This thread isn't about games out now, it's about matching up with the One and PS4.
Try running Bioshock infinite in 1080p with a 1GB card, shyt would be ugly as fukk.
Console-only gamers - how much do you think it would cost to build a PC > next gen??
- Thread starter Kodie
- Start date
This thread isn't about games out now, it's about matching up with the One and PS4.
Try running Bioshock infinite in 1080p with a 1GB card, shyt would be ugly as fukk.
No...the right answer is about $660 with headroom to improve. I can probably chop it down to about $525ish with rebates and other shyt that I do
If you really want to see me get crazy I can get your final cost down to about $200-$300, but you need a good amount of cash flow and people who like PC's to make it work as you will be buying parts/waiting on rebates/and selling all the vouchers you get 
The next generation of desktop AMD APUs that is supposed to comeout later this year called, "Kaveri" is supposed to have a GCN (Graphics Core Next) GPU and also supports GDDR5 memory. So you'll be able to build a budget gaming PC that outperforms the PS4/XB1.
GODDAMN RIGHTironically the new consoles all use AMD builds
GODDAMN RIGHT
I just thought bout it, thats gotta be some self ether for microsoft going with AMD period with anything at this point
@Liquid been racking up a lot of W's this E3
from battlefield 4 having a more bad company 2 customization to it and the new consoles using AMD chipsets
Last edited by a moderator:
Reported to be about 3 billion + sony as well.I just thought bout it, thats gotta be some self ether for microsoft going with AMD period with anything at this point
@Liquid been racking up a lot of W's this E3
from battlefield 4 having a more bad company 2 customization to it and the new consoles using AMD chipsets
AMD might be back...I want them to come back and give Intel that proper competition :wow2:
Last edited by a moderator:
the self proclaimed nvidia fanboyGODDAMN RIGHT
about $13hunna is what im thinking. anything over $20hunna is overdoing or fAlienware 
I prefer nvidia graphics and the bang to buck (for the most part) of AMD processorsthe self proclaimed nvidia fanboy
It should be the other way around though
$350 with a intel processor and amd card would out perform $350 with AMD processor and nvidia graphics card and you can go up from there any price range and it would be the same
I hate knowing that games are out there that I can't play with physxIt should be the other way around though
$350 with a intel processor and amd card would out perform $350 with AMD processor and nvidia graphics card and you can go up from there any price range and it would be the same
Little shyt like that bothers me. Plus the GPU is always more important than the CPU...at least thats how it has been for the past 5 years or so. Hell, you can run almost any game @ full 1080P with a celeron as long as your video card is a beast.
A.J.Soprano
Banned
without NaughtyDog, Sony Santa Monica, Sucker Punch and Quantum Dream making PC games there's no way one could build a PC that's better than a PS4.
So you can forget about that my friend
Might get a slightly better GPU/visuals on 3rd party titles but that's about it.
So you can forget about that my friend
Might get a slightly better GPU/visuals on 3rd party titles but that's about it.
All most PC gamers need is valve with steam pumping everything out. PC games will also start looking much better than PS4/XBOX One games within 6 months after launching. Seriously...a 7850 is considered almost mid-range at this point.
Also, I see a break-through in emulation pretty soon
