Project your ignorance onto others brehs.
You haven't displayed a cogent enough point here to make me feel as though I shouldn't assume ignorance of this topic coming from your end
I was a Larry Brown fan before he had ever won shyt, he made every team he went to better.
Ok...
The superiority of the scheming of coaches like Chuck Daly and Popovich is obvious. To just claim that superstars made them is a bunch of bullshyt.
Take away their superstars and they do not have their rings
Phil Jackson scared me when he joined the Lakers (both times)
Irrelevant anecdote... I doubt any serious basketball observer/participant would claim to be more fearful of a Phil Jackson in comparison to superstars such as Michael Jordan/Kobe Bryant or Shaquille O'Neal
MJ/Kobe/Shaq as #1's never won shyt without him.
Correlation =\= Causation obviously
Jordan never won without Pippen either whats your point...
The respect players have for Pat Riley is legendary. And the Warriors looked completely different under Steve Kerr than they did under Mark Jackson.
Irrelevant Fluffery in the first half ... Steve Kerr also took over a team that had already won 51 games the previous year who's star players were just entering their primes ... insinuating that he came in a did some sort of wizardry from scratch is of course a misnomer as we've seen the wizard promptly post a disgusting (league worst) 15-50 record when removed from his superstars
If you wanna claim that these coaches only have reputations due to the players, then you're claiming those players don't know shyt. Because players are giving those coaches huge props for what they accomplished.
Im claiming that without their superstars they wouldn't have their championship victories as made evident by Steve Kerr and his 15-50 record this season
There are superstars all over the league. Most of them ain't doing any winning unless they're under a great coach.
Don't know what you mean precisely by "aint doing any winning" however if you're referencing champions this same caveat would also apply to the 29 losing coaches that get sent home with nothing every season ... its a rather irrelevant & obvious notion to dredge up as some sort of trump card tipping in coaches favor when only 1 team can win each year of course
Pop didn't have any superstars in 2014. Wade in his 2nd year wasn't known as an MVP-level superstar like that yet when Riley got his 5th chip. Even the 1999 Spurs, you know that 2nd-year Duncan ain't doing shyt without Pop leading the way. Where were Shaq and Kobe, Malone and Stockton?
An enormous amount of mental gymnastics in the passage "Wade wasn't known as a superstar like that yet" what does that even mean regarding his on the court production
Bringing up Greg Popovich in 99 essentially underscores my point even further ..in 1997 his superstar goes down with injury and he promptly goes 17-47 for the remainder of that season which leads him to getting arguably some would say the best PF the league has ever seen with the #1 pick ... now stacked with another superstar big man to add to his already existing HOFer in Robinson he rides the great Tim Duncan to his 1st of 5 championships just two season after that abysmal superstar depleted 1st year .... this was really a terrible example on your end
"Where were Shaq & Kobe / Malone & Stockon" is this word soup supposed to be a rhetorical question or something ... please elaborate
Way to just post shyt without reading.
Chuck Daly and Larry Brown did NOT coach superstar-driven teams. There were plenty of bigger superstars in the NBA. They coached well-balanced, well-coached teams that used defensive schemes to win.
Chuck Daly coached Isaiah Thomas (who you're now insinuating wasn't a superstar out of desperation) ... leaving you with Larry Brown as literally the lone example to highlight your already fleeting point .... which of course only underscores how much of an exception that instance is to the clear historical rule I've referenced
