Democratic Party Rebuild

[Loose]

Are communist not part of the online left?

Whose these imaginary communist you referring too? You literally sound like a fox news republican

 

[John Reena]

Progressives, who watched Bernie “2 time loser”Sanders, Jamaal “Fire Alarm” Bowman, Cori Bush lose want to lecture democrats about how to win elections with the goofy progressive agenda is comedy.



If America is so eager to adopt the progressive agenda like they claim, why didn't any of those ppl I mention win? Hmmmm

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

Of course there's no perfect candidate my issue is why are democrats catering to republicans? you don't see republicans politicans talking about working across the aisle to democrats and running on moderate policies. Republicans voters hate democrats policies , democrat voters hate republican policies why are we trying to reach out to 2% of republicans?


after losing multiple elections to trump and backing a senile president that clearly wanted trump to win , im fine with this. Zero lessons was learned in 2016, we repeated history twice the party needs a civil war. We have tons of influencers that tweet about trump all day to the average voter? not everyone needs to be in that space.

Destroy and rebuild the democratic party.


Let's stop running on neoliberalism policies that cater to republicans maybe disillusioned people like seals will be happy.


Nothing she should have never been the candidate in the first place. She called black folks super predators , how about we stop picking bad politicans to lead the party ?

Biden administration pointed to wallstreet stats that are held up by ai to justify peoples cost of living being good, that's ignoring your constitutes. Kamala ran on some neoliberal continuation of biden that gets no one happy.


Disagree

The issue with this is that younger people haven’t proven they can carry the party. The only thing they’ve proven is what they can’t/won’t do, which is vote and raise money. Especially if it’s not someone they agree with 100%.

Let’s take India Walton for example on a small scale. She couldn’t even get enough of her base to come out and press a button and lost to someone who had to get people to write his actual name to count as a vote.

You can’t win elections like that. On a national scale, democrats can’t just say F off to anyone 40-65 in favor of people who say they’ll only vote based on policies that have nothing to do with life in America.

When it comes to Hilary or any other politician they may view as a bad candidate: if they’re the candidate of majority choice and they ask you what do you want and how can I help, are you just not going to engage? That’s also another issue with that group of voters. There’s no room for collaboration if you’re not kissing their ass exactly the way they want it, pause.

I do agree with not pandering to republicans. It was never a good strategy. And that consultant class of democrats do need to be ushered out.

 

[Squirrel from Meteor Man]

Whose these imaginary communist you referring too? You literally sound like a fox news republican

I agree I haven’t heard anyone describe themselves as a communist in person or online probably ever

Progressives, who watched Bernie “2 time loser”Sanders, Jamaal “Fire Alarm” Bowman, Cori Bush lose want to lecture democrats about how to win elections with the goofy progressive agenda is comedy.



If America is so eager to adopt the progressive agenda like they claim, why didn't any of those ppl I mention win? Hmmmm

There’s room for a progressive agenda, but they have to have room for collaboration. Being abrasive and alienating people is not sound strategy for anybody unless you’re a Republican racist.

Bowman and Bush were both targeted by genocidal AIPAC donors who had nothing to do with their districts so I don’t know if those are great examples imo.

 

[Loose]

The issue with this is that younger people haven’t proven they can carry the party. The only thing they’ve proven is what they can’t/won’t do, which is vote and raise money. Especially if it’s not someone they agree with 100%.

Please explain to me how the younger people supposed to carry the party when the elderly refuses to relinquish power? We have now had an entire generation of people who have not had the opportunity to walk into politics due to the silent generation and boomers sitting on committees for 50 years.

Let’s take India Walton for example on a small scale. She couldn’t even get enough of her base to come out and press a button and lost to someone who had to get people to write his actual name to count as a vote.

Walton only won by 1500 votes in a democrat only primary, the actual issue should be why is the democrat establishment supporting democrats running on non party lines? She lost to a corrupt politican who had businesses and republicans in Buffalo promoting someone who has destroyed Buffalo being the only rightful choice

You can’t win elections like that. On a national scale, democrats can’t just say F off to anyone 40-65 in favor of people who say they’ll only vote based on policies that have nothing to do with life in America.

Not sure what you sayinf here

When it comes to Hilary or any other politician they may view as a bad candidate: if they’re the candidate of majority choice and they ask you what do you want and how can I help, are you just not going to engage? That’s also another issue with that group of voters. There’s no room for collaboration if you’re not kissing their ass exactly the way they want it, pause

We've known since at least 2006 Hilary clinton was a bad candidate, why did the party anoint and appoint a clearly bad candidate? The dnc directly was pushing for hiliary to win the election, they even had the dncc to try to open the field for her. Hilary should have never been in front of those groups of voters to ask the question of what can she do for them, because she flat out wss a terrible candidate.

I do agree with not pandering to republicans. It was never a good strategy. And that consultant class of democrats do need to be ushered out.

Hilary types is what we run in order to pander to republicans

 

[Secure Da Bag]

What was it that he said? "I don't have all of the information right now so I'm hesitant to make any definitive statements,"

rep

 

[Outlaw]

Whose these imaginary communist you referring too? You literally sound like a fox news republican

Your thought leader Piker said that communism should be the end game for society, the fact that you think communist don’t have a loud voice in the online left shows you’re being intellectually dishonest or ignorant

 

[Loose]

Your thought leader Piker said that communism should be the end game for society, the fact that you think communist don’t have a loud voice in the online left shows you’re being intellectually dishonest or ignorant

Your infatuation with a random streamer is weird, i legitimately think you may have a crush on him. I forget he exist until you bring him up constantly. I'm sure he didnt say such thing and you making shyt up as usual.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

I'm good if we never hear from this woman ever again.

SHE PUT US IN THIS SITUATION BY FAILING TO APPEAL TO A WINNING COALITION OF VOTERS! SHE RAN A BAD CAMPAIGN AND LOST THE ELECTION, IMPERILLING US ALL! THE PUBLIC DIDN'T FAIL KAMALA, SHE FAILED US! Y'all have to get that through your heads.

I didn't think she was the best candidate. But it was hers to lose.

But honestly, I'm glad she's talking her shyt. That's exactly what she needs to tell the voting public. Elections have consequences.

 

[wire28]

Progressives, who watched Bernie “2 time loser”Sanders, Jamaal “Fire Alarm” Bowman, Cori Bush lose want to lecture democrats about how to win elections with the goofy progressive agenda is comedy.



If America is so eager to adopt the progressive agenda like they claim, why didn't any of those ppl I mention win? Hmmmm

Progressive policies positively poll with 80% of the country, the people will obviously pick a politician like this every time the only reason insert progressive candidate lost is because of centrist Voltron/AIPAC/insert other excuse

 

[wire28]

I agree I haven’t heard anyone describe themselves as a communist in person or online probably ever

There’s room for a progressive agenda, but they have to have room for collaboration. Being abrasive and alienating people is not sound strategy for anybody unless you’re a Republican racist.

Bowman and Bush were both targeted by genocidal AIPAC donors who had nothing to do with their districts so I don’t know if those are great examples imo.

These people are progressive until it’s time to get in the voting booth. We have an ally Ryan grim taking the mask off accidentally and tap dancing for Charlie. These people aren’t our friends, they showed us with their vitriol when black southerners didn’t do as they were told and vote for Bernie

 

[wire28]

I didn't think she was the best candidate. But it was hers to lose.

But honestly, I'm glad she's talking her shyt. That's exactly what she needs to tell the voting public. Elections have consequences.

Kamala was a robot who couldn’t get off her donor talking points I don’t like Kamala being authentically mean to me when I call her out her name

 

[KFBF]

The thread devolved into shyt posting again. Sad.

 

[Outlaw]

Your infatuation with a random streamer is weird, i legitimately think you may have a crush on him. I forget he exist until you bring him up constantly. I'm sure he didnt say such thing and you making shyt up as usual.

You constantly repeat online leftie talking points but you’re completely oblivious to who are one of the main originators of the perpetual group thought.

We’re fukked

 

[Loose]

You constantly repeat online leftie talking points but you’re completely oblivious to who are one of the main originators of the perpetual group thought.

We’re fukked

When you dont stand for nothing like you do you think any and everyone with principles sound the same . It's very inconceivable and an inconvenience that people could be anti genocide and anti neoliberal policies. Your man crush on that Turkish streamer needs to be studied