Cillian Murphy Stimulus | 28 Years Later Discussion | Directed by Danny Boy

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
40,725
Reputation
6,344
Daps
133,634
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
The third act was pretty bad (I will admit) but I always hated the 3rd act of the original movie as well. Overall though? I was impressed.... But that ending in this current film? Nah.....
Is it just an ending that provides no closure or is it a ridiculous kind of ending where you scratch your head and question what were they thinking?
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,258
Reputation
13,431
Daps
212,031
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
This film was all over the place. Felt like a bunch of interesting ideas strung together. The world building here is weak and raises more questions than it answers. I really enjoyed the first hour, great tension and great camera work. But then it got weird and I just didn’t buy many of the decisions that the characters made, which took me out of the movie. I also did not like the stylistic direction Boyle took with the kills and inter mixing of old images and film within new scenes. Again those things took me out of the movie because they felt too heavy handed. And the last two minutes were ridiculous, but it did make me laugh so I guess that’s something. Really disappointed though overall. 5/10
Damn. So I should just wait for it to hit FX now :mjcry: yall ripping this to shreds I thought Danny did it again :mjcry:
 

summwunn

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,698
Reputation
1,033
Daps
7,235
Is it just an ending that provides no closure or is it a ridiculous kind of ending where you scratch your head and question what were they thinking?

...... the ending is not a cliffhanger . . . it just feels like a scene from a completely different movie / genre . . . kills the vibe that was established up to that point . .
 

Doctor Doom

Rest in peace, Akira Toriyama
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
15,416
Reputation
3,085
Daps
46,250
Reppin
Latveria
Im supposed to see this tonite but seeing a lot of people saying the 3rd act is wack. :snoop:

I think ima wait till hits the streams. Idk. Gonna be a game time decision.

I think you see it on streams and form the opinion off that.

Spending money on the ticket + possible food and drink? You might piss yourself off. :francis:
 

Black Excellence

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
2,242
Reputation
1,022
Daps
9,832
This film was all over the place. Felt like a bunch of interesting ideas strung together. The world building here is weak and raises more questions than it answers. I really enjoyed the first hour, great tension and great camera work. But then it got weird and I just didn’t buy many of the decisions that the characters made, which took me out of the movie. I also did not like the stylistic direction Boyle took with the kills and inter mixing of old images and film within new scenes. Again those things took me out of the movie because they felt too heavy handed. And the last two minutes were ridiculous, but it did make me laugh so I guess that’s something. Really disappointed though overall. 5/10
I agree with some of those nitpicks I will say tho that doesn’t necessarily make it a bad film because you disagree with the creative direction. Objectively the only thing bad was
the sudden & convenient inclusion of the soldiers, the tonal shift of the ending and the CGI in the water
when they were trying to get back home.
 

FlyRy

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
31,811
Reputation
3,665
Daps
65,289
it's interesting to me this is so divisive. did people forget the ending to the original film? i didn't like it back then. it switched to real cameras after the blurriness and became a completely different film with the army storyline.

i fukked with it, but that last scene felt like nia dacosta directed it. she makes bad movies so she might flop the franchise so bad with the 2nd one that we don't get the third one that's supposed to be directed by danny boyle.


 
Top