Considering this country was founded by the religious, I don't get where it's such a travesty that Chik FilA is pushing biblical principles. Why don't we have gay marriage already? Because this country was founded on religious principles.
So it's okay for gays to push to have their activities plastered everywhere and to force everyone to act like they are either indifferent or to act like they better enjoy the issue or they are some kind of bigot, but it's not alright to not like homosexuality? Marriage is TRADITIONALLY defined as between a man and a woman. What is wrong for Chik FilA for standing behind that? They are not promoting beating up gays, they are not denying them jobs, nor are they preventing them from eating at their restaurants... so I would like to see how that is in ANY way comparable to what blacks experienced. Funny liberals have a problem with that, but have no problem buying Apple products who use those Chinese sweatshops where there are virtually NO human rights... where it can get so bad at those factories that they have to install suicide nets. That ain't important though.
like murder and robbery? last I checked those were the first two commandments on what NOT to do.thou shalt not covetlike murder and robbery? last I checked those were the first two commandments on what NOT to do.

If you can't spell simple words like "hurdle", I don't see why you would expect anyone to take life lessons from you...if you can't even get over this obvious hurtle, i find it hard to believe you'll tackle the issues of sweatshops, nor the issues of human rights...
If you can't spell simple words like "hurdle", I don't see why you would expect anyone to take life lessons from you...
when you're answering 10 different responses back to back, i think i'd be allowed to slip up on my spelling at least once...

First they came for the communists but I didnt speak up because I wasnt a communist.to be honest, it's issues like this that make me feel like you guys really have no real arguments towards anything, only preferences shaped by your personal experiences, not by any deep thought or personal searches on the subject. and i'm not saying there's anything wrong with that (even though i wouldn't recommend being like that) but you could be a little more real with yourselves about the whole thing...
i don't own a car so i don't buy gasoline. try again, i'm sure if you try hard enough, you'll find fault with me but not before you examine your own...
i don't own a car so i don't buy gasoline. try again, i'm sure if you try hard enough, you'll find fault with me but not before you examine your own...
Oil and it's by products are used for far more than gas......

no it isn't. there are similar elements. it's stupid to pretend that there are no similarities, especially when i just highlighted the goddamn similarity between the group. all i'm saying is, when it comes to something so simple like not eating at a store, people are like "fukk that, i love that chicken". and i'm trying to figure out why people feel that way considering the evidence.
honestly, i don't even want to discuss anything with you. you're just a troll anyways. i can't take anything you say seriously anymore...
