Do you take issue with fascism? You want to completely recreate education and want to do away with private property? That sounds like fascism. Are you French?
What is open courseware going to actually provide for people not on some altruistic/ hippie bullshyt level? Their employers gain what exactly? America will go from a barely trained workforce to what exactly? One thing I've found about education it takes more than wanting to learn and money. You'll always have classes.
The guy from the hood? He can take out federal and state loans and get himself a degree and have a great future. You can learn a trade and build off of that. If he's about that life he can buy ounces then quarters break it down a hundred a gram. There's a lot of ways to change your situation.
You seem to just oppose everything at once. There is a huge difference between the abolishment of all private property and the acknowledgement that land ownership is completely arbitrary. "I got here first" is complete bullshyt. You can not expect these people to just 'learn a trade' and solve all of their problems. Young people are too in debt to do that. The game is rigged. Im just glad I have made it to where I am and that I have been able to achieve a large degree of success for myself relative to my age.
I think the saddest part of growing up and going to college has been coming to the realization that everyone in America is given a one in 100 shot to do things that most people will never have, but most of us waste that shot. However, the social darwinist , objectivist way of thinking you seem to be advocating just completely disregards the role that force has played in the world's getting to its current state. So people that came before me, who have passed down land and other forms of capital that they acquired by the barrel of a gun are allowed that advantage, while I am forced to accept government monopoly on force?
I think the key distinction I am trying to make is that Rockefeller, for example, deserved his fortune because of his scientific method, nit because he had access to the land from which the oil came. The idea that the earth can be owned is the biggest hoax in history. Let us not forget there was a time in which all land belonged to the king,because 'God said so'.
I am not necessarily advocating any particular solution to the problems of this world, but acting as if health care is something that people could not easily have unlimited access to outside of the restrictions of the monetary system is just silly.
You seem to be extremely dismissive of MIT opencourse, did you graduate from /go to college(genuinely asking)? That shyt is an amazing resource.