more than ever.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968892481078222848/vid/avc1/1920x1080/ZLkUxk4cAE0cBBYb.mp4
33/37
@jdlyonsKY
What are they going to make Kirk's ghost say next?
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968822498750763008/vid/avc1/1020x1498/eCt_RpA84qnL1xBD.mp4
34/37
@AIQuestDaily
@grok ? explain this talk
35/37
@n1ghtkitten
even trump is memeing on this losers grave give it up maga tards
36/37
@anointeligente
He would definitely be saying that now
37/37
@RonStoneman7
So by Trumps logic Charlie would also change his stance on the acceptability of gun deaths to keep the 2A safe?
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@BulwarkOnline
MacCallum: "Charlie said, 'There is no such thing as hate speech.'"
Trump: "He might not be saying that now."
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968762333372555264/vid/avc1/1920x1080/ZiW3RD7bHLrFfHBn.mp4
2/37
@DissidentMedia
The implication here is that Charlie would recognize his own speech as hate speech? Maybe think about what you’re saying instead of constantly reaching for one-liners and you might not accidentally denigrate a dead man.
3/37
@PawlowskiMario
Wut?
4/37
@Animalsdaily6
The reason why he's not saying by now
5/37
@Momyoffour4
Yes, he would. Don't be ridiculous
6/37
@Patrickkerby58
So sad that Trump doesn’t know Charlie Kirk.
7/37
@M_A_N_ofLetters
He's highkey hilarious.
8/37
@A_V_West
Then Trump didn't know Charlie Kirk that well.
9/37
@Nljigakulive
Lmao proof that they don’t even care about the dude or his ideas they just found a catalyst to enact their fascist agenda and move towards authoritarianism. Half of the people crying about being outraged hated the dude.
10/37
@wokegoldenboy
11/37
@KommonOrigin
Pretty bad.
Pretty bad.
But what other option do we have?
12/37
@PauletteAlt
Under our Constitution there is not. Charlie never changed his mind on that. STOP debasing his memory.
13/37
@gabrielangel411
Face, meet palm.
14/37
@mo65564605
How does he think charlie would say it with an extra hole in his neck? Charlie is having hard enough time trying to convince Satan that he doesn't belong there.
15/37
@ClarkFocht
"Hate Speech" is the language of @NicolasMaduro or @RTErdogan or /search?q=#VladimirPutin or @netanyahu or @Keir_Starmer this list goes on speaking about their political opponents.
Heck /search?q=#kimjongun could talk such excrement.
16/37
@lezbrahh
why is he not being canceled??
17/37
@edisonj_3
Lmaooooo whaaaaaat
18/37
@WeSee2024
Lmaooooo!! Trump is mocking Charlie Kirk lol
19/37
@TheDecadentLife
They do not care about this man.
20/37
@el_xaber
21/37
@VNZWORLD
At this point I don’t think he’s saying anything
22/37
@maxtoscano1
??????????????!
Ta-Nehisi Coates basically just wrote an essay excoriating Kirk and was way more sensitive to his death than this.
This is WILD
23/37
@wwaytooyoung
I hate that he’s so unintentionally funny.
24/37
@snackvampire
gotta add him to that website now I guess
25/37
@billsbyabill
26/37
@TedWilcox7
such a warm, compassionate man...
27/37
@Project_BTL
this dude bro
28/37
@thatjenmonroe
I heard lying about Kirk is a fireable offense
29/37
@Maximill15
30/37
@cellarSQUIDc
FREEDOM is the ability to tell ppl the truth no matter who it bums out.
31/37
@crazy_stephen_i
Holy shyt
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968806417290170368/vid/avc1/1280x720/oScw3F4ZlXCMOm5b.mp4
32/37
@RealAngryAlaska
I know one thing Charlie would be saying now more than ever.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968892481078222848/vid/avc1/1920x1080/ZLkUxk4cAE0cBBYb.mp4
33/37
@jdlyonsKY
What are they going to make Kirk's ghost say next?
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1968822498750763008/vid/avc1/1020x1498/eCt_RpA84qnL1xBD.mp4
34/37
@AIQuestDaily
@grok ? explain this talk
35/37
@n1ghtkitten
even trump is memeing on this losers grave give it up maga tards
36/37
@anointeligente
He would definitely be saying that now
37/37
@RonStoneman7
So by Trumps logic Charlie would also change his stance on the acceptability of gun deaths to keep the 2A safe?
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
The cacs assassinated this faggit to spark their agenda. They are using this Kirk figure as some sort of martyr for their bullshyt cause
This fukking government is so shady and will kill anyone to further their agenda.
This fukking government is so shady and will kill anyone to further their agenda.
Brave white men expose the racist white male culture and criminality in America.
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=6g8zqPPzMiw
Channel Info Afro Think Tank futurism.
Subscribers: 14.1K
Description
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=6g8zqPPzMiw
Channel Info Afro Think Tank futurism.
Subscribers: 14.1K
Description
substack.com/@afrothinktank?utm_source=share&utm_m…
www.patreon.com/AfroThinkTank?utm_campaign=creator…
www.paypal.me/taurus2002ac
buy.stripe.com/4gM00j3bkeuV0C17GT93y00
cash.app/afrothinktank
Transcripts
Show transcript
www.patreon.com/AfroThinkTank?utm_campaign=creator…
www.paypal.me/taurus2002ac
buy.stripe.com/4gM00j3bkeuV0C17GT93y00
cash.app/afrothinktank
Transcripts
Show transcript
[Social Media] *votes trump anyways*
1/37
@RichardHanania
Erika: Find Jesus. Forgive your enemies.
<crowd cheers>
Trump, following the widow, giving the keynote: No, I’m overruling Christianity, don’t forgive your enemies and hate them.
<crowd cheers>
What a perfect encapsulation of the entire MAGA movement.
2/37
@RichardHanania
Join me with Michael Tracey at 845 ET tonight for our exclusive funeral review. You can set a reminder for the livestream here. Charlie Kirk Memorial: Christian Revival Sweeping America?
3/37
@RichardHanania
Michael Tracey and I review the memorial service here. Christian Nationalism Rising
4/37
@MoogRogue
Forgiveness for some, vengeance for others…?
5/37
@ManiamAkash
Exactly
6/37
@GusLangenschmid
“Denominational differences”
7/37
@loymershimer
Everyone needs to understand the difference between the Church & State in Christian doctrine. The Church bears the Word — and forgoes the Sword. The State bears the Sword against evil, informed by the Word (via the Church). As members of the Church we do not live by the Sword, but as agents & officers of State, we bear the Sword: we “terminate bad guys with extreme prejudice” (to quote a Marine saying).
The Bible is full of this understanding, if people would just read it.
Psalm 3:7 — “Arise, LORD!
Deliver me, my God!
Strike all my enemies on the jaw;
break the teeth of the wicked.”
Psalm 139:19-22 — “Oh, that You would slay the wicked, O God! Depart from me, therefore, you bloodthirsty men. For they speak against You wickedly; Your enemies take Your name in vain.
“Do I not hate them, O Lord, who hate You? And do I not loathe those who rise up against You? I hate them with perfect hatred; I count them my enemies.”
Never forget when President Trump wrote those verses… oh wait! That wasn’t President Trump — that was God’s anointed king for His ancient people: Holy Scripture.
President Trump speaking as a leader of State is supposed to have a different emphasis, and we should expect him to sound different — emphasizing judgment on evil vs. the forgiveness of it.
8/37
@CatImcat
I thought you wanted a separation of church and state?
9/37
@MartianSurveyor
Maybe try reading a Bible instead of pointing out perceived inconsistencies you don't understand.
10/37
@Aurondarklord
She, representing faith, did what faith commands.
Trump, representing secular law, did what justice commands.
11/37
@Matt_VanDyke
Religious Christians follow the first.
Cultural Christians follow the second.
12/37
@planetbrady
Forgiveness requires accountability.
13/37
@AxelJimet
Yup.
14/37
@GirkeHanjo
To err is human
15/37
@MacBeastyAMC
give to Caesar that which is Caesars
16/37
@DBCrypt0
What an unbelievably ridiculous paraphrase
So much hate in you
17/37
@InevitableOwl
That isn’t what he said
18/37
@djrizz13
I’ll bet you hated both approaches though
19/37
@BookEmperor
Go get another booster.
20/37
@1amIan
Sometimes you need to trade your cloak for a sword.
21/37
@ZacksJerryRig
Yup.
22/37
@meatheadmusings
Render unto Caesar!
23/37
@jchasedavis
I get the feeling that you’re not a Christian, so I realize all of this must be very confusing for you. You see, we Christians have a long tradition of distinguishing between private and public enemies. Erika was forgiving her private enemy. Good. Trump is operating as God’s avenger against a public enemy, a la Romans 13. Also good.
I’d recommend you do some reading on these ideas in order to familiarize yourself with the new reality you are living in.
24/37
@MattyBoySwag143
There’s no contradiction there, but you’re soulless so you don’t understand
25/37
@KINGTRUMPUSLIAR
Imagine if the kllr
WAS BLACK
26/37
@badazn
You’re a demon
27/37
@BadBhodie
The point is y’all killed and canceled the best of us. Unfortunate for the left, we aren’t as good as Charlie was.
28/37
@LandoBerando
*different people with different strengths say different things and people cheer on their authenticity*
Richard: “tHiS iS mAgA.”
29/37
@Rhenderson23
Nah, he actually stopped and said Charlie wouldn’t want that.
30/37
@LionBlogosphere
It's a very low-IQ movement, the opposite of elite human capital, for sure.
31/37
@Dynamoniusrex
Well they didn’t cheer, they laughed because Trump was trying to make it sound like a joke evidenced by the way he giggled (though I don’t think he was joking if I’m being honest) but the crowd didn’t cheer it on. Also, there were 60k in attendance. You do know that 1 half of a crowd could cheer at something while the other half stays silent and it still sounds like cheering right? You can’t label the entire swath of people in attendance and say they are all being hypocrites…. Oh good grief why do I even bother. Carry on.
32/37
@johnniechad
Unbelievable
33/37
@nihalthotaa
It's wild how crowds cheer for completely opposing messages. Shows how tribal politics has become.
34/37
@PatriotVerity
That's not at all what was said. He said I'm sorry but I hate my enemies. He's human. He also said we probably should be more like Erika and Charlie. So stop lying.
35/37
@turnerwestvan
And people cheered
36/37
@realDavidMaze
It’s not an easy task to forgive evil
37/37
@Kathe56Kat
And Monday morning he is signing an executive order to make it the law..
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@RichardHanania
Erika: Find Jesus. Forgive your enemies.
<crowd cheers>
Trump, following the widow, giving the keynote: No, I’m overruling Christianity, don’t forgive your enemies and hate them.
<crowd cheers>
What a perfect encapsulation of the entire MAGA movement.
2/37
@RichardHanania
Join me with Michael Tracey at 845 ET tonight for our exclusive funeral review. You can set a reminder for the livestream here. Charlie Kirk Memorial: Christian Revival Sweeping America?
3/37
@RichardHanania
Michael Tracey and I review the memorial service here. Christian Nationalism Rising
4/37
@MoogRogue
Forgiveness for some, vengeance for others…?
5/37
@ManiamAkash
Exactly
6/37
@GusLangenschmid
“Denominational differences”
7/37
@loymershimer
Everyone needs to understand the difference between the Church & State in Christian doctrine. The Church bears the Word — and forgoes the Sword. The State bears the Sword against evil, informed by the Word (via the Church). As members of the Church we do not live by the Sword, but as agents & officers of State, we bear the Sword: we “terminate bad guys with extreme prejudice” (to quote a Marine saying).
The Bible is full of this understanding, if people would just read it.
Psalm 3:7 — “Arise, LORD!
Deliver me, my God!
Strike all my enemies on the jaw;
break the teeth of the wicked.”
Psalm 139:19-22 — “Oh, that You would slay the wicked, O God! Depart from me, therefore, you bloodthirsty men. For they speak against You wickedly; Your enemies take Your name in vain.
“Do I not hate them, O Lord, who hate You? And do I not loathe those who rise up against You? I hate them with perfect hatred; I count them my enemies.”
Never forget when President Trump wrote those verses… oh wait! That wasn’t President Trump — that was God’s anointed king for His ancient people: Holy Scripture.
President Trump speaking as a leader of State is supposed to have a different emphasis, and we should expect him to sound different — emphasizing judgment on evil vs. the forgiveness of it.
8/37
@CatImcat
I thought you wanted a separation of church and state?
9/37
@MartianSurveyor
Maybe try reading a Bible instead of pointing out perceived inconsistencies you don't understand.
10/37
@Aurondarklord
She, representing faith, did what faith commands.
Trump, representing secular law, did what justice commands.
11/37
@Matt_VanDyke
Religious Christians follow the first.
Cultural Christians follow the second.
12/37
@planetbrady
Forgiveness requires accountability.
13/37
@AxelJimet
Yup.
14/37
@GirkeHanjo
To err is human
15/37
@MacBeastyAMC
give to Caesar that which is Caesars
16/37
@DBCrypt0
What an unbelievably ridiculous paraphrase
So much hate in you
17/37
@InevitableOwl
That isn’t what he said
18/37
@djrizz13
I’ll bet you hated both approaches though
19/37
@BookEmperor
Go get another booster.
20/37
@1amIan
Sometimes you need to trade your cloak for a sword.
21/37
@ZacksJerryRig
Yup.
22/37
@meatheadmusings
Render unto Caesar!
23/37
@jchasedavis
I get the feeling that you’re not a Christian, so I realize all of this must be very confusing for you. You see, we Christians have a long tradition of distinguishing between private and public enemies. Erika was forgiving her private enemy. Good. Trump is operating as God’s avenger against a public enemy, a la Romans 13. Also good.
I’d recommend you do some reading on these ideas in order to familiarize yourself with the new reality you are living in.
24/37
@MattyBoySwag143
There’s no contradiction there, but you’re soulless so you don’t understand
25/37
@KINGTRUMPUSLIAR
Imagine if the kllr
WAS BLACK
26/37
@badazn
You’re a demon
27/37
@BadBhodie
The point is y’all killed and canceled the best of us. Unfortunate for the left, we aren’t as good as Charlie was.
28/37
@LandoBerando
*different people with different strengths say different things and people cheer on their authenticity*
Richard: “tHiS iS mAgA.”
29/37
@Rhenderson23
Nah, he actually stopped and said Charlie wouldn’t want that.
30/37
@LionBlogosphere
It's a very low-IQ movement, the opposite of elite human capital, for sure.
31/37
@Dynamoniusrex
Well they didn’t cheer, they laughed because Trump was trying to make it sound like a joke evidenced by the way he giggled (though I don’t think he was joking if I’m being honest) but the crowd didn’t cheer it on. Also, there were 60k in attendance. You do know that 1 half of a crowd could cheer at something while the other half stays silent and it still sounds like cheering right? You can’t label the entire swath of people in attendance and say they are all being hypocrites…. Oh good grief why do I even bother. Carry on.
32/37
@johnniechad
Unbelievable
33/37
@nihalthotaa
It's wild how crowds cheer for completely opposing messages. Shows how tribal politics has become.
34/37
@PatriotVerity
That's not at all what was said. He said I'm sorry but I hate my enemies. He's human. He also said we probably should be more like Erika and Charlie. So stop lying.
35/37
@turnerwestvan
And people cheered
36/37
@realDavidMaze
It’s not an easy task to forgive evil
37/37
@Kathe56Kat
And Monday morning he is signing an executive order to make it the law..
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Similar threads
