I just got out of the hospitol, so it's hard for me to type. I can barely see so excuse me.
When people speak of god or GODs I feel like there is a distinction to be made between flesh and blood beings even if they deem themselves to be creators and what I would call an architect.
Being that i'm struggling as is, i'll try sand keep iy short and say that "gods" as most humans describe them i believe more often than not flesh and blood. For instance the god or gods of the bible are not architects, super- natural or moral authoritarians on anything. as we humans as we knoe ourselves to be advance in genetic manipulation there will come a day where we view ourzelvez as gods, as creators, and we are in that sense but we are not architechs, nor are we zuper-natural or unex[explainable to any life form with the cognitive ability to grasp the scope of our existence. You can' explain quanum phyusis to an ant, that doessn't mean it'z super-natural.
As for the distinctions and what I personally believe...yes, I believe in "gods" as in beings who may have been more technologically or even mathematically advanced and deemed themselves the moral authority over their chattel, much like we do no with animals. As for an architech, a creator, the "one" or all that is, i woulld say I am much more open to that Idea than I am the idea of this all being random, I don't NEED to believe in it...you remove that qwholw concept from my mindframe not much changes about how I feel about who, what I am.
I prpopse yhr idea that man is god, you dig?
I hope everbody is doing ok, I love you all, real shyt. Don't let the days or weeks events drag your perceptions of self down, please.
Peace.