but he couldn't stop anyone either. Nash was the product of a system that confused the league for a minute. then people figured it out. and they got exposed in the playoffs year in year out.
nba equivalent of the wildcat offense.
Damn....I forgot how good Kobe was in 05-06
- Thread starter Swagnificent
- Start date
but he couldn't stop anyone either. Nash was the product of a system that confused the league for a minute. then people figured it out. and they got exposed in the playoffs year in year out.
nba equivalent of the wildcat offense.
3 of Kobe's rings were gift wrapped by Shaq
Let's compare Finals MVPs
how about we compare what they did in the west finals (aka the real finals). not when they faced the jv squads from the east.
madness
Taking my talents to South Beach
"Forgot" my ass
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
how about we compare what they did in the west finals (aka the real finals). not when they faced the jv squads from the east.
Thanks for not mentioning Kobe and Shaq stats in the 2001 finals and his 2000 Finals.
At the end of the day, Kobe wasn't even the best player 3 of those 5 rings.
you must be a kid. everyone who actually watched basketball in the early 00s knows the real nba finals was always the west finals. the finals were mostly just a coronation. shaq got to beat up on the weak east teams and collected the mvps. however, kobe was the one the team relied on in the clutch and he carried them in the west when they played teams like the spurs.
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
U the worst poster ever.
Kobe won 5 rings while being a 2nd option on 3 of them.
Kobe wasn't even that good in 2000
just admit that is true is shut up
Lmao at scoring more POINTS being what makes a season good.
32 (50%) /7/5
35 (45%)/5/5
scoring is the hardest thing to do in basketball. there's a reason they award the team who scores more points the W.
Right
Let not even get into the squad Kobe had against the Suns...
But how many rings does Nash have again? I think he's been dunked on more times than he's been in the finals
Who the fukk said Nash had a greater legacy or more rings than anyone?
The dude was a matchup nightmare for the Lakers be regularly destroyed them in the playoffs. Not a single player on the Lakers, Kobe included, were able to stop Nash.
Fisher having more rings than Nash doesn't mean shyt to me.
And Durant scored 3 points less, on much higher efficiency, while leading his team to a top seed in a brutal West while Kobe was shooting for a bottom seed.
Durant averaged more assists, rebounds, and scored almost as many points on a much higher percentage while playing less minutes.
LMAO at Kobe needing 7 more FGA per game to score 3 more points than Durant.
Still shyt on Kobe at his best
no. his team beat kobe's team. a team where kwame brown, smush parker, and luke walton were starting. while nash was playing with shawm marion, amare stoudemire, and leonardo barbosa.
once kobe got adequate teammates, he rolled through the nash and the suns from 2008-2010.
i know u remember this gem.
So you'd take Minnesota Kevin love (26 PPG on 45% shooting) over Prime Tim Duncan (23 PPG on 51% shooting)?
GOAT at being the WOAT
So you'd take Minnesota Kevin love (26 PPG on 45% shooting) over Prime Tim Duncan (23 PPG on 51% shooting)?
GOAT at being the WOAT
kevin love is a fat stat padding bum. i wouldn't take him over taj gibson. unlike you, i don't go by box score stats. i go by my eye test. i knew kevin love was a bum regardless of what he put up on the stat sheet.
no. his team beat kobe's team. a team where kwame brown, smush parker, and luke walton were starting. while nash was playing with shawm marion, amare stoudemire, and leonardo barbosa.
once kobe got adequate teammates, he rolled through the nash and the suns from 2008-2010.
i know u remember this gem.
Brag about beating a 35 year old Steve Nash led Suns that was starting a 37 year old Grant hill, brehs.
Imagine trying to brag about beating a 35 year old superstar is a big deal...does Durant shytting on Kobe in the 2012 playoffs mean anything?