I hate myself for saying this, but it's fun to watch
I wanna argue the other side for the sake of debate, but these counter arguments for god are just too out there
Christians create the annoying atheists that they hate so much.
- Thread starter semtex
- Start date
I wanna argue the other side for the sake of debate, but these counter arguments for god are just too out there
Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
This post means absolutely nothing to me. Would you care to elaborate? In your own words, not with some corny diagram you found on google?
Like I told you before you're not intelligent, you just remember and regurgitate well. That doesn't speak to problem solving and critical thinking, which is where I challenge you again and again. Your weak arguments may fluster an unlearned man but I'm a different animal, friend.
You said I was wrong. Prove your claim...
As a software developer I tend to favor the simulation theoryI believe in God but I'm not a Christian. I don't believe Jesus is the son of God or a part of God or any of that. I believe Christianity as it's practiced today is a form idolatry.
But you comparing God to a unicorn tells me you don't have the basics. But you say you came from a Christian family so I can understand how you're perception has been warped. You were taught God was a man. I'd be confused by that too.
oh man. I need some better methods though 
Dude.
What.
The
fukk?
I don't give a fukk what dawkins says, cause what dawkins says doesn't carry any more weight than anything else just because he says it.
What matters is the argument itself.
I am 100% in agreeeance with Dawkins. We can NOT ever be sure because you can never assert a negative claim.
appeal to authority
Prove what claim?
I can't disprove your god...and I can't disprove any gods.
I can't DISPROVE anything.
I CAN however prove that things once asserted as foundations for belief in gods have been incorrectly levied AND are in fact wrong.
The "god" ground is getting smaller...
Does that disprove god? No.
thegreatest
Pro
It's impossible to know anything for sure. I believe, just like everyone else in this thread and the world. I don't claim to know.
debating shouldn't really be this easy.I hate myself for saying this, but it's fun to watch
I wanna argue the other side for the sake of debate, but these counter arguments for god are just too out there
Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
I didn't ask you to disprove anything.
You made a claim that I was wrong. I asked you to prove that. Prove that I'm wrong. If what you say is infallibly true, then you should have no problem proving it. Otherwise, you owe me an apology.
The rest of the nonsense you typed I don't agree with at all. Not just because I don't agree, but you also provided nothing for me to even ponder over.
You told me what you CAN prove, but then proceeded to prove nothing. I asked you to prove something, and you didn't prove that either.
So basically, it's safe to say that you're just wasting my time here.
Looking at the facts of our universe through the eyes of science. Such as how this world is so finely tuned for us, the specifics of gravity between protons and electrons. So many parts of science that lead to intelligent design.
Keep showing your lack of knowledge. When Dawkins speaks such as his book on the god delusion millions listen. He did assert a negative claim from his current position as Professor at Oxford. The upper, upper echelon of higher learning.
Nah, even Dawkins says he doesn't know if god exists or not.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ist-Richard-Dawkins-admits-fact-agnostic.html
Plus, Dawkins isn't the spokesperson for all atheists.
FrederickDouglas
All Star
The criteria for being an atheist isn't whether you believe in God or not...it's whether or not you agree with Richard Dawkins?
I didn't ask you to disprove anything.
You made a claim that I was wrong. I asked you to prove that. Prove that I'm wrong. If what you say is infallibly true, then you should have no problem proving it. Otherwise, you owe me an apology.
The rest of the nonsense you typed I don't agree with at all. Not just because I don't agree, but you also provided nothing for me to even ponder over.
You told me what you CAN prove, but then proceeded to prove nothing. I asked you to prove something, and you didn't prove that either.
So basically, it's safe to say that you're just wasting my time here.
You are wasting everyone's fukking time in this thread. At least the other idiots try to come up with counterarguments to justify their silly beliefs to themselves. You are the fukking manifestation of willful ignorance. You can't even grasp simple concepts, such as burden of proof, and every subsequent post of yours highlights your stupidity.
If there was a loving god, people like you wouldn't exist.
Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
You are wasting everyone's fukking time in this thread. At least the other idiots try to come up with counterarguments to justify their silly beliefs to themselves. You are the fukking manifestation of willful ignorance. You can't even grasp simple concepts, such as burden of proof, and every subsequent post of yours highlights your stupidity.
If there was a loving god, people like you wouldn't exist.
Let me first say:
Burden of proof? Prove what when I've made no claim.
Counterargument? Counter what argument when all he said was I was wrong.
Simple concepts? What simple concepts would those be? Or is that more nonsense you pulled outta your rectum?
And let me finish by saying:
The criteria for being an atheist isn't whether you believe in God or not...it's whether or not you agree with Richard Dawkins?
The criteria for being an atheist is the definition not Dawkins. He just embodies it to the point millions look to him for atheistic knowledge.