Damn....I forgot how good Kobe was in 05-06

Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,871
Daps
84,293
Reppin
NULL
Nash has pretty made a playoff career out of shytting on Primebe.

People sleeping on Nash because he a goofy looking cac but Nash literally evicscerated the Lakers in the playoffs. Couldn't be stopped or contained.

but he couldn't stop anyone either. Nash was the product of a system that confused the league for a minute. then people figured it out. and they got exposed in the playoffs year in year out.

nba equivalent of the wildcat offense.
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,501
Reputation
-2,820
Daps
29,940
Reppin
Chi-town
how about we compare what they did in the west finals (aka the real finals). not when they faced the jv squads from the east.









Thanks for not mentioning Kobe and Shaq stats in the 2001 finals and his 2000 Finals.

At the end of the day, Kobe wasn't even the best player 3 of those 5 rings.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,871
Daps
84,293
Reppin
NULL
Thanks for not mentioning Kobe and Shaq stats in the 2001 finals and his 2000 Finals.

At the end of the day, Kobe wasn't even the best player 3 of those 5 rings.

you must be a kid. everyone who actually watched basketball in the early 00s knows the real nba finals was always the west finals. the finals were mostly just a coronation. shaq got to beat up on the weak east teams and collected the mvps. however, kobe was the one the team relied on in the clutch and he carried them in the west when they played teams like the spurs.
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,501
Reputation
-2,820
Daps
29,940
Reppin
Chi-town
you must be a kid. everyone who actually watched basketball in the early 00s knows the real nba finals was always the west finals. the finals were mostly just a coronation. shaq got to beat up on the weak east teams and collected the mvps. however, kobe was the one the team relied on in the clutch and he carried them in the west when they played teams like the spurs.

U the worst poster ever.

Kobe won 5 rings while being a 2nd option on 3 of them.

Kobe wasn't even that good in 2000


just admit that is true is shut up
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,750
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,249
Reppin
NULL
only people who have scored more points in a season than kobe in 2005 was jordan (1987) and wilt (several times). so no, they've not had better seasons. but then again, you let someone named john hollinger tell you what is a good season and what ain't.

35/5/5 >>> any season since mike in 88.

Lmao at scoring more POINTS being what makes a season good.

32 (50%) /7/5

35 (45%)/5/5
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,750
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,249
Reppin
NULL
but he couldn't stop anyone either. Nash was the product of a system that confused the league for a minute. then people figured it out. and they got exposed in the playoffs year in year out.

nba equivalent of the wildcat offense.

Still shyt on Kobe at his best :mjlol:
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,750
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,249
Reppin
NULL
Right :rudy:


captpnu11304270535lakers_suns_basketball.jpg


Let not even get into the squad Kobe had against the Suns...


But how many rings does Nash have again? I think he's been dunked on more times than he's been in the finals

Who the fukk said Nash had a greater legacy or more rings than anyone?

The dude was a matchup nightmare for the Lakers be regularly destroyed them in the playoffs. Not a single player on the Lakers, Kobe included, were able to stop Nash.

Fisher having more rings than Nash doesn't mean shyt to me.
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,750
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,249
Reppin
NULL
scoring is the hardest thing to do in basketball. there's a reason they award the team who scores more points the W.

And Durant scored 3 points less, on much higher efficiency, while leading his team to a top seed in a brutal West while Kobe was shooting for a bottom seed.

Durant averaged more assists, rebounds, and scored almost as many points on a much higher percentage while playing less minutes.

LMAO at Kobe needing 7 more FGA per game to score 3 more points than Durant.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,871
Daps
84,293
Reppin
NULL
Still shyt on Kobe at his best :mjlol:

no. his team beat kobe's team. a team where kwame brown, smush parker, and luke walton were starting. while nash was playing with shawm marion, amare stoudemire, and leonardo barbosa.

once kobe got adequate teammates, he rolled through the nash and the suns from 2008-2010.



i know u remember this gem. :banderas:
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,871
Daps
84,293
Reppin
NULL
So you'd take Minnesota Kevin love (26 PPG on 45% shooting) over Prime Tim Duncan (23 PPG on 51% shooting)? :francis:

GOAT at being the WOAT

kevin love is a fat stat padding bum. i wouldn't take him over taj gibson. unlike you, i don't go by box score stats. i go by my eye test. i knew kevin love was a bum regardless of what he put up on the stat sheet.
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,750
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,249
Reppin
NULL
no. his team beat kobe's team. a team where kwame brown, smush parker, and luke walton were starting. while nash was playing with shawm marion, amare stoudemire, and leonardo barbosa.

once kobe got adequate teammates, he rolled through the nash and the suns from 2008-2010.



i know u remember this gem. :banderas:


Brag about beating a 35 year old Steve Nash led Suns that was starting a 37 year old Grant hill, brehs.

Imagine trying to brag about beating a 35 year old superstar is a big deal...does Durant shytting on Kobe in the 2012 playoffs mean anything?
 
Top