Donovan McNabb vs Michael Vick

Who would you pick as the better overall QB in their primes?

  • McNabb

    Votes: 69 78.4%
  • Vick

    Votes: 19 21.6%

  • Total voters
    88

GR13

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
3,677
Reputation
2,204
Daps
27,145
Reppin
NULL
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was








amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble







 
Last edited:

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
40,481
Reputation
100
Daps
114,846
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was





amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble





Now put up some Vick videos :mjgrin:
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
79,735
Reputation
17,829
Daps
216,520
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
Now put up some Vick videos :mjgrin:
1JPqZmS.gif

this alone is enough

:mjgrin:

it'll never be done again

*
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
24,316
Reputation
2,295
Daps
70,081
Mc5 for me obviously he's not as athletically gifted as Vick but Donovan is still a very athletically gifted in his on right and even though McNabb has flaws in his game he is still a
more skilled/polished QB then Vick

people forget how fast and how elusive a runner young Donovan was





amazing pocket escapability and great instinctual play making ability to find/locate receiver on the run/scramble




:whew:

I remember this play on MNF



:wow:
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
24,316
Reputation
2,295
Daps
70,081
McNabb was the better passer and quarterback and was better for much longer.

In my mind, Vick had two good years (2002 and 2010). His 2010 was excellent though. I wish Vick had studied more, as well as played in this era where coaches are more open to building around talent rather than fitting talent around their rigid scheme. Maybe we'll see what Vick could have been with Lamar in Baltimore :wow:
 
Top