Do you consider Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, and Genghis Khan evil?

[Killigraphy]

Xerxes
Alexander
Leonidas
Tariq Ziyad

etc


All brave men, who committed evil acts

 

[AlainLocke]

They are evil scumbags and most people on the winning side of history are...

You are talking about enslavers, mass rapists and mass killers

Women used to kill themselves when the Mongols came because they didn't want to be raped...

Anybody that thinks that Ghengis Khan and people like him ain't evil are playing some moral relativist bullshyt game...

If them motherfukkers ain't evil than who is?

 

[The Fade]

Alexander was a bytch nikka. His father phillip ii was better but he was also a homo.

 

[bigdaddy88]

Even the false jesus is androgynous yall nikkas asleep sorry

I don't even think that the bold are even remotely possible in this day and age.

Am a sinner like anybody else soooo am not judging anybody's moral conduct, but when it comes to certain things God will give u eyes to see and ears to ear bruh

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

Spartacus & Hannibal>>>>>>>

 

[Devilinurear]

Alexander was a bytch nikka. His father phillip ii was better but he was also a homo.

He always lead his army in battle.

What made him a bytch in your opinion?

 

[Luck]

If you a man that wouldn’t want to conquer other men then you’re probably a fakkit

 

[The Fade]

He always lead his army in battle.

What made him a bytch in your opinion?

The whole Philotas and Parmenion affair

Killing Cleitus the Black

Ransacking Persopolis because Ptolemy’s jump off told him to do it in revenge for Athens. Even tho Macedonians were a nonfactor at the time of that conflict and that Greeks never considered them true Greeks. Macedonia got its beginnings as a vassal state to Persia in the first place

But what I do think is funny is that’s cacs love this dude but back then, part of the reason he got killed was because he was “mixing races”

 

[50CentStan]

I would put hitler in that list as well. And yes absolutely all evil.

 

[Dave24]

If you a man that wouldn’t want to conquer other men then you’re probably a fakkit

Why do you feel that way?

 

[HabitualChiller]

They are evil scumbags and most people on the winning side of history are...

You are talking about enslavers, mass rapists and mass killers

Women used to kill themselves when the Mongols came because they didn't want to be raped...

Anybody that thinks that Ghengis Khan and people like him ain't evil are playing some moral relativist bullshyt game...

If them motherfukkers ain't evil than who is?

Also this. If you consider these guys to be great, then would you also consider people like Stalin, Hitler and Hideki Tojo to be great as well?

What's the real difference here? Japan was straight murking nikkas ala The Mongols( they might've actually been worse because at least the Mongols gave the option of surrender. The Chinese military committed mass surrender in Nanking and they still got massacred...), but the mongols get praise for what they did.

 

[PL368Z]

The were genocidal maniacs and khan is by a large margin the biggest rapist in human history, if they're not evil than no one is.

 

[The Fade]

Even the false jesus is androgynous yall nikkas asleep sorry

Am a sinner like anybody else soooo am not judging anybody's moral conduct, but when it comes to certain things God will give u eyes to see and ears to ear bruh

Can someone answer me why Jesus makes that Sabazios hand tho?

 

[Devilinurear]

Also this. If you consider these guys to be great, then would you also consider people like Stalin, Hitler and Hideki Tojo to be great as well?

What's the real difference here? Japan was straight murking nikkas ala The Mongols( they might've actually been worse because at least the Mongols gave the option of surrender. The Chinese military committed mass surrender in Nanking and they still got massacred...), but the mongols get praise for what they did.

Because if you surrendered and paid they pretty much left you alone.
Also if you were a trader when crossing there territory you had a low chance being attacked by bandits.

All that was pretty good.

 

[AlainLocke]

Also this. If you consider these guys to be great, then would you also consider people like Stalin, Hitler and Hideki Tojo to be great as well?

What's the real difference here? Japan was straight murking nikkas ala The Mongols( they might've actually been worse because at least the Mongols gave the option of surrender. The Chinese military committed mass surrender in Nanking and they still got massacred...), but the mongols get praise for what they did.

I mean...Ghengis Khan was literally African warlord status in terms of his brutality and nobody considers African warlords great...

I mean...Ghengis Khan did innovative shyt...like he was multiculturalist and created extensive trade networks...and blah blah

But so does most evil talented motherfukkers do great things

People like to think good people are talented and evil people are stupid and mindless

Because people like think that God or whatever bestows genius upon good people...not pieces of shyt... because being talented is awesome

Look at how the USA reveres the Founding Fathers and the Enlightenment philosophers

And these are very modern group of people

Oh they are great men with dignity and honor

When in reality they were hypocritical, rapist, slave trading White Supremacists

And just because they wrote some pretty words and had some great ideas...they are forever excused for being pieces of shyt

Genius blinds people from reality and makes people Juelz evil behavior away