DOJ Demands CNN To Be Sold

Colilluminati

TAMRON HALL STAN
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
10,773
Reputation
2,519
Daps
24,182
Reppin
MiddleWest
nikka you are in an entirely different place with this. :what:

IDGAF if Trump blocks this if the reasoning is "to prevent a viable media monopoly". He's not blocking it on those grounds, the DOJ is blocking it based purely on partisanship. That is the issue.


They can keep CNN if they sale Direct TV. :yeshrug:

Whatever you guys wanna call it the deal should not be approved .
 

Triipe

All Star
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Messages
1,210
Reputation
-720
Daps
3,203
Reppin
South Fulton / Mississippi
It is more about the potential abuses of media power that AT&T could inflect going forward
AT&T defends Time Warner merger, announces $35 DirecTV streaming
Those pesky regulators
Stephenson acknowledged that regulators will likely impose conditions on AT&T's purchase of Time Warner. As we noted in previous stories, owning Time Warner would give AT&T incentive to raise the prices its rivals (such as Comcast, Charter, and Verizon) pay to distribute Time Warner programming on their cable TV systems, which could indirectly raise consumers' TV bills. @Call Me James

AT&T could also harm online video services that compete against DirecTV by charging them higher prices for content or refusing to license videos. AT&T could favor Time Warner video on its own networks by letting it stream without counting against the data caps applied to video services like Netflix. (While DirecTV Now will be available over any Internet connection, it won't count against data caps on AT&T's mobile network if the company follows its past practices.)


Stephenson said that Time Warner will continue to distribute its content "widely and broadly"
after the merger without giving exclusive access to AT&T. Time Warner news divisions like CNN will also retain editorial independence:troll:, he said.

AT&T has suggested that it might not need FCC approval to complete the merger, though it may end up having to apply for FCC approval of certain license transfers. The Department of Justice will review the merger regardless of whether the FCC has to approve any license transfers.

DOJ is stepping in because the FCC has no nuts and is filled to the brim with "lobbyist"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this conflict of interest one of the things that sorta related to net nutrality? like funneling users to specific products, which in turn is anti- competitive. media market shares are wack, people consolidating pieces of the pie

saw T-Mobile giving out netflix for free, not really a good comparison but it shows how they are grouping together services. it's all about # of users and consolidation :francis:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
43,021
Reputation
6,702
Daps
137,679
Reppin
CookoutGang
It is more about the potential abuses of media power that AT&T could inflect going forward


DOJ is stepping in because the FCC has no nuts and is filled to the brim with "lobbyist"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this conflict of interest one of the things that sorta related to net nutrality? like funneling users to specific products, which in turn is anti- competitive. media market shares are wack, people consolidating pieces of the pie

saw T-Mobile giving out netflix for free, not really a good comparison but it shows how they are grouping together services. it's all about # of users and consolidation :francis:
Not really. It's more about them having access to their entire supply chain. Those are viable concerns and there are numerous ways to go about this. It's not so much the number of users. It's about the ability to prove that users will be negatively affected with regard to the DOJ. If the FCC challenged the merger then ATT would have to prove how it wouldn't harm customers.

That said during their consent decree negotiations many of the concerns people have can and likely would be addressed them. If you'd like to see an example refer to Ticketmaster/Livenation:

Ticketmaster / Live Nation merger: DOJ officially approves the deal with conditions
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,510
Daps
37,700
Anybody with sense has 0 issue with the blocking of the merger itself. It's the reasoning BEHIND what's blocking the merger that's scary as all hell.
Maybe they were going to block it anyway and they’re trying to muddy the waters just for fun.
 

Triipe

All Star
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Messages
1,210
Reputation
-720
Daps
3,203
Reppin
South Fulton / Mississippi
Not really. It's more about them having access to their entire supply chain. Those are viable concerns and there are numerous ways to go about this. It's not so much the number of users. It's about the ability to prove that users will be negatively affected with regard to the DOJ. If the FCC challenged the merger then ATT would have to prove how it wouldn't harm customers.

That said during their consent decree negotiations many of the concerns people have can and likely would be addressed them. If you'd like to see an example refer to Ticketmaster/Livenation:

Ticketmaster / Live Nation merger: DOJ officially approves the deal with conditions

:ehh: I just hate the new normality of network operators purchasing content rights.

Don't get it twisted, it's not just TV rights... they are seeking the entire Warner Brothers Entertainment ting (Ellen, TMZ, E!, DC Films/Comics, New Line Cinema, LeBron James
6s7iZKt.png
, HBO, NBAtv/Leaguepass, SI.com, and the entire WB Music catalog) royalties on royalties on royalties :dwillhuh:

AT&T's wireless network seeks to become the best place to find all of Time Warner's content — and lure in customers that way. Americans are shifting a huge amount of their entertainment consumption to mobile screens. If AT&T can get its tablet users to stream HBO Now as opposed to content it doesn't own, AT&T effectively gets paid twice: Once for the use of cellular data, and once for the subscription revenue from HBO. Extend that across all of AT&T's 133 million cellular connections and numerous content sources it'll own through Time Warner, and that's a lot of new potential revenue.

Second, it'll earn even more money by studying its customers' content consumption. Because AT&T collects a ton of data about how its customers use its services, that behavioral information could help AT&T sell targeted ads that are more lucrative than standard advertisements. With Time Warner's assets, AT&T will learn even more about people's preferences.
Whysr-URL-Builder-API-DataEverywhere-1.jpg

What will this mean for competition and choices?

Here's where it starts to get really interesting. AT&T could charge other companies for the rights to air, say, "Inception" on their networks, or for the use of the Superman brand. Left unchecked, AT&T could abuse this power and force other Web companies, other cable companies, other content companies or even consumers to accept terms they otherwise would never agree to.

[AT&T's Time Warner deal looks like bad news for Verizon]

This is why AT&T's deal will receive close examination from federal regulators. If things go the way Comcast's purchase of NBCUniversal did in 2011, AT&T's deal could be approved if it agrees to several conditions aimed at making sure the deal doesn't harm competition.

What might those conditions look like?

Hard to say; they're usually specific to the deal. But they could, for example, ban AT&T from saying to consumers, "Look, come to our wireless service and we'll let you stream as much HBO as you want at no charge." Or it could try to disadvantage its competitors' own content on AT&T's platform. Regulators may conclude that these kinds of arrangement could disproportionately hurt AT&T's rivals.

Everything you need to know about AT&T’s deal with Time Warner


CNN is water under the bridge in this scenario, whole deal should be 86'd, but :hubie:I'm not the dictator of america :mjgrin:
 
Top