Doubt it. Doesn’t have Zohran’s motion which means no where near the financial backing. He should definitely try though.Could he pull it off?
Doubt it. Doesn’t have Zohran’s motion which means no where near the financial backing. He should definitely try though.Could he pull it off?
I think vast majority are a lost cause but if you use @mastermind idra of being more available on the platforms young people use you may be able to claw back some of the youth vote by just behaving like a human.I see ppl in here still thinking you can “message” MAGA voters wit interviews/podcasts/streaming. They a lost cause.
They LOVE to vote against their own self interest. Those bucktooth Arkansas farmers know damn well Trump is the cause of their misfortunes. You not changing their mind with some talk radio show
![]()
Maybe if zohran wins he can get some of the rubDoubt it. Doesn’t have Zohran’s motion which means no where near the financial backing. He should definitely try though.
if Jeffries seems like an obstructionist.YupDoubt it. Doesn’t have Zohran’s motion which means no where near the financial backing. He should definitely try though.
This what happens when you look for whose the best fundraiser dikk eater instead of leader of individualsPeople were really excited that this clown was gonna lead house Dems. Americans have no standards.
That and aipac/israel is going to put 10s of millions into that race.Yup
And Zohran was advantaged by New York City having a matchijg campaign funding scheme. It don’t apply to congress
definitely.This what happens when you look for whose the best fundraiser dikk eater instead of leader of individuals
This will be good
)Powerful interview from the most handsome governor (according to some)
So with all that said. If he’s on the ticket does he have your voteI will say that I never noticed how similar Trump and Newsom were in their mannerisms until watching this. Not a bad test-run on combating criticisms on California. But it's basically a intrasquad game, he should be comfortable and confident in this situation.
I think he likely ends up VP bare minimum, if he can humble himself to accept it. He probably cooks everyone on either side except for Pritzker in a debate.
The Kirk/Bannon defense was pure bullshyt. He waffled on the Israel question but that's unsurprising. His "AIPAC? Never heard of them. Not relevant to my day to day." Was not very convincing.
Also, it's hard for Democratics to sell mamdami as pie in the sky when we've seen what republicans have been able to "accomplish". A lot of things are possible if you want them bad enough, and I don't think the "corporate funded office holders" (vans language) really want what Mamdami is selling.

What was it that he said? "I don't have all of the information right now so I'm hesitant to make any definitive statements,"So with all that said. If he’s on the ticket does he have your vote![]()