Clippers Hire Ty Lue

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,657
Reputation
1,390
Daps
61,155
This is same hire that the Nets did, basically hiring a buddy for their star players to keep them happy.
If by "the same" you mean Lue has 211x the experience as a NBA regular season head coach 61x the experience as a NBA playoff head coach and 100% more championship wins than Nash ... then yes ... you would be correct "its the same" :ehh:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,143
Reppin
the ether
Only one team can win per year ... Those 4 superstar players alone account for 11 out of the last 20 championships.... 11 of the last 20 championship were cashed in by 4 main superstars man ... that number is staggering


Take the superstars away from those coaches and they're no longer champions ... coaches are important for certain things but don't touch the value of a superstar :yeshrug:
Phil Jackson, Greg Popovich, and Pat Riley, just THREE coaches, accounted for 19 out of 26 championships at one point....if we're going by "staggering numbers", that number is a lot more staggering, no? :sas1::sas2:

And 3 of the 7 titles they didn't win were won by Chuck Daly and Larry Brown, who are legends in their own right. :yeshrug:

You need a complete team to win a title. And one part of a complete team is being well-coached. A great coach can't win by himself, but unless you have a transcendent player-coach leading your team or an overwhelming talent advantage, then you're not going to win a title without an above-average coach. "Average" coaches ain't gonna get it done.
 

theflyest

Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
29,303
Reputation
1,813
Daps
73,768
Reppin
NULL
SHOULDA TOOK THAT
CAVS GM POSITION.


HES HUSTLING BACKWARDS.
:devil:
:evil:

when you have that type of financial security he has, he can do what he wants. He doesn’t need to follow the traditional career path.

You can tell by the way he moves that he’s trying to avoid being in a fukked up position, which is important for a black man.

Plus it’s obvious these nyggas talk to each other. You don’t think he asked Lue or anyone else about that job? Lue probably told him hell nah you don’t want to be there
 
Last edited:

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,657
Reputation
1,390
Daps
61,155
Phil Jackson, Greg Popovich, and Pat Riley, just THREE coaches, accounted for 19 out of 26 championships at one point....if we're going by "staggering numbers", that number is a lot more staggering, no? :sas1::sas2:
Like I Said ...Which one of those didn't have a superstar player on their roster :francis:




And 3 of the 7 titles they didn't win were won by Chuck Daly and Larry Brown, who are legends in their own right. :yeshrug:
Which one of those didn't have a superstar on their roster :francis:



You need a complete team to win a title. And one part of a complete team is being well-coached. A great coach can't win by himself, but unless you have a transcendent player-coach leading your team or an overwhelming talent advantage, then you're not going to win a title without an above-average coach. "Average" coaches ain't gonna get it done.
The only reason people like yourself even hold certain coaches in high esteem in the first place is overwhelmingly due to the superstar talent they had access to during their durations with the teams you mentioned .... :francis:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
68,685
Reputation
14,392
Daps
427,327
Reppin
CHICAGO
when you have that type of financial security he has, he can do what he wants. He doesn’t need to follow the traditional career path.

You can tell by the way he moves that he’s trying to avoid being in a fukked up position, which is important for a black man.

Plus it’s obvious these nyggas talk to each other. You don’t think he asked Lue or anyone else about that job? Lue probably told him hell nah you don’t want to be there
LUE WAS STILL HEAD COACH
WHEN HE TURNED THE JOB DOWN
AND BRON BRON/CAVS HAD 1 MORE
FINALS RUN IN THEM.


HE COULD HAVE COME IN
AND MADE THE KYRIE TRADE HIMSELF
TO SET THE TEAM UP FOR THE FUTURE.
:devil:
:evil:
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
75,906
Reputation
18,855
Daps
318,288
Tye Lue with Chauncey as an assistant

Love it!!!!! :mjgrin:


2 COMPETENT coaches for the Clippers
 

theflyest

Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
29,303
Reputation
1,813
Daps
73,768
Reppin
NULL
LUE WAS STILL HEAD COACH
WHEN HE TURNED THE JOB DOWN
AND BRON BRON/CAVS HAD 1 MORE
FINALS RUN IN THEM.


HE COULD HAVE COME IN
AND MADE THE KYRIE TRADE HIMSELF
TO SET THE TEAM UP FOR THE FUTURE.
:devil:
:evil:

Chauncy and Lue are actually friends. I think it’s logical to believe that he did his homework before turning down the job. This is a guy that earned over 100M in his playing career, plus he worked at ESPN at the time. If he wasn’t 100 percent comfortable with the situation, why would he take the job?:mjlol:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
68,685
Reputation
14,392
Daps
427,327
Reppin
CHICAGO
Chauncy and Lue are actually friends. I think it’s logical to believe that he did his homework before turning down the job. This is a guy that earned over 100M in his playing career, plus he worked at ESPN at the time. If he wasn’t 100 percent comfortable with the situation, why would he take the job?:mjlol:
BECAUSE BEING ONE OF THE HANDFUL
OF BLACK GMS IN PRO SPORTS>>>
BEING AN ASSISTANT COACH.

HE HAD A CHANCE TO COME IN
AND SET THE TEAM UP
FOR THE FUTURE WITH THE KYRIE TRADE
AND LUE WOULD STILL BE THE COACH THERE.

:devil:
:evil:
 

theflyest

Veteran
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
29,303
Reputation
1,813
Daps
73,768
Reppin
NULL
BECAUSE BEING ONE OF THE HANDFUL
OF BLACK GMS IN PRO SPORTS>>>
BEING AN ASSISTANT COACH.

HE HAD A CHANCE TO COME IN
AND SET THE TEAM UP
FOR THE FUTURE WITH THE KYRIE TRADE
AND LUE WOULD STILL BE THE COACH THERE.

:devil:
:evil:

lol you’re projecting your perspective onto someone else

doesn’t work that way
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,143
Reppin
the ether
The only reason people like yourself even hold certain coaches in high esteem in the first place is overwhelmingly due to the superstar talent they had access to during their durations with the teams you mentioned .... :francis:
Project your ignorance onto others brehs. :mjlol:

I was a Larry Brown fan before he had ever won shyt, he made every team he went to better. :yeshrug:

The superiority of the scheming of coaches like Chuck Daly and Popovich is obvious. To just claim that superstars made them is a bunch of bullshyt. Phil Jackson scared me when he joined the Lakers (both times), MJ/Kobe/Shaq as #1's never won shyt without him. The respect players have for Pat Riley is legendary. And the Warriors looked completely different under Steve Kerr than they did under Mark Jackson.

If you wanna claim that these coaches only have reputations due to the players, then you're claiming those players don't know shyt. Because players are giving those coaches huge props for what they accomplished.




Like I Said ...Which one of those didn't have a superstar player on their roster :francis:
There are superstars all over the league. Most of them ain't doing any winning unless they're under a great coach. Pop didn't have any superstars in 2014. Wade in his 2nd year wasn't known as an MVP-level superstar like that yet when Riley got his 5th chip. Even the 1999 Spurs, you know that 2nd-year Duncan ain't doing shyt without Pop leading the way. Where were Shaq and Kobe, Malone and Stockton?



Which one of those didn't have a superstar on their roster :francis:
Way to just post shyt without reading. :mjlol:

Chuck Daly and Larry Brown did NOT coach superstar-driven teams. There were plenty of bigger superstars in the NBA. They coached well-balanced, well-coached teams that used defensive schemes to win.
 
Top