IIVI
Superstar
Yeah it's definitely a slippery slope. For example Feinstein did a lot of her net positive, humane work at 70-85.Kicking people out at 70 is pretty extreme, there are some very physically/mentally capable 70 year olds. My great grandma is 81 and she still drives (with no problems), walks without a cane, takes care of herself, etc. It depends on the person.
But I wouldn't be opposed to people above a certain age having to take test every year or two to make sure they're not senile and are physically capable of the job. People who know they wouldn't pass would have an incentive to retire to avoid embarrassment.
That said, many people that age are obviously not capable.
So I agree, I actually think standardized, non-bias tests would be the best. Take a page out of whiteboard interviews and protect against cheating. If they can pass the exams, they can run and would have to pass them periodically.
Last edited:




