This is a false equivalence. They're completely different types of players.
The thing you have to understand is, the crux of Draymond's impact has never been through scoring. It's basically EVERYTHING else. He quarterbacks the offense and defense: he is letting his teammates know exactly where they need to be and what to do, and his actions are typically one step ahead of the opposition. Very few players in this league have that type of control over what's happening on the floor.
That is his value to this team, which is even more important given the makeup of the personnel, which the large majority of, have never been in a winning culture.
Now, dig: if Draymond lost all of that ability, but instead became a 13-15 point scorer on good efficiency, he'd actually be a worse player.
You got it. Denial is hard. But at this rate Draymond is not playing well at all.