Jay-Z is what I’d call bad business, on the overall. There are black business people who do good business on bigger levels.Yeah, liberating black people from what little we got![]()
You run to Jay-Z because you’re focused on entertainment.
Jay-Z is what I’d call bad business, on the overall. There are black business people who do good business on bigger levels.Yeah, liberating black people from what little we got![]()
I saw his review and it made me watch the movie.
I think his point was Black People who “made it” overly shyt on Black who “didn’t make it”. It dovetails into the fake Black Male HBCU crisis
also although the movie was supposed to be camp the shyt was low key lazily written and contrived as hell.
But like him I low key liked it for what it was.
I even agreed with his criticism of Get Out. despite also liking it.
So you admit “Black capitalism” only benefits a select few and there’s only limited opportunity for the collective? Just so we’re clear.
![]()
Yeah. Why wouldn’t it?
The projects Jay Z sells aren’t great.
Black capitalism is absolutely a tool of liberation. I think leftists want the most return with the least investment of energy and sacrifice.
I find Larry Langford as entertaining as the next man but I digressJay-Z is what I’d call bad business, on the overall. There are black business people who do good business on bigger levels.
You run to Jay-Z because you’re focused on entertainment.
This exact sequence is in every FD videoF.D. had an excellent take which he rightfully put in the signified B-sides where he said that people just want to get a nut off on dissing Black Men with the concern trolling about the HBCU “crisis”.
But then he fukked it up by using a bell hooks reference to make his point.
Not because he was wrong about what hooks said or about people not reading enough of hooks stuff but by again dancing around the fact the shea butta section basically concern trolls to clown Black Men.
The frustrating thing about this is that a lot of this media analysis wants to prioritize mediocrity as being more legitimate than people who figure it out. They really do hate successful black people and claim money makes black people “less” black in their eyes in a way.
This really is an intellectual way of rejecting success and reinforces the very paradigms that give rise to negativity in our communities...
These guys really are rebels without a cause...
What are you confused by?
You don’t see the contradiction here?What are you confused by?
I think you don’t understand what you said.
Why would millions of black people come up? Under what expectation do you have for that?
Look I’m going to keep it direct. I absolutely want a black elite. I want it expanded and I want it to have more influence and I want to make it difficult to join because I want excellent people with stellar experience and credentials proving their value and worth to the group.
Why is that wrong?
What does more struggle do for you?Love it when the truth comes to light
What have i been telling yall about these Democratic schills all this time. Ive constantly pointed out their boule-centric mindframes. Its a common theme,that rears its ugly head when you see the disdain and vitriol they have for poor and less educated blacks. They hate the same demographic of black people that many MAGA/white supremacist hate.
And the answer to this thread is assimilation. The less nikkas struggle,the more compromised they become. Its just apart of our white supremacy programming.
No. You didn’t point out the contradiction.You don’t see the contradiction here?
![]()
This worth a watch.This exact sequence is in every FD video![]()
What does more struggle do for you?
Black capitalism and liberationNo. You didn’t point out the contradiction.
So the one who says that "everyone should be recognized for their contributions to the community" sees people as fodder? But not the one literally calling for black capitalists to rule over the permanent underclass?Youre projecting again.
I dont see people as fodder. YOU do. Thats why you called them that.