Democratic Party Rebuild

[Loose]

I'd rather lose another senate seat right now then have someone like this in the dem party, this is absolutely disgusting and what the party should not be supporting

 

[wire28]

I’ll let you think what you want. I’m telling you the truth but you refuse to listen because it goes against your grifting leftist talking points. Think what you want I’m tired of the back and forth

Loose screws has finally wore out one of the last people not subscribed to grifting accelerationist echo chambers who was willing to engage with him

Now he’s stuck to talk to the same 3 people that dap him up daily about why they regret voting for Kamala Harris in May of 2025 and explaining to each other why trumps daily evisceration of basic rights is actually the dems fault

 

[Outlaw]

Loose screws has finally wore out one of the last people not subscribed to grifting accelerationist echo chambers who was willing to engage with him

Now he’s stuck to talk to the same 3 people that dap him up daily about why they regret voting for Kamala Harris in May of 2025 and explaining to each other why trumps daily evisceration of basic rights is actually the dems fault

I’ve been trying to get him to think for himself. I’ve heard all the talking points he regurgitates but nothing I say to him sticks. The indoctrination is too strong and is only getting stronger.

He’s saying he wants to lose senate seats and the White House if the candidate isn’t pure enough, simultaneously their opponents will erode and institutionally prevent the issues he claims to care about.

True clown world shyt

 

[Loose]

Loose screws has finally wore out one of the last people not subscribed to grifting accelerationist echo chambers who was willing to engage with him

Now he’s stuck to talk to the same 3 people that dap him up daily about why they regret voting for Kamala Harris in May of 2025 and explaining to each other why trumps daily evisceration of basic rights is actually the dems fault

Mr Wayne county going to save democracy playing background fodder as usual for HL posters nut sacks.

 

[Loose]

I’ve been trying to get him to think for himself. I’ve heard all the talking points he regurgitates but nothing I say to him sticks. The indoctrination is too strong and is only getting stronger.

He’s saying he wants to lose senate seats and the White House if the candidate isn’t pure enough, simultaneously their opponents will erode and institutionally prevent the issues he claims to care about.

True clown world shyt

Yes I'd like to lose senate seats if the said candidate is actively hurting the democratic agenda and image. The democratic party national image has be coined as do nothing democrats for a reason. Democrats had the majority and squandered it due to corporate interest. Republicans don't play cover for people like sienma Joe manchin fetterman etc because they actively hurt the parties prospects long term

 

[Outlaw]

Yes I'd like to lose senate seats if the said candidate is actively hurting the democratic agenda and image. The democratic party national image has be coined as do nothing democrats for a reason. Democrats had the majority and squandered it due to corporate interest. Republicans don't play cover for people like sienma Joe manchin fetterman etc because they actively hurt the parties prospects long term

If you demand black or white in a world of grey, you’ll never get what you want

 

[Loose]

If you demand black or white in a world of grey, you’ll never get what you want

I dont believe having a party agenda is considered black and white, the party should have a few underlying principles that it stand for.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Hood Critic]

I’ve been trying to get him to think for himself. I’ve heard all the talking points he regurgitates but nothing I say to him sticks. The indoctrination is too strong and is only getting stronger.

He’s saying he wants to lose senate seats and the White House if the candidate isn’t pure enough, simultaneously their opponents will erode and institutionally prevent the issues he claims to care about.

True clown world shyt

What's even crazier, if you take a random look at his past posts compared to the cognitive dissonance we've seen the last year.

The radicalization of liberals will eventually become a widespread conversation. It's literally the same template that was used to create the Tea Party and now MAGA.

 

[voltronblack]

JB Pritzker’s ‘mad as hell’ moment marks a turning point for Dems

Democratic voters have made clear they want a fighter. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker is willing to give them one.

thehill.com

That was the message New Hampshire Democrats received loud and clear on Sunday, when Pritzker rocked the room — and went viral across the Internet — with his fiery condemnation of his party’s middle-of-the-road pushovers.

“For far too long we’ve been guilty of listening to a bunch of do-nothing political types who would tell us that America’s house is not on fire, even as the flames are licking their faces,” Pritzker said. “Those same do-nothing Democrats want to blame our losses on our defense of Black people and trans kids and immigrants instead of their own lack of guts and gumption.”

Pritzker’s pointed remarks drew an instant contrast with fellow 2028 prospect Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who calls for the party to seek conciliation over conflict. But it was more than that; millions of Democrats have spent months telling pollsters they want to see a more aggressive Democratic Party. Pritzker’s no-compromise message just made him the standard-bearer for the party’s disaffected masses.

Pritzker’s speech comes at a complex moment for Democratic insiders. President Trump will mark his 100th day dogged by an abysmal 39 percent approval rating and a stock market that is on course for its worst run since the Great Depression. The speed and breadth of Trump’s collapse has coincided with rising support for Democrats after a month near record lows. But the news isn’t all positive — a recent Harvard Youth Poll showed the Democratic Party still struggling to win back young voters who see congressional Democrats as exactly the “do-nothings” Pritzker criticized.





At first glance, Pritzker is an unlikely messenger for an unapologetically progressive platform. He’s the second-richest elected official in the country, clocking in at nearly $4 billion in personal wealth. That is paradoxical in a party where Sen. Bernie Sanders’s Fighting Oligarchy Tour is packing arenas with a message heavy on taxing the rich and uplifting the working class. But look closer, and Pritzker reveals himself to be something truly rare: a traitor to his class.


That phrase was most notably used to criticize two other patrician presidential hopefuls, Republican Theodore Roosevelt and his fifth cousin, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Like Pritzker, both Roosevelts could easily have ignored the concerns of a working class that was as invisible in 1900 and 1932 as it is today. Yet both found themselves not only fighting for the working class but becoming the figureheads of social justice revolutions. They reached that peak not by triangulating their politics to be inoffensive but by speaking fearlessly about the principles that formed the bedrock of their belief system.

In fact, Pritzker’s words sound quite a bit like the elder Roosevelt’s remarks in Chicago during the heated campaign of 1912. In a speech that wouldn’t be out of place on Sanders’s barnstorming tour, Roosevelt condemned the conservative Supreme Court for enforcing on working people a “submission … which would turn constitutional provisions which were intended to favor social justice and advancement, into prohibitions against such justice.”

“Our purpose is not to impugn the courts, but to emancipate them from a position where they stand in the way of social justice,” Roosevelt said. “As a people, we cannot afford to let any group of citizens or any individual citizen, live or labor under conditions which are injurious to the common welfare.”

Roosevelt believed in what he called “masculine” politics — the politics of fighting back when something is fundamentally broken in our nation. Pritzker made the same case to an audience of Democrats eager for someone, anyone, to throw a strong punch. Polls show that large swaths of the Democratic base feel the party has surrendered the fight on key social issues to Republicans without much resistance. Pritzker is right that voters are angry at Democrats not for what they believe but for the moral courage they’ve so often failed to demonstrate.

Far from disqualifying, Pritzker’s wealth offers him the freedom to voice voters’ deep frustrations without worrying about fundraising boycotts or political blowback from the conflict-averse stiffs in Washington. Some progressives may find his Scrooge McDuck-ian wealth distasteful, but his actions in Illinois and on the national stage make him a stronger ally of progressive principles than many of the self-professed “pragmatic progressives,” who seem to think actual progress is simply too radical for the American people.


Democratic voters have made clear they want a fighter. Pritzker is willing to give them one. If he can use his voice to spur other Democrats to find their spines, voters will reward him handsomely.

This is not a time for small men. As Pritzker will be happy to tell you, he’s anything but a small man.

Max Burns is a veteran Democratic strategist and founder of Third Degree Strategies.

 

[wire28]

What's even crazier, if you take a random look at his past posts compared to the cognitive dissonance we've seen the last year.

The radicalization of liberals will eventually become a widespread conversation. It's literally the same template that was used to create the Tea Party and now MAGA.

I’ve largely said it in jest but it really is wild to see someone fall down the rabbit hole in real time.

 

[wire28]

Sorry TBC getting no play in 2025 after the shyt they did leading up to the election

 

[Loose]

What's even crazier, if you take a random look at his past posts compared to the cognitive dissonance we've seen the last year.

The radicalization of liberals will eventually become a widespread conversation. It's literally the same template that was used to create the Tea Party and now MAGA.

This is why we need a team party like movement before the primary; the democrat parties approval rating is in the 20s! fukking sub 30 approval rating! And your argument against it is " the radicalization of liberals" have led to the discontent throughout the entire voting populace. It's freaking insane some of you still live on this pretend island that the party is going in the right direction . Party is so bad that they can't even agree that the term oligarchy perfectly defines what we're seeing from trump. Trump has been absolute dog shyt and the voting populace still rather have trump in control of power then any liberal candidate that can be put up

 

[Hood Critic]

This is why we need a team party like movement before the primary; the democrat parties approval rating is in the 20s! fukking sub 30 approval rating! And your argument against it is " the radicalization of liberals" have led to the discontent throughout the entire voting populace. It's freaking insane some of you still live on this pretend island that the party is going in the right direction . Party is so bad that they can't even agree that the term oligarchy perfectly defines what we're seeing from trump. Trump has been absolute dog shyt and the voting populace still rather have trump in control of power then any liberal candidate that can be put up

You're a perfect example of how radicalization has divided the party and aided in sowing discontent. Look at your own moral compass prior to Gaza and then ask yourself what motivated you to sour on the democratic party enough to find comfort in cutting off your nose to spite your face. Both genocide and oppression has long existed but you believe you weren't influenced to solely hold the prior administration responsible for transactions that happened before and will continue to happen with Israel for geopolitical reasons.

That's a fascinating strawman, "the democratic party is going in the right direction". Who in this thread has indicated that no change is needed within the party?

 

[Loose]

You're a perfect example of how radicalization has divided the party and aided in sowing discontent. Look at your own moral compass prior to Gaza

and then ask yourself what motivated you to sour on the democratic party enough to find comfort in cutting off your nose to spite your face.

It's almost like our tax dollars being used to facilitate a fukking genocide is so far up on the moral scale that it could " radicalize" anyone with a moral compass.

Both genocide and oppression has long existed but you believe you weren't influenced to solely hold the prior administration responsible for transactions

It has existed, and our party in particular at one time used to fight to rectify those ills that have been caused by those whom were in power prior to segregation.

that happened before and will continue to happen with Israel for geopolitical reasons.

Unfortunately, yes it will happen again because cowards like YOU chose to continue defending the fact that our once anti war party slaughtered innocent families babies women etc by the 100s of thousands due to solely geopolitical reasons that will only lead to blowback in the next decade. You'd expect this type of defense out of republican war hawks. The fact that biden lost and cowards like you can't even STILL admit he was wrong says enough about some of you.

That's a fascinating strawman, "the democratic party is going in the right direction". Who in this thread has indicated that no change is needed within the party?

You in here handwaving the fact that the party is responsible for overseeing a genocide , that is the very definition of going to the right