radiohead???
please stop.
and that data with the sat/iq sources and the college data is flawed. there's so much things wrong with it right there. you can't always rely on these research studies because they leave out important, crucial factors that most definitely would alter the result. there's tons of examples. the simplest one could be that the person that may listen to beethoven may have had kaplan prep courses to help them get that high sat score. plus that person might listen to other genres of music as well.
if you really want to put this logic to the test, let them do a research on sat, iq, and etc with daily activities that we do on the regular and you'll see how bullshyt this thing is. they know that it would be stupid to do a research on sat scores and the foods that people eat, sat scores and the number of car accidents that people get in, sat scores and the tv shows that people watch, sat scores and the video games that people play BECAUSE you can't determine someone's intelligence off of that shyt. you can't. there's plenty of idiots that listen to beethoven that probably don't know how to do their time tables. there's plenty of lil wayne listens that are fukking geniuses.
if you want to know if someone is intelligent, they let their brain through their thoughts, actions, and etc speak for itself. there's more than one form of intelligence. there's many aspects of intelligences. an sat score and iq test can't measure how smart someone is or what someone knows. a smart person doesn't have to do things to give the impression that they're smart. there's a difference between acting like you're smart and actually being smart. there's plenty of people that do stupid things that are fukking geniuses in some shape or form. there's plenty of idiots that actually are in top positions. look @ george w. bush.
