Dl hugley with one of the most logical memes ever. Ether

Shorty K

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
3,480
Reputation
215
Daps
12,373
I agree. But it's also important to ensure both parents are contributing financially to the well-being of said child. If one party asks the state to intervene to make sure that happens, then it's within it's right to do so. I know it's not perfect and men get disproportionately punished, but the above is in society's best interest.

Mk well if you think people (men) should be forced by the government to financially contribute to a child they created but don't want have you can't get mad at people who think women should be forced by the government to not kill a child they created but don't want to have :yeshrug:.

Make better decisions :yeshrug:.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,170
Daps
56,251
Well his statement is made on a false premise and the 2 don't equate for a number of reasons. Limiting reproductive rights "harms" men just as much as women.
Whats the false premise?

The meme was about women's hypocrisy, not who does or doesn't get harmed by "limiting reproductive rights".

And I never he said anything I was speaking on the general tone of the conversation. Idk why I need to explain that because it's pretty obvious. If I didn't say "DL said xyz" then than is not what I am saying.
I didn't accuse you of accusing DL of saying anything. If I didn't say "you said DL said...." then that's not what I was saying:francis:

You posted without quoting anyone specifically so it's common sense to assume that you were responding to the op which was DL's meme. If you weren't respondng to DL's meme then maybe you should learn to articulate and express yourself better. Posters are having different conversations in this thread but the "general tone" of the conversation is about DL's meme and your post was basically irrelevant to the meme. That was the point.


You don't know what I care about so you can keep that part.
:mjlol: at not being able to help yourself. You clearly don't care about men being potentially harmed by abortion being banned. You care about yourself.

As far as the "responsible" part well. Most Black children are born out of wedlock :francis:. So until we reinstill the value of marriage, which so many of you are against, then unplanned pregnancy are how the AA population is maintaining. If everyone all of a sudden becomes responsible then the birthrate drops to zero (being kinda funny and being kinda serious).

So we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. Until the community comes together to improve the culture then people should be allowed to do what they please and maintain their right IMO.
PS please don't make this personal. You tend to do that. Try to keep it general if you are able.
A lot of you take this site waaaay too seriously. I don't make anything here personal because I don't know any of you personally.

While these "gmb" clowns don't represent me(married) or most black men, a big reason that men are becoming less interested in marriage is because women are less and less likely to be marriage material. You talk shyt about the "gmb" men but don't have anything to say about this thot/slut culture revolution that black women are pushing full steam ahead. Even the wives with successful, loving, and committed husbands(as far as we know) are envying the thots/sluts. Shout to Ayesha Curry.

The reality is that much of the black community's dysfunction is the result of the destruction of the black family which has led to over 70% of black kids raised in single homes. So if we've got to sacrifice some numbers and population size to get things back on track then so be it. Yes, I believe that if only blacks in stable
committed functional relationships had children, our community would be much better off even if we were half as big. Your "well dysfunctional black people stopped having kids then the black birth rate would drop" excuse is just sad.

Just the celebration of the limiting of women's right when it equal impacts men is just so silly to me.
Here you go with this straw man deflection again. Who's celebrating? DL's meme didn't celebrate abortion potentially being banned so who are you talking about? You say things that have obvious implications then get bytchy when I comment on your implications. Hilarious.

This wouldn't effect men equally because men don't birth children. This clearly effects women more. Like DL's meme pointed out, men have never had abortion rights. Men have always been dependent on and at the mercy of the woman's decision.


.
 

GodsPerspective

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,378
Reputation
945
Daps
13,130
Yes, because after delivering the baby, the woman completely disappears and plays no role in child rearing -- emotionally, financially or otherwise.

:stopitslime: Seriously, are you fukking retarded?

I’ll entertain you even though I think you’re a stupid fukk.

We are strictly looking at what the op posted.

Which is comparing the consequences of the government being involved in a mans life vs a woman’s.

If the government is involved in a mans life, he is on the hook for 18 years via child support.

If the government is involved in a woman’s life, she can still give the baby up for adoption/ a foster home after the 9 months can she not?


Y’all don’t fukking think. Stay acting emotional just for the sake of it
 

GodsPerspective

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,378
Reputation
945
Daps
13,130
Maybe your friend and any man who doesn't wanna pay should make better dikk decisions.

Ya'll know that busting raw in a chick leads to pregnancy and you know that pregnancy leads to child support. Yet he and men like him still go around busting in joints.

Just like she could have an abortion. He could have strapped up or got the snip snip. Maybe you should encourage your friends to take either of those options rather than giving the finger to infants.

So if men are irresponsible and don’t strap up they have no say in the matter.

If women are irresponsible and don’t use protection they have 100% say in the matter.

Am I getting this right?
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,500
Reputation
295
Daps
6,381
I’ll entertain you even though I think you’re a stupid fukk.

We are strictly looking at what the op posted.

Which is comparing the consequences of the government being involved in a mans life vs a woman’s.

If the government is involved in a mans life, he is on the hook for 18 years via child support.

If the government is involved in a woman’s life, she can still give the baby up for adoption/ a foster home after the 9 months can she not?


Y’all don’t fukking think. Stay acting emotional just for the sake of it

Way to confirm your stupidity. If a family gives up their parental rights and puts the child up for adoption, neither the mother or father remain responsible financially. Your point only makes sense if the father is responsible regardless of if the woman chooses adoption or not. They both are responsible until they are not. In principle, and under the law this is 100% fair.
 

GodsPerspective

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,378
Reputation
945
Daps
13,130
Way to confirm your stupidity. If a family gives up their parental rights and puts the child up for adoption, neither the mother or father remain responsible financially. Your point only makes sense if the father is responsible regardless of if the woman chooses adoption or not. They both are responsible until they are not. In principle, and under the law this is 100% fair.
:russell:

So if men are irresponsible and don’t strap up they have no say in the matter.

If women are irresponsible and don’t use protection they have 100% say in the matter.

Am I getting this right?

You are a homo correct?
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,500
Reputation
295
Daps
6,381
:russell:



You are a homo correct?

Yes women get 100% say because they are the ones who have to deal with being pregnant and/or giving birth, not the man. The man can opt out completely if the gov't never stepped in to enforce some accountability. Again, the fact that you don't get this proves you're an idiot.
 

GodsPerspective

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,378
Reputation
945
Daps
13,130
Yes women get 100% say because they are the ones who have to deal with being pregnant and/or giving birth, not the man. The man can opt out completely if the gov't never stepped in to enforce some accountability. Again, the fact that you don't get this proves you're an idiot.

There is no logic in your post:francis:

I refuse to lower myself to the level of thots... begone!
 

The M.I.C.

The King In The West 👑
Supporter
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
25,118
Reputation
14,993
Daps
106,689
Reppin
Charlotte - Washington D.C.
Yes women get 100% say because they are the ones who have to deal with being pregnant and/or giving birth, not the man. The man can opt out completely if the gov't never stepped in to enforce some accountability. Again, the fact that you don't get this proves you're an idiot.

Women do not get a say.

The government gets a say, power is completely vested in the state. If people were more responsible and understood this, adopting mature mindsets and logic, they would undercut this gross overreach of State power and work together for the benefit of their offspring.
 
Top