What has he lied on? All I see is you attacking the person and not the argument.
Because he doesn't understand what he trots out and steamrolls through logic barriers without regard for the rules of debate.
All of those three tenants he bases all of his theological debates on are complete and utter bullshyt
Even further, WLC is a symptom of a larger problem...and that is irrationality. I could not care any less about WLC. But you seem to defend him as if what he's saying is unique. Its not. Its a dressed up version of moving the goalposts.