Do you dudes actually enjoy higher Refresh Rates on LEDs?

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
65,427
Reputation
10,269
Daps
218,584
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
So you're telling me, with no bias in your thoughts that a 4k tv running at 4k is inferior for gaming when compared to this w900a tv that you mention here.
no bias. the 4K TV running at 4K is better looking. but for ur everyday use. I like the way the W900a runs better. it's essentially the same TV fam. just the 1080p version..they both have the same technology aside from the resolution. they both have Sony's Trilluminous display. so they both are great with color. I just like the way everyday shyt looks better on the W900a. the response time for gaming is better on the W900a. and I like the way the blacks look on w900a better for some reason. son. Ive had so much time with both tv's. Ive tested them out. the refresh rate is higher on the W900a as well but like I said it doesn't really matter when it comes to Sony. BUT..I will say that overall the W900a is smoother when in comes to motion as well.
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,027
Daps
43,620
Reppin
Los Angeles
no bias. the 4K TV running at 4K is better looking. but for ur everyday use. I like the way the W900a runs better. it's essentially the same TV fam. just the 1080p version..they both have the same technology aside from the resolution. they both have Sony's Trilluminous display. so they both are great with color. I just like the way everyday shyt looks better on the W900a. the response time for gaming is better on the W900a. and I like the way the blacks look on w900a better for some reason. son. Ive had so much time with both tv's. Ive tested them out. the refresh rate is higher on the W900a as well but like I said it doesn't really matter when it comes to Sony. BUT..I will say that overall the W900a is smoother when in comes to motion as well.
So you're saying the tech for the 4k needs to improve.
 
Top